1 / 10

APNIC Policy SIG Report - March 2002: Key Discussions on IPv4 and IPv6 Address Policies

The March 2002 APNIC Policy SIG report highlights the key discussions from the fifth SIG held in Bangkok. It covers interim policies for IPv6, revisions of IPv4 policy documents, and updates on AS number policies and broadband guidelines. Key presentations included draft summaries on IPv6 policy options, issues derived from recent global discussions, and a consensus on initial allocation criteria. The report emphasizes the need for clearer registration policies and understanding of extensive address utilization. Contributions are welcome for future discussions.

brinly
Télécharger la présentation

APNIC Policy SIG Report - March 2002: Key Discussions on IPv4 and IPv6 Address Policies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 5th APNIC Address Policy SIGReport March 7, 2002 Takashi Arano Address Policy SIG Chair Asia Global Crossing APNIC Policy SIG

  2. History • 1st SIG:Korea, Mar. 2000 • 2nd SIG:Brisbane, Oct. 2000 • 3rd SIG: KL, Mar. 2001 • 4th SIG: Taipei, Aug. 2001 • 5th SIG: Bangkok, Mar. 2002 APNIC Policy SIG

  3. Agenda (IPv6) • IPv6 policy - Interim policy document • Summary of the draft • Anne Lord, APNIC • Recent discussion and proposal • Kosuke Ito, IPv6 Promotion Council of Japan • The editorial team of IPv6 global policy • Large space IPv4 trial usage program for future IPv6 deployment • Kosuke Ito, IPv6 Promotion Council of Japan APNIC Policy SIG

  4. Agenda (IPv4) • AS number policy • Anne Lord, APNIC • Revised IPv4 policy document – summary • Gerard Ross, APNIC • RFC2050 revision • Cathy Wittbrodt, Packet Design • Broadband WG updates - Cable/ADSL policy • Takashi Arano, BB WG co-chair • Amendment proposal: • Maemura Akinori, JPNIC IP Committee APNIC Policy SIG

  5. IPv6 Policy • Draft published by the editorial team last December • Issues identified in RIPE 41 and the global ML • Initial Allocation Criteria: consensus for the editorial team’s suggestion • see the next page • Use of HD ratio: Consensus • Requirement to LIR in sub-allocation: Consensus • General consensus for the whole draft with amendment about initial allocation criteria in AP region • Some editorial changes needed APNIC Policy SIG

  6. Initial Allocation Criteria in IPv6 policy • 776 sites in current draft are too high! • Editorial team suggests • Only LIR can get a /32, but not end users. • LIR is an IR that primarily assigns address space to the users of the network services that it provides. • at least 200 assignments over the next two years • Be subject to be reclaimed if the requirements not satisfactory. APNIC Policy SIG

  7. AS Policy • Clarifying the current practices as a policy rather than creating a new policy. • Registration of routing policy was mandatory in the original draft, but the wording will be changed to “should be” • Consensus reached with the above amendment APNIC Policy SIG

  8. Broadband WG - Cable/ADSL guideline • Already two years passed since the first proposal • NO MORE DELAY • Three items remaining at Taipei meeting • Obligation of Customer list submission: Consensus is“should be optional” • Assignment Justification: keep the original proposal and continue to discuss in the ML(1:1 OK, larger needs justification) • Registration threshold: keep the original proposal (/29 and shorter need to be registered) • Proposals for changes from JP were rejected. RIR/NIR consideration for LIR’s address shortage during evaluation will be discussed more. • Draft guideline will be revised and published soon. APNIC Policy SIG

  9. Observations and Suggestions by Chair • Fewer presentations than before… • More Asian Pacific voices expected… • Everything in one day was tough • Why not have two slots in the first day and one slot in the next? • Any volunteer for co-chair? • New WG proposal? APNIC Policy SIG

  10. Thank you for your contributions !See you at Next APNIC Open Policy Meeting Any Question and Comments are welcome. Please Send e-mail to sig@apnic.net arano@gblx.ad.jp APNIC Policy SIG

More Related