1 / 25

Late Burning Stages

Late Burning Stages. Late Burning Stages. Late Burning Stages. Late Burning Stages. Late Burning Stages. Q He ~Q C+C ~Q O+O but  He >>  C+C >>  O+O. O burning;   > 10 20 erg g -1 s -1. C burning;   > 10 17 erg g -1 s -1. He burning;   ~ 10 12 erg g -1 s -1.

brie
Télécharger la présentation

Late Burning Stages

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Late Burning Stages

  2. Late Burning Stages

  3. Late Burning Stages

  4. Late Burning Stages

  5. Late Burning Stages • QHe~QC+C~QO+O but He>> C+C >> O+O O burning;  > 1020 erg g-1 s-1 C burning;  > 1017 erg g-1 s-1 He burning;  ~ 1012 erg g-1 s-1 If  = 99.9% of C+C rate of burning must be 1000x rate for 3 to produce same  to support star - fuel used up in 1/1000 of the time

  6. Carbon burning •  ~ 1010 s • Tignition ~6x108K (core), 1x109K (shell) •  ~ 105 g cm-3 • SR ~ 0.4 (core), 1.5 (shell) •  (neutron excess) ~ 2x10-3 • before C burning cores evolve at ~ constant SR - T3 •  cooling reduces entropy, esp. at low mass where degeneracy pressure prevents compressional heating • low masses have small C flash

  7. Carbon burning • Several reaction channels • 12C(12C,)20Ne • 12C(12C,p)23Na • 12C(12C,n)23Mg at high T • 12C(12C,)24Mg small branching fraction • Other relevant reactions • 22Ne(,n)25Mg • n excess in 22Ne & 18O ends up in 23Na, 25Mg, 26Mg, 27Al, & trans-Fe weak s-process below peak at N=50 (Cu, Ni, Zn, Ga, Ge, As, Se) • 16O & 20Ne are most abundant species at C exhaustion ~ 90%

  8. Neon burning •  ~ 3x107 s • T9 ~ 1.5 •  > 105 g cm-3 • SR ~ 0.1-0.2 (core), 1.5 (shell) •  (neutron excess) ~ 2x10-3 • Ne ~ 1/3C+C, XNe ~ 30% - this is not a major burning stage

  9. Neon burning • 20Ne(,)16O primary channel - photodisintegration, not fusion, is the primary process for this stage • 20Ne(,)24Mg also occurs • At end mostly 16O with 5-10% 24Mg & 28Si • small change in  • neutron excess mainly in 27Al, 29Si, 31P

  10. Oxygen burning •  ~ 2x107 s • T9 ~ 2 •  ~ 106 g cm-3 • SR ~ 0.1-0.2 (core), 1.5 (shell) •  (neutron excess) ~ 6x10-3 in core, much higher than solar - this material can’t get out of star •  ~ 3x10-3 in shell since S higher  lower  e- capture less common

  11. Oxygen burning • O burning more about competing processes • 16O(16O,)32S dominates at low T • 16O(16O,p)31P • 16O(16O,n)31S • 16O(16O,)28Si dominates at T9 > 2.8 • 16O(16O,2)24Mg • 24Mg(,)28Si •  moves into 34S • 28Si & 32S dominate at end, but significant abundances of other species

  12. Silicon Burning? • Not as such, in the sense of 28Si + 28Si  56Ni • More a matter of knocking ’s off of some things and capturing them onto others • Different from other burning stages • Many competing processes • Rates are very fast • Reverse rates are important, I.e. rate[40Ca(,)44Ti]  rate[44Ti(,)40Ca] - more common at high A where Q values are small, prevents complete burning • Abundances reflect the available phase space • equilibrium between these various reactions depends on T,,Ye

  13. QSE & NSE • calculate abundances from chemical potentials in the usual thermodynamic way • Minimize free energy of the ensemble • derivative of free energy = chemical potential • Yi(T,,Yl) for thermal equilibrium, where Yl is the ratio of leptons to nucleons • if ’s can escape (usually the case) use Yeinstead, where Ye is the usual e- fraction Y(e-) - Y(e+) • This is Nuclear Statistical Equilibrium (NSE) • Usually holds at T9 > 5

