1 / 21

Li-ion batteries 101

Li-ion batteries 101. Transportation sector : Understanding the scale. Role of transportation and electricity in CO 2 emissions 1,2. 14% of total CO 2 emissions (6 GtonCO 2 /year).  Transportation :.  Electricity and heat :. 25% of total CO 2 emissions (11 GtonCO 2 /year).

brenna
Télécharger la présentation

Li-ion batteries 101

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Li-ion batteries 101

  2. Transportation sector : Understanding the scale • Role of transportation and electricity in CO2 emissions1,2 • 14% of total CO2 emissions (6 GtonCO2/year) • Transportation : • Electricity and heat : • 25% of total CO2 emissions (11 GtonCO2/year) • Number of vehicles will triple by 2050 • 1Kromer & Heywood, MIT, 2007 • 1 2IEA, World Energy Outlook 2012

  3. The challenge for energy storage : High energy density and high power density at low cost • Cars run 1-4 miles per kWh (35 Mpg => 0.25kWh/mile) • 200 mile driving range requires 50-200kWh • Car operation requires power of 100-200hp (75-150kW) • Volumetric energy density for different storage technologies • Current Li-ion batteries have ~15% the volumetric energy density of gasoline • At predicted ~500$/kWh, Li-ion batteries for 200 mile range at 0.25kWh/mile costs about 25 000$ ! 3Cell level, 80% charge to wheel efficiency (data from Samsung 403450 LiCoO2 cell and LG chem) 1 9.7 kWh/l for C8H18 , 20% engine to wheel 22.5 kWh/l for CH4 at 250 bars, 40% engine to wheel

  4. Requirements for rechargeable batteries • Energy Density (kWh/l) • Energy per unit volume, must be high for long driving range • Energy/volume = Energy/charge x #Charge/mass x #mass/volume • Mass density (kg/L) • Voltage (V) • Power Density (kW/l) • Charge capacity (Ah/kg) • Energy per unit time and volume, must be high for fastacceleration and fast charge • Largely determined by the diffusivity of Li in the cathode and anode • Safety • Temperature the battery can sustain without catching fire • Cycle life • Number of times the battery can be charged/discharged without energy loss

  5. Li is shuffled from a high energy state to a low energy state (discharge) and vice-versa for charge Li-ion batteries : How they work • Low voltage means high energy, high voltage means low energy • Anode (Low voltage) • Li is in a high energy state • Cathode (High voltage) • Li is in a low energy state • Electrolyte • Blocks e- passage, let Li+ pass • (Low energy) • (High energy) • (Low voltage) • (High voltage) • Discharge : Li goes from the anode (high E) to the cathode (low E) • Work is extracted (run your car) • Charge : Li goes from the cathode (low E) to the anode(high E) • Work must be provided (plug the battery into the wall)

  6. Li is shuffled from a high energy state to a low energy state during discharge, vice-versa for charge Li-ion batteries : How they work • Charge1 • Discharge1 • Anode and cathode : Host materials that can intercalate Li in interstitial sites • Very little changes to the crystal structure as Li is inserted or removed => Reversibility • Reversibility => Rechargeability 1Pictures inspired by “Park, Goodenough. JACS, 2013, 135” & http://www.clker.com/clipart-14374.html

  7. Li-ion batteries components : The electrolyte1 • Lithium salts (LiPF6) dissolved in organic solvents (EC:DMC) • Electrolyte bandgap blocks electron passage1 • EC:DMC solvent • LiPF6 salt dissolved in organic liquid EC:DMC (ethylene carbone – dimethyl carbonate) • Electronic energy gap forbids electron passage (only Li+ can pass through) • Anode and cathode voltages must be within the electrolyte stability window (2-4.5V vs Li/Li+). • Upper limit on voltage => Upper limit on energy density • Flammable at high temperature 1Goodenough, J.B & Park, K.S. “The Li-ion battery : A Perspective”, JACS, 135, 2013, 1167-1176.

