120 likes | 255 Vues
This document outlines the USAF Tower Simulator Program, detailing its history and mission need statements from 1989. The program includes a comprehensive review of current product offerings such as desktop, large screen, and virtual reality simulators, with insights into their advantages, disadvantages, and costs ranging from $40K to over $1M. Additionally, it discusses future funding requirements through FY05, strategic options for maintaining simulator compliance, and the challenges faced in securing funding and support from MAJCOMs.
E N D
USAF Tower Simulator Program POC: Maj Mike Egan AFFSA OL-A DSN 478-9328
Overview • History • Status • Existing Products • The Road Ahead
Program History • Mission Need Statement - 89 • Concept Study - Apr 95 • CONOPS - Jul 95 • ORD I - Feb 96
Funding 3600 (R&D) 3080 (Procurement) • FY 02 $3.2M • FY 03 $2.2M $6.8M • FY 04 $14.5M • FY 05 $21.4M
Existing Products • Desktop • Large Screen • Virtual Reality
Desktop Simulators • CD-ROM to Multi-PC Design • Fixed Airports & Scenarios to any design • $40 to $100K+
Desk Top Simulators • Advantages • Small size • Relative cost • Disadvantages • Lack of realism • Limited scenarios • Lack of trainee interface with console equipment
Large Screen Simulators • Scalable from single to several positions • 1800 to 3600 Field of View • Scenarios and airfield design to match needs • Pseudo-pilot/voice recognition • $200K to $1M+
Large Screen Simulators • Advantages • Fairly realistic • Scenarios to meet needs • Voice recognition • Trainee interface with console equipment • Disadvantages • More costly • Larger size • Limited vertical FOV
Virtual Reality Simulators • Single position • 3600 field of view with full vertical view • Scenarios and airfield design to match needs • Pseudo-pilot/preset scenarios • ~ $100K
Virtual Reality Simulators • Advantages • Relative cost • Small size • Realistic • Scenarios to meet needs • Easily Scalable • Disadvantages • Lack of trainee interface with equipment • Single position only • No voice recognition
The Road Ahead • Challenge: No funding until ‘02 • Game Plan: • Option 1 • Evaluate existing products for ORD compliance • Below threshold reprogramming to obtain ‘01 funding • MAJCOM support • Option 2 • Traditional, accelerated path • Position ourselves for fallout • MAJCOM support • ORD Review/Verification