1 / 10

14 years of PSI Policy and its impact

14 years of PSI Policy and its impact. Marc de Vries ( ePSI Platform) Madrid Conference Madrid 15 February 2012. Where do we come from?. Draft PSI Directive is a landmark Short overview of history and the patterns Impact PSI in total Sectors. Impact EU - Some highlights.

brody
Télécharger la présentation

14 years of PSI Policy and its impact

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 14 years of PSI Policyand its impact Marc de Vries (ePSI Platform) Madrid Conference Madrid 15 February 2012

  2. Where do we come from? • Draft PSI Directive is a landmark • Short overview of history and the patterns • Impact • PSI in total • Sectors

  3. Impact EU - Some highlights • 2006 – MEPSIR: 27 Billion euro (EU 27 + Norway) • 2008 – various studies: 28 Billion euro (EU 27) • 2011 – Vickery study (EU 27): • direct economic footprint 32 Billion euro (EU 27) • if marginal costs are implemented: 40 Billion • If indirect effects are included (innovation, social behaviour) • 2011 – POPSIS • Users and usage increase dramatically when marginal/zero costs • Cost recovery ratio own sales low (> 80% PSBs  less than 5%) • Costs PSB go down if re-use is ‘professionalized’, even if usage goes up • Extra tax returns and efficiciency gains outweigh loss of income

  4. Impact in sectors? • 2006 – MEPSIR: 27 Billion euro (EU 27 + Norway) • 2008 – various studies: 28 Billion euro (EU 27) • 2011 – Vickery study (EU 27): • direct economic footprint 32 Billion euro (EU 27) • if marginal costs are implemented: 40 Billion • If indirect effects are included (innovation, social behaviour) • 2011 – POPSIS • Users and usage increase dramatically when marginal/zero costs • Cost recovery ratio own sales low (> 80% PSBs  less than 5%) • Costs PSB go down if re-use is ‘professionalized’, even if usage goes up • Extra tax returns and efficiciency gains outweigh loss of income

  5. Impact in sectors? • What happened in PSI value chain? • Comparison 1998 – 2012 • Value chains of 3 sectors, you must guess… Create (produce, collect, compile) Collect, compile Distribute Re-use Public task domain Public task domain Outside public task Outside public task

  6. Legal information value chain Produce Collect, compile Distribute Re-use 1998 1998: • Creating legislation is by definition public task • Traditionally only production was considered public task • Power was with distributors: owned compilation process and distribution platforms • Re-users: small and rich, no clustering of demand • High entry barriers, no substitutes WHAT HAPPENED? • Government took step forward, changed perception of public task • Pushed publishers forward in value chain, no charges Produce Collect, compile Distribute Re-use 2012

  7. Traffic information/topographic information value chain Produce Collect, compile Distribute Re-use 1998 1998 • Public sector body monopolies, hardly private sector involvement WHAT HAPPENED? • Technology allows for non public sector parties to do sourcing • Up + down stream competition between public sector and market parties • Even internal public sector users switch to market parties products • public task charachter has become questionable • Only specific use within government justifies information to be PSI (defence, weather, public safety) Produce Collect, compile Distribute Re-use 2012 Produce

  8. Meteo information value chain Produce Collect, compile Distribute Re-use 1998 1998 • High value data, mass consumption • Public task charachter case clear • Also, infrastructural investments and international set up disallow private sector to step in up stream market, so no upstream competition WHAT HAPPENED? • Division between NMI’s that have stepped out and those that stay in • Distinction between professional and mass markets (down stream) • Integrators has power over (other mass) distribution channels • Fierce competition in professional markets Produce Collect, compile Distribute Re-use professional M 2012 Re-useconsumer M

  9. conclusions • There is no such thing as PSI • Impact Directive depends on shift power in value chain it will bring about and technology • Pockets of PSB market activities remain (meteo + cadastral information) • General rules of competition law remain to have role in other parts of value chain • Demarcation of public task is essential

More Related