  8. Safety : Fires caused by Electrolyte and Cathode • Many cases of batteries catching fire (laptops, cars, airplanes) • Malfunction (ex:short-circuit) => Temperature Rise => Oyxgen evolution at the cathode => Combustion of the electrolyte • Cathode (ex:LiCoO2) contains oxygen. Above a certain temperature, the cathode material starts decomposing and O2 is emitted. • The electrolyte is an organic solvent, i.e. a fuel. • Live demonstration (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pizFsY0yjss)

  9. Li-ion cathode (Low Li Energy, High Voltage) • 3 cathode materials have been commercialized : LiCoO2, LiMn2O4, LiFePO4 • Each have their advantages and drawbacks : No silver bullet • LiCoO2 • Most widely used cathode materials (cell phones, laptops, Tesla) • High energy density (170mAh/g , 3.9V vs Limetal) • Charge time [high power equipment] ~ 1 hour (C-rate~1C)1 • Unsafe (O2evolution temperature <200oC) • LiMn2O4 • Used in Chevrolet Volt and Nissan Leaf • Lower energy density than LiCoO2(110mAh/g , 4V vs Limetal) • Charge time [high power equipment] is ~3 min (C-rate~20C)1 • Safer than LiCoO2 (O2 evolution temperature ~ 300oC) • Lifetime concerns (Mn dissolution, engineering required for higher lifetime) • 1In practice, this rate can only be achieved at very high currents, i.e. in a high power charging station

  10. Li-ion cathode (Low Li Energy, High Voltage) • 3 cathode materials have been commercialized : LiCoO2, LiMn2O4, LiFePO4 • Each have their advantages and drawbacks : No silver bullet • LiFePO4 • Only used in niche applications (Power Tools, Electrical Buses, Motorcycles) • Lower energy density than LiCoO2 and LiMn2O4(170mAh/g , 3.4V vs Li metal), due to low voltage and nano-processing • Very high power density : Charge [high power limit] is 1 minute1 (C-rate=50C) • Very safe (O2 evolution temperature ~ 500oC) • Most expensive cathode due to nano-processing • 1Can only be achieved at very high currents

  11. Li-ion battery anodes (High Li Energy, Low Voltage) • Li metal : Ideal anode but unsafe • Lithium metal is the highest possible energy state for Li and hence the lowest possible voltage (0V vs Li metal) • High charge capacity (3600 mAh/g) • Unsafe upon battery operation: Dendrites form and short-circuit the battery • Commercial anode : Graphite (LiC6) • Lithium intercalates between graphene sheets (LixC6, 0≤x≤1) • Low voltage : 0.2V vs Li metal • Voltage is below the stability limit of the electrolyte, but surface passivation (SEI) occurs during battery operation • Li • Co • High charge capacity : 372 mAh/g • (but low compared to 3600 mAh/g for Li metal)

  12. Energy Density and Power Density • High energy density with respect to other rechargeable batteries • Low energy density with respect to IC engine and fuel cells • Power density comparable to IC Engine • Compared to other rechargeable batteries1 • Compared to IC engine and fuel cells2 1Tarascon, J.M. & Armand, M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature414, 359–367 (2001). 2Srinavasan, V. Batteries for vehicular applications, AIP conference proceedings, 1044, 283 (2008).

  13. Electric cars on the market • Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEV) : Toyota Prius, 24k$-29k$ 1 • Toyota Prius • Electrical motor (EM) assists internal combustion engine (ICE) • Battery is charged by the engine (not really an electric car) • EM+ICE is more efficient than ICE alone (acceleration assistance, regenerative breaking, start and drive in electric mode, smaller and more efficient engine) • 500Wh of electric energy used (below 500$ at current Li-ion battery cost) • Toyota Prius (HEV) vs Lincoln MKZ (ICE) : 41Mpg (city) vs 18 Mpg (city), same cost1 • 1Ceder G. 3.70 : Materials Science of Clean Energy, Lecture Notes, MIT, 2013.

