1 / 15

Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM)

Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM). November 24, 2009. Enhanced Monitoring Rule History. 1990 - CAAA requires EPA to publish monitoring rules for major sources 1992 - EPA proposes Enhanced Monitoring rules CEMS based All major sources subject 1995 - EPA changes direction

kybanez
Télécharger la présentation

Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Compliance Assurance Monitoring(CAM) November 24, 2009

  2. Enhanced Monitoring Rule History • 1990 - CAAA requires EPA to publish monitoring rules for major sources • 1992 - EPA proposes Enhanced Monitoring rules • CEMS based • All major sources subject • 1995 - EPA changes direction • Reasonable Assurance of Compliance • Focus on add-on control devices

  3. What is the CAM rule? 40 CFR Part 64 - Compliance Assurance Monitoring • Implements the monitoring design principle for a reasonable assurance of compliance • Targets facilities with add-on control devices • Requires source owners to design monitoring to fit site and incorporate into permits

  4. What are CAM design criteria? Build on current requirements and practices: • Select representative control device operational parameters (e.g., temperature, flow, pressure drop, electrical voltages, component concentration); • Establish indicator ranges for reasonable assurance of compliance • Accounting for site-specific factors such as margin of compliance, emissions control variability, correlation with emissions, • Relying on design information, historical data, similar sources, test data; and • Establish data collection method and averaging time.

  5. Who is affected by CAM? Rule applies to each pollutant-specific emissions unit (PSEU) that: • Is located at major source subject to Title V operational permits program, and • Is subject to emission limitation and has a control device to meet that limit (e.g., ESPs, scrubbers, fabric filters), and • Has precontrol emissions >major source size threshold (e.g., >100 tons/year uncontrolled emissions).

  6. Who is exempt from CAM? • Exemptions are by rule type, not facility type: • Acid rain rules, • Post-1990 EPA rules, • Rules with continuous compliance determination methods (e.g., Da facilities for SO2). • One exemption exception: Municipally-owned peaking units.

  7. What does source owner do with monitoring results? Use the data to assure and assess compliance with applicable requirements by: • Operating control device(s) within designated CAM or other indicator ranges, and • Responding to excursions, excess emissions, deviations with appropriate corrective action; and • Operating other control measures in accordance with applicable conditions.

  8. Defining Excursions and Exceedances • Exceedance – condition detected by monitoring (in units of pollutant emissions) that emissions are beyond limit • Excursion – departure from indicator range established in accordance with part 64

  9. Elements of a CAM Plan

  10. Outline of Requirements • Background information • Monitoring approach description and level of detail • Justification and support

  11. Basic Background • Emissions unit (Pollutant Specific Emissions Unit - PSEU) • Applicable regulations, emission limits, and monitoring requirements • Control technology (e.g., control device (CAM), compliance fuel or raw material, process controls, operation and maintenance protocols)

  12. Monitoring Approach • Measurement method (what and how) • Monitoring frequency and averaging procedures • Excursion or exceedance definition (indicator range for CAM) • Performance criteria – QA/QC procedures

  13. Other Factors • Commitment to corrective action • Reporting and recordkeeping • Verification of operational status • QIP Threshold (optional) • Data availability (optional) • Table format (for clarity in permit)

  14. Justification • Brief description of source/control device • Rationale for selecting indicators • Rationale for selecting indicator ranges • Supporting information (e.g., test data, design factors, historical data, margin of compliance)

  15. Monitoring Approach–Title V Permit Table (example) Indicator Combustion T Outlet CO conc. Measurement approach Thermocouple CO CEMS Indicator range Excursion: <1500°F Excursion: >50 ppmv Data representativeness Installed in incinerator PS 4, 40 CFR 60, App. B chamber QA/QC Redundant t-couple and span gas Monitoring frequency Measure continuously Daily zero (+ 30F) Measure continuously (10 sec) Data collection Record continuously Record 1-min averages procedures on chart recorder by DAS (electronic) Averaging period None 1-hr average QIP threshold No more than six No more than 10 excursions excursions 15

More Related