1 / 28

Public Management Watch (PMW)

Public Management Watch (PMW). 9 June 2006. Public Management Watch - Aim/Purpose. To be able to preempt the deterioration in management within national and provincial government in order to intervene if necessary. Public Management Watch. Statistical analysis Oversight Departments.

briar
Télécharger la présentation

Public Management Watch (PMW)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Public Management Watch (PMW) 9 June 2006

  2. Public Management Watch - Aim/Purpose • To be able to preempt the deterioration in management within national and provincial government in order to intervene if necessary.

  3. Public Management Watch Statistical analysis Oversight Departments Need for intervention assessed Communication to dept’s Self-assessment Qualitative analysis into department Re assessment based on feedback and updated info

  4. Turnover • Professionals & Managers • Weight 5% • Parameters 7 – 13% • Average 11,07% • Total • Weight 5% • Parameters 7 – 13% • Average 8,38% • Indicates • Inability to retain staff • Turnover is not just affected by the salaries but also work environment.

  5. Replacement Rate • Professionals & Managers • Weight 7% • Parameters 90 – 70% • Average 141% • Total • Weight 6% • Parameters 90 - 70% • Average 125% • Indicates • Inability to recruit HR Resources. • Departmental restructuring

  6. Vacancies • Professionals & Managers • Weight 8% • Parameters 20 – 35% • Average 35% • Total • Weight 5% • Parameters 20 - 35% • Average 21% • Indicates • Inability to recruit HR Resources – Supply, administratively. • Read with the spending on compensation of employees • Underfunding • Unreliable structure • Inaccurate data

  7. Period of vacancies • Weight 8% • Parameters 6 – 9 months • Average 14.9 months • Indicates • Inability to recruit HR Resources – Supply, administratively. • Read with the spending on compensation of employees • Underfunding • Unreliable structure • Inacurate data

  8. % of posts filled additional to the establishment • Weight 8% • Parameters 4 – 10% • Average 4% • Indicates • Unreliable structure does not cater for all the mandates of the department

  9. % of posts filled out of adjustment • Weight 8% • Parameters 10 – 20% • Average 11,3% • Indicates • Misalignment between posts and employees – unreliable structure • Remainder from old rank and leg promotions

  10. Average days vacation leave credits • Weight 9% • Parameters Depending of the time within the cycle • Average Depending of the time within the cycle • Indicates • A high number of credits generally/usually reflects poor administration of leave

  11. Average days sick leave credits • Weight 8% • Parameters Depending of the time within the cycle • Average Depending of the time within the cycle • Indicates • A high number of credits usually/generally reflects poor administration of leave • A high usage of sick leave could also indicate problems within the working environment

  12. % of service terminations backdated • Weight 5% • Parameters 8 – 18% • Average 12% • Indicates • Generally/usually indicates poor workflow/administration within a department

  13. Average period of terminations backdated • Weight 5% • Parameters 2 – 3 months • Average 3,11 months • Indicates • Generally/usually indicates poor workflow/administration within a department

  14. % of budget on compensation of employees spent • Weight 8% • Parameters -5 to 5% • Indicates • Indicates the funds available for the filling of vacancies

  15. % of budget on goods and services spent • Weight 5% • Parameters -5 to 5% • Average • Indicates • Ability of the department to control and spend their funding for goods and services

  16. % of budget on capital spend (only at the end of the financial year) • Indicates • Ability of the department to control and spend their funding for capital goods

  17. Statistical analysis - Scoring • Indicators weighted – Relevance is determined in relation to each other • Levels of acceptability determined – what is acceptable and what is unacceptable • Score calculated – scoring based on weight and levels • Departments rated based on scores

  18. Statistical analysis – In-depth information • Top 10-15 departments selected based on scores • In-depth analysis based on: (comparison with sector & province)

  19. Analysis by working group • Composition of working group • DPSA, Nat Treasury, Presidency, DPLG • National oversight dept’s (where relevant) • Education, Health, Social Development

  20. Public Management Watch Statistical analysis Oversight Departments Need for intervention assessed Communication to dept’s Self-assessment Qualitative analysis into department Re assessment based on feedback and updated info

  21. Self-assessment • Areas to investigate • Information/data • Administration • Management • Impact on service delivery – Assessment framework developed • Identify best practice department (over time) to assist if required

  22. Public Management Watch Statistical analysis Oversight Departments Need for intervention assessed Communication to dept’s Self-assessment Qualitative analysis into department Re assessment based on feedback and updated info

  23. Public Management Watch Statistical analysis Oversight Departments Need for intervention assessed Communication to dept’s Self-assessment Qualitative analysis into department Re assessment based on feedback and updated info

  24. Investigation approach • Team – DPSA, NT & Oversight dept’s • Pre-investigation info gathering • Briefing of department • Analytical framework are being developed by DPSA to identify those factors that influence the effective utilisation of human resources

  25. Public Management Watch Statistical analysis Oversight Departments Need for intervention assessed Communication to dept’s Self-assessment Qualitative analysis into department Re assessment based on feedback and updated info

  26. Intervention • PMW would attempt to link up departments that have proven track record of best practice in specific areas with departments in need of assistance

  27. Thank you

More Related