  14. Electric cars on the market • Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV) : Chevrolet Volt, 39k$ 1 • Electric drive train, LiMn2O4 battery • First 40 miles2 from the battery, rest from the electricity generated by an ICE • About 70% of all daily driving in the US is less than 40 miles • Battery guaranteed 8 years or • 100 000 miles, with 10-30% battery energy loss after 8 years. • 1Prices do not include tax incentives • 2EPA certified driving range • 3Wikipedia

  15. Electric cars on the market • Electric vehicles (EV) : Nissan Leaf (35k$), Tesla Model S (60-80k$)1 • Electric drive train powered only by a battery • Nissan : 75 miles2 (24kWh battery), 35k$ 1 • Tesla Model S : 160-265 miles2 (40-85kWh battery), 60-80k$ 1 • Tesla model S • Nissan Leaf • 1Prices do not include tax incentives • 2EPA-certified range

  16. Costs compared to an average 23 mpg car1,2 • PHEV : 16 000$ extra , EV : 17 000$ extra (without tax incentives) • Gasoline : 0.50$ per kWh (3.7$/gallon) , Electricity : 0.15$ per kWh • Average fuel cost (3.7$/gallon, 13 000 miles a year, 23mpg) : 2100$/year • Fuel savings over 5 years : 35mpg car 4000$, PHEV 7250$, EV 9000$ • After 5 years : Price of ICE, PHEV and EV are similar (with tax incentives) 1 Mackenzie, D. 2.65 Lecture Notes, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2www.fueleconomy.gov

  17. CO2 emissions : Better than ICE but depends on electricity mix • Different studies predict different results (car efficiency, electricity mix, driving habits, etc) • Kromer & Welwood, MIT, 2007 • Karplus, MIT, 2012 • All technologies • Nissan Versa (35mpg) : 317 g CO2/mile • Chevrolet Volt (PHEV) : 260 g CO2/mile (US), 200 g CO2/mile (Mass) • Less CO2 • Nissan Leaf : 230 g CO2/mile (US), 140 g CO2/mile (Mass) • Toyota PRIUS (HEV) : 222 g CO2/mile • (www.fueleconomy.gov, EPA standards)

  18. CO2 emissions depend on the electricity mix • Left side of error bar : All natural gas, Right side of error bar : All coal1 • 1 Kromer & Heywood, MIT, 2007 • Accepted trends • US electricity mix : 42% coal, 25% natural gas, 19% nuclear, 13% hydro + renewables • Carbon-free electricity : PHEVs displace ~70% of CO2 emissions, EV displace 100% • All coal : HEV is better than PHEV, but PHEV still better than best ICE • All natural gas : ~50% of CO2 reduction with PHEV (better than HEV and ICE)

  19. Cost projections for battery price (pack level) • Cost reduction is slowing down • Cost projections (pack level) • Cell level • Battery pack cost today : 650$-1000$/kWh (32 500$ - 50 000$ for 200 miles) • Foreseeable cost with current Li-ion battery technology : ~400-500$/kWh • Even then : Full EV battery cost ~20 000-25 000$ for a small car with 200 miles • Major cost decreases required for EV adoption (via increase in energy density)

  20. Prospects for future batteries • Li-air battery Pictures courtesy: G. Girishkumar et al., JPCL (2010) metal anode air cathode 2Li+ + 2e− + O2 Li2O2 Li2O2 2Li+ + 2e− + O2 Veq: 2.96 V • High energy density only possible if O2 is compressed, engineering challenges • [1.4-1.9 kWh/l if O2 is compressed 0.6-0.7 kWh/l if O2 is not compressed] • Low roundtrip efficiency (50-60%), Poor cyclability (10-100cycles) • Other issues (Li metal anode, etc), R&D required • Other R & D : Li-sulfur, Conversion materials, Multivalent, etc.

  21. Conclusions • Li-ion batteries : Reversible shuffling of Li between anode and cathode • Different anode and cathode materials have advantages and drawbacks (cost, energy density, safety, cyclability) • HEV’s have penetrated the market and reduce CO2 emissions • PHEV’s make sense economically, but little market penetration. • Li-ion batteries are too costly for full EV’s. Need new materials with higher energy density.

More Related