  14. QSE & NSE • calculating NSE • nucleus (Z,A) connected to (Z-1,A-1) by (,p), (p,) • so (Z,A) = (Z-1,A-1)+p • similarly, (Z,A) = (Z,A-1)+n • use recursion relations to get (Z,A) = Zp + (A-Z)n,  = 2(p + n) • Iterate to get abundances for all elements in network

  15. QSE & NSE • Now assume conditions are such that no equilibrium link exists between two groups of nuclei because T or  are too low • Si burning at T9 = 3-4 • -rich freezeout in SNe (more later) • BB nucleosynthesis • Each equilibrium group can be treated like NSE with a pivot nucleus instead of p,n. The nucleus (Z1,A1) is arbitrary • (Z,A) = (Z1,A1) + (Z-Z1)p + (A-A1-Z+Z1)n

  16. QSE & NSE in stars • As T, increase, equilibrium shifts from 28Si in a QSE process dominated by  captures up through intermediate mass nuclei (Ca,Ti,Cr,Mn) to Fe peak • If 28Si  Fe peak faster than timescale for weak reactions ( decay, ec) (explosive) • 56Ni (Z=N) which decays to 56Fe if T is low • 54Fe+2p if T high so  drive off 2p • If 28Si  Fe peak slow (~105 s, T9 ~ 3.5 - Si burning)  goes up & equilibrium settles on nuclei w/ • =7x10-2  54Fe, =0.1  56Fe

  17. QSE & NSE in stars • At very high T photodisintegration important & equilibrium shifts back to lower A • Also occurs for very high  • Dominant nuclei change from 56Ni  54Fe  56Fe  58Fe  54Cr +  • At T9 > 5 or Ye < 0.497 28Si  54Fe instead of 56Ni • for typical conditions in stellar cores 54Fe/56Fe ~ 15, while solar value is 0.061 • Neutron rich material in core doesn’t get out - 56Fe comes from decay of Z=N 56Ni

  18. QSE & NSE in stars • At T9 > 5 or Ye < 0.497 28Si  54Fe instead of 56Ni • 28Si  56Ni is exothermic, 28Si  54Fe strongly endothermic • Nuclear stability peaks at A = 56 • means Fe peak at peak of binding energy curve - requires energy to go to either heavier or lighter nuclei • no energy production - no hydrostatic support

  19. Dynamics of Shell Burning • The standard way of describing shell burning is the onion-skin model • Happy, well-adjusted, concentric layers of burning products • Each region has a spherical layer where the appropriate species is consumed, driving a narrow convective shell which lasts until all of the fuel goes away, then a new shell starts outside

  20. Dynamics of Shell Burning • A still life is a poor representation of a star

  21. Dynamics of Shell Burning • Caveats about 2D vs. 3D simulations: • Vortex pinning in 2D gives cyclonic behavior • amplitudes are ~ 10x too large

  22. Dynamics of Shell Burning • For early burning stages the conventional pictures gives more or less the right structure even though it’s missing physics • for late stages though…

  23. Dynamics of Shell Burning • for late stages though the behavior is fundamentally different • convective shell separated by radiative layers with step-like composition changes is wrong picture • Entire shell burning region of star is dynamically connected & probably materially as well

  24. Dynamics of Shell Burning • wave velocities comparable to convective velocities - Fwaves > Frad, correlated on large spatial scales • for SR = 1.5,  ~ 1.34 - star is only marginally stable - large displacements • entire region subject to non-linear instabilities & mixing • radial displacements of >10% - large asymmetries w/ low order modes • center of mass may not coincide w/ geometric center

  25. Dynamics of Shell Burning • material may be drawn all the way from C layer to Si layer • C-rich material will burn at the appropriate T at a given radius - energy generation will make the parcel buoyant, turn it around • Shell burning region consists of streamers of material potentailly traversing entire region which flash-burn at conditions depending on composition • energy generation not spherical - positive feedback when large plume ingests fuel • effect on nucleosynthesis, Urca,  cooling

More Related