1 / 11

School Based Management

School Based Management. Muna Meky Economist Africa Impact Evaluation Initiative. What is SBM?. Decentralization of authority from the ministerial level to the local/school level Responsibility and decision-making over school operations is transferred to: Principals Teachers

bunny
Télécharger la présentation

School Based Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. School Based Management Muna Meky Economist Africa Impact Evaluation Initiative

  2. What is SBM? • Decentralization of authority from the ministerial level to the local/school level • Responsibility and decision-making over school operations is transferred to: • Principals • Teachers • Parents Teacher Associations (PTA) • Community Management Committees • School Management Committees (SMCs)

  3. Types of Authority • Budget • Hiring & Firing of Teachers • Financial authority – school grants • Curriculum

  4. Why SBM? Goal: SBM to improve school quality & efficiency • Information • School Personnel, Needs of school • Incentives to Engage • Children in their community • Ability to Monitor • Direct involvement of parents & community in school

  5. SBM Interventions • SBM intervention tend to fall into two categories: • Information for Accountability • Empowerment / Support

  6. Information for Accountability • Type of information to provide • General Information / School Report • Specific information • Community learning student achievement scores (Liberia, India) • Spending on the Capitation Grants (Ghana) • Avenues of providing information • Radio Campaign (Benin) • Newspaper campaigns (Uganda)

  7. Support • Empower Community Members • Increasing linkages to district level (Kenya) • Capacity building (Mexico, Kenya) • Increasing their responsibilities • Ability to hire/fire teachers (Rwanda, Ecuador) • School grants + school development plans (The Gambia, Senegal, Niger, Mexico)

  8. Rwanda & Ghana • Introduction of fee free primary education where school fees were replaced by a per student capitation grant • Weakened mandate for parents to be involved • Increase in the need for increased monitoring due to money flowing directly to schools Interventions tested: • Ghana – information & capacity building • Rwanda – increasing power over contract teachers

  9. Evidence Base is Limited • Did the intervention improve: • Local level participation in education decision-making • School quality/student learning

  10. Kenya (de Laat, Kremer, Christel Vermeersch) • Teacher prize rewards by community representatives serving on the school committee • Committee members evaluation teacher & Nominate two teachers for prize Findings • Committee Member Changes • Meetings between committee members and parents increased in the final year, and program members were more likely to raise teaching matters and issues with teachers. • Composition of school committees, which became more educated and older

  11. Kenya (con’t) • Favoritism • Female teachers received significantly higher evaluation scores than male teachers, even though male teachers were favored in the nominations • Non–neighbors received higher evaluation scores than neighbors but??? were favored in the nomination process. • Observables • Changed pedagogical techniques as teachers reduced in- class teaching efforts, increased homework. .

More Related