Understanding Regionalisation of Politics: Insights from European Citizens on Political Participation
220 likes | 355 Vues
This study explores how citizens across various European regions, including Austria, France, Germany, Spain, and parts of the UK, understand and engage in regionalised politics. Using a standardized questionnaire, it assesses political participation, social solidarity, and territorial identity in the context of regional versus national government influence. Findings indicate a preference for regional political engagement, yet a strong sentiment for statewide solidarity, revealing complex dynamics of identity and interregional relationships. The implications of these insights on governance and citizen agency in political processes are significant.
Understanding Regionalisation of Politics: Insights from European Citizens on Political Participation
E N D
Presentation Transcript
CANSAN INITIAL OVERVIEW CHARLIE JEFFERY University of Edinburgh
Regionalisation of Politics • How far do citizens understand/practice a regionalised politics? • Instead of nationalisation? • As well as (interdependent with; autonomous of nationalised politics)? • Standard questionnaire → data on 3 regions Austria, France, Germany, Spain, 2 regions UK • Regions chosen for variation on identity, powers, economy • Robustness of indicators across regional/national contexts?
Variables • Dependent • How far is political participation understood/practiced at regional scales? • How far is social solidarity understood/practiced at regional scales? • Independent • Territorial identity (within CANS) • Powers of regional govt (Marks et al?) • Regional economic disparities (?)
Identity: Attachment to Region % ‘very’ attached to region/state
Participation: Measures • Relative importance of regional vs. statewide electoral process • Voting; decisions of regional vs. state parliaments • Standard political efficacy measures • (UK) which does/which should have most influence? • (Germany) which more in touch with everyday concerns?
Participation: Voting • How important to vote in regional/state elections
Participation: Efficacy % agree/agree strongly ‘regional/state govt doesn’t care about what people like me think’
Participation: Does/Should Which level of govt does/which should have most influence? Here: % regional govt should/does
Participation: ‘Concerned’ • % think regional/state govt is more concerned about ‘worries and needs’ of the people
Participation: In Sum • Clearly a multi-level political citizenship, both-and • Voting at state level generally more important (except Scotland, Catalonia) • Scotland and Catalonia keenest on regional-scale participation • CLM, Lower Saxony, Vienna least keen • ALL except CLM think regional govt should have ‘most influence’, more in touch, more influenceable • Weight of opinion clearly to the ‘more powers’ side of status quo • Endorsement of more ‘proximate’ govt • Not much obvious variation by identity, powers, disparities • Often clearly national patterns
Solidarity: Measures • Definition of ‘solidarity community’ – with whom do we most closely share interests, regional vs statewide community? • Openness to territorial policy variation – more open, then less concerned about statewide equity? • Measures of statewide/interregional solidarity
Solidarity Community • How close to people in region/state as a whole?
Solidarity: Policy Variation #1 Which level of govt should be responsible for the environment?
Solidarity: Policy Variation #1 • Which level of govt should be responsible for fighting unemployment?
Solidarity: Policy Variation #1 • Which level of govt should be responsible for education?
Solidarity: Policy Variation #2 • Uniformity vs. matter for region to decide • Unemployment benefits, student fees, old age care, juvenile offenders • Generally (large) majorities for uniformity • Catalonia the exception – except juvenile offenders majority for Catalan decision • Scotland>Wales>Galicia>Bavaria substantial minorities for regional decision • Austria uniform, very high preference for uniformity (Germany except Bavaria, France not far behind)
Solidarity: Disparities • Central govt to intervene to even out regional economic disparities? • All majority agree; here % disagree
Solidarity: Interregional • Rich regions transfer to poor to ensure uniformity • % disagree
Solidarity: In Sum • Scotland, Wales, Catalonia, Galicia (Bavaria): outliers on solidarity community, policy variation • But otherwise (and general) preference for state-level competence and uniform provision • Rich-poor differentiation on disparities and equalisation • But: general preference for measures to ensure equity • Social citizenship still, but significantly less multi-levelled
In Sum • General preference for more political participation at regional scale • General preference for social solidarity at statewide scale • But with some indications that identity differentiates solidarity community, as does relative economic performance • Main differentiation by state, national patterns • Some evidence that identity works cross-nationally to regionalise (public attitudes towards) politics (UK, Spain) • Preferences in contradiction! • Different scales of political action allow expression of different aspects of citizenship