1 / 19

Anomalous Scattering: Theory and Practice

Anomalous Scattering: Theory and Practice. Andrew Howard ACA Summer School 29 July 2005. What is anomalous scattering?. Remember that the equation describing the spatial behavior of a wave is exp(i k • r ) What if the wavevector k were complex? k = k r + i k i

Télécharger la présentation

Anomalous Scattering: Theory and Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Anomalous Scattering: Theory and Practice Andrew Howard ACA Summer School 29 July 2005

  2. What is anomalous scattering? • Remember that the equation describing the spatial behavior of a wave is exp(ik•r) • What if the wavevector k were complex? • k = kr + i ki • Then the wave looks likeexp(-ki•r)exp(ikr•r): attenuation!

  3. So much for math. • Can we come up with a physical explanation? Sort of: • We state that atoms absorb photons and re-emit them with a phase change.

  4. What’s the phase change? • The phase change is in fact /2, and it’s positive; that is, the absorbed part leads the scattered part by 90º.

  5. How do write the atomic structure factors for this? • Remember that we conventionally write the atomic structure factors as f. • (We’ve emboldened this to remind you that it’s a complex number) • We now sayf = f0 + f’() + if”() if”() f’() f0

  6. The directions depend on (h,k,l)! • The f0 and f’() vectors turn around by 180 degrees when we change from (h,k,l) but the if”() doesn’t, so the resultant changes size and direction: f(h,k,l) f(-h,-k,-l)

  7. Thus: F(h,k,l) ≠ F(-h,-k,-l) ! • If there are few atoms with these properties, the differences will be small • But we can still look at F(h) - F(-h) as a tool in phasing

  8. How about wavelength? • Both f’ and f” are wavelength-dependent • f’ and f” are related by the Kramers-Kronig relation, which amounts to saying that the f’ is the derivative of f”

  9. What happens near an absorption edge? • An absorption edge is an energy at which the absorption (f”) increases dramatically as a function of energy. • It’s the energy associated with liberating an electron from a shell (typically K or L) into the vacuum

  10. What does this look like? p r e r p e

  11. We want lots of signal: • F(h,p) - F(-h,p) best anomalous • F(h,p) - F(h,e) • F(h,p) - F(h,r) • F(h,e) - F(h,r) • Clever linear combinations of the above:Hendrickson, FA values

  12. How do we use these? • Algebraic formulations: Hendrickson and Smith, 1980’s • FA values gave maximal (?) use of data • Numerous structures solved that way • Probabilistic formulations: • Resemble standard MIR formulations • Phase probability distributions used • Most modern packages use these

  13. Why can’t we just look the energies up in a table? • The exact positions of the peak and edge depend substantially on the molecular environment of the scatterer • Bonds between the anomalous scatterer and neighbors often blue-shift the energy spectrum by ~1-2 eV(E/E ~ 10-4) • Tuning issues at the beamline may red-shift or blue-shift the spectrum

  14. Do you have to use the real sample? • It would be nice if you didn’t have to: • Crystal decay starts with the initial irradiation • You’d hope that two crystals with the same form will have the same spectrum • Sometimes the solvent will influence the spectrum, so it would be best if you did the spectrum on the real sample

  15. Which elements have good edges? • K edges are sharper than L edges • Often accompanied by a distinct “white line”, i.e. a narrow spectral peak in f”. • Some elements fit into normal beamline operations better than others:Mn, Fe, Cu, As, Se, Br (6.5-13.9 KeV) • L edges are easier to experiment on:rare earths, Pt, Au, Hg, Pb

  16. Ask your beamline people! • Some beamlines can do MAD but only for a limited range of edges • Some allow full user operation • Others require staff assistance for energy shifts • Recognize that the ultra-sharp edges (Se, As) are easy to miss

  17. Why is selenium so popular? • Because selenomethione is relatively easy to do in bacteria • There are even ways to do it in non-bacterial systems, but they’re trickier • Assures stoiochiometric inclusion in most cases • Check it with AA or MS if you can!

  18. Sulfur anomalous • Sulfur’s edge is too low to be useful • But f” is large even at 7-8KeV • Tradeoffs between conventional absorption and anomalous scattering power • High redundancy and careful data collection help a lot

  19. Conclusions • Anomalous scatter and MAD offer a superior approach to experimental phase determination • Automated software takes a lot of the drudgery out of this approach • Try it: you’ll like it.

More Related