330 likes | 610 Vues
Learning Objectives. To better understand how the work environment affects physicians and patientsTo learn more about the MEMO projectTo see how gender, race, and ethnicity interact with working conditionsTo realize the impact of a hectic or chaotic work environment. Background. Physician Worklif
E N D
1. MEMO Minimizing Error, Maximizing Outcome The Physician Worklife Study II Mark Linzer, UW, Principal Investigator
Mark Schwartz, NYU, Co-PI
Linda Baier Manwell, UW, Project Director
2. Learning Objectives To better understand how the work environment affects physicians and patients
To learn more about the MEMO project
To see how gender, race, and ethnicity interact with working conditions
To realize the impact of a hectic or chaotic work environment
3. Background Physician Worklife Study I (PWS)
Funded by Robt Wood Johnson Found, 1995-1998
National, random sample of 5,704 MDs
Stratified by five specialties
Findings
Time pressure is major source of stress/dissatisfaction
Stress and dissatisfaction predict burnout and intent to leave
Work control is powerful predictor of satisfaction
Burnout is 60% higher in women MDs
4. What is MEMO?
5. MEMO Conceptual Model
6. MEMO Data Collection Points
7. Measuring Quality
8. Determining Errors Clinicians reported errors in disease management during past year
Clinicians rated their stress & predicted likelihood of making future errors on the OSPRE (Occupational Stress and PReventable Error) instrument
Researchers performed confidential chart reviews
9. 420 primary care physicians (85.2% of target 500)
59.2% of those surveyed responded
51% GIM 49% FP
44% female
83% white
83% full-time
Age 44 (range 29-89) Physician Participants
10. MEMO Results: Measures
11. MEMO Results: MD Outcomes Of 420 physicians...
79% highly satisfied with their jobs
61% said jobs were stressful
53% need more time for physical exams
27% burning out or burned out
31% moderately or more likely to leave job within 2 years
12. MEMO Results: Organizational Culture Predict job satisfaction:
Work control (.001)
Trust in the organization (.001)
Resource availability (.001)
Less clinic chaos (.001)
Predict poorer MD mental health:
Fewer resources (.001)
Less work control (.006)
More clinic chaos (.001) Predict future error:
Less clinic emphasis on information (.017)
Less clinic emphasis on diversity (.001)
Predict intent to leave:
Less trust in the organization (.001)
Fewer resources (.001)
13. Describe the atmosphere in your office MEMO Results: Chaos in the Clinic
14. Chaotic offices are associated with:
More minority patients
More patients with public or no insurance
Fewer exam rooms
Fewer staff
Less practice emphasis on communication
Less practice emphasis on information technology MEMO Results: Chaos in the Clinic
15. Impact of Chaos on MDs
16. Perceived Leadership Integrity Index (PLII)
Attitudes of organizational leaders to (e.g.)
physicians core values
controlling costs vs. quality
Negative perceptions about perceived integrity correlated with physician stress, burnout, and intent to leave the practice MEMO Results: Organizational Culture
17. MEMO Results: Gender Differences
18. Background The 1995-98 Physician Worklife Study found
Women MDs have more
female patients
complex patients
managed care, uninsured, and Medicaid patients
Women MDs have less work control
All MDs need more time than allotted to see patients, but women need a greater percentage
Burnout was 60% higher in women physicians
21. Despite widespread dissemination of similar data, assessments of organizational climate and worklife by women MDs continue to be lower compared to males, and in many areas have worsened.
Non-alignment of values may explain lower perceptions of work control and higher levels of stress and burnout among women MDs.
Women MDs and their patients remain at higher risk for the effects of stress and poor working climates.
22. MEMO Results: Effect of the Workplace on Healthcare Disparities
28. Patient outcomes (n=1785, ave 4/MD)
Focus groups in minority clinics to identify factors that create barriers to quality care and exacerbate disparities
Focus groups in high quality clinics to identify factors/processes that facilitate quality care and minimize disparities.
Development of Office and Work Life (OWL) tool MEMO: Current Activities
30. Next Steps for MEMO Analyses:
Patient outcomes
Regression analyses
Research: Practice Redesign
Preventing burnout
Ameliorating chaos
Improving work control
Facilitating communication (language, literacy)
31. Modifiable Factors Find ways to better manage resources to reduce disparities and improve physician and patient health.
Assess methods to reduce clinic chaos.
Study practices that accomplish a lot with few resources. Develop a tool kit for other practices to use.
32. Upcoming MEMO Papers MEMO main results paper!
Impact of the work environment on care quality and errors
Other upcoming papers:
Errors in primary care: prediction & relationship to quality
Role of physician gender in quality & errors
Effect of physician burnout on quality & errors
Managing an ambulatory practice: lessons from MEMO
Separate but unequal: where minority and non-minority patients receive primary care
33. MEMO Limitations Only primary care practices enrolled
Only 5 regions included (NYC and upper Midwest)
Self-reported data
34.
MEMO Staff
Jim Bobula
Marlon Mundt
Roger Brown
Carolyn Egan
Chicago Region
Anita Varkey
Bernice Man
Elizabeth Arce
Milwaukee Region
Ann Maguire
Barb Horner-Ibler
Laura Paluch MEMO Team