1 / 6

Context: Discuss leadership opportunities for DQMC and MEPRS Managers

LEADERSHIP IN DATA QUALITY AND MEPRS Mr. Joe Marshall Deputy Chief for Resource Management/Comptroller. Context: Discuss leadership opportunities for DQMC and MEPRS Managers

buffy
Télécharger la présentation

Context: Discuss leadership opportunities for DQMC and MEPRS Managers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LEADERSHIP IN DATA QUALITY AND MEPRSMr. Joe MarshallDeputy Chief for Resource Management/Comptroller

  2. Context: Discuss leadership opportunities for DQMC and MEPRS Managers • Purpose: Provide leadership discussion and techniques to help prepare MEPRS and DQ Managers to handle situations within the business day • Outcome: Improved understanding and execution of responsibilities and reporting requirements FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

  3. Leadership • Policy Compliance • Follow guidance and procedures in higher authority references • DODM 6010-13 MEPRS Manual • Navy Medicine MEPRS Processing Policy • Example: Reference policy requirements regarding activation/deactivation of work centers • Minimum monthly workload (10 admission/30 visits) • Assigned staff • Funding • Square footage • Teamwork • Use root cause analysis • Cooperation (Don’t make it personal) • Report to the Chain of Command • Everything is not always good • Professional Response/Reports • It’s about the programs (NOT Us vs. Them) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

  4. Cost vs. Benefits • Issue: MHS funding is derived from cost per care, +70% of the cost is attributed to labor. Cost per visit is inflated when timecard submissions are over-stated. • Cost: Validation of time and attendance labor reporting. • Benefit: Labor, workload and expenses recorded to the proper functional cost center ensures accurate cost. • Issue: Accurate Other Health Insurance data increases the ability to optimize reimbursement. • Cost: Updating and validation of Other Health Insurance information by clinic personnel. • Benefit: Maximize Third Party Collection revenues. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

  5. Best Practices • Implementation of PETR-A and R2DQ in MEPRS Processing has resulted in a 90% improvement of EAS transmissions and a tremendous decrease in overall Navy MEWACs outliers. • NHC Quantico DDFM 2569 Validation Process and E-OHI Discovery – Partnering with NMC Portsmouth • NH Bremerton: DDFM 2596 success = 53% of the FY12 Collection Goal FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

  6. Questions? FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

More Related