1 / 12

Third Compliance Monitoring Report

Third Compliance Monitoring Report. Vivi Mathiesen Florence Forum, Florence 13 Dec 2010. Regional and interregional coordination (CM GL point 3). Increased compliance since 2nd Report Progress due to Regional Initiatives Shortcomings with regard to interregional coordination of CM methods

buffy
Télécharger la présentation

Third Compliance Monitoring Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Third Compliance Monitoring Report Vivi Mathiesen Florence Forum, Florence 13 Dec 2010

  2. Regional and interregional coordination (CM GL point 3) • Increased compliance since 2nd Report • Progress due to Regional Initiatives • Shortcomings with regard to interregional coordination of CM methods • Recently launched projects not included

  3. Limitation of cross-border capacity (point 1.7 of CM GL) • Increased compliance – however unclear interpretation • Need to specify information requirements to ensure capacity is not unduly limited

  4. Intraday (point 1.9 of CM GL) • Higher compliance than 2nd Report • Intraday trading 17 of 31 interconnectors • Ten concrete intraday projects planned 2011 • Coordination of ID trading arrangement – topic for next compliance monitoring

  5. Transparency (point 5.5 of CM GL) • Higher level of compliance • RI: regional transparency monitoring • Areas of low compliance • Forecast of renewables (wind and solar) • Publication of outages grid, generation or consumption • Requirements for reporting to be specified

  6. Use of congestion incomeArt. 6.2 of the Regulation • Most common use – reduction of tariffs • Need clarification on how to verify use of congestion income

  7. Recommendations I • ERGEG recommends that EC: • Clarify provisions – to reduce ambiguity • Ensures swift comitology process • FG CACM and related Codes as well as comitology guidelines

  8. Recommendations II • ERGEG recommends Member States: • Implementation of EU energy legislation • Enforcement of legal framework that supports XB trading • Support Regional Initiatives • for pan-European market coupling • and coordinated congestion management

  9. Recommendations III • ERGEG requests that TSOs: • Fast development of CACM Network Codes • Continue committed work within RI • Enhance and speed up implementation of transparency as requested in FEDT • Ensure documentation of relevant procedures to NRAs

  10. Recommendations IV • Regulators are committed to: • Continuing to foster and support regional and interregional coordination of capacity allocation and congestion management • Ensuring that TSOs document relevant procedures and routines and send to NRA • Developing common procedures for compliance monitoring

  11. Thank you for your attention! www.energy-regulators.eu

  12. Methodology BACK-UP • ERGEG’s job is foremost coordination of NRA reponses • Bilateral and regional checks and quality control of data • Based on First and Second Compliance Monitoring Reports • ERGEG defined criteria for compliance • Consensus about criteria • Interpretation of legal provisions • Goes further than legal provisions • High score indicates compliance • Low score does not necessarily indicate non-compliance in a legal sense!

More Related