1 / 107

Searching for Higgs Bosons at LHC (CMS emphasis)

This article discusses the search for Higgs bosons, with a focus on the CMS experiment at LHC. It covers new analysis developments and discovery potential, as well as background data and advanced generators for multi-jet events. The article also provides information on SM and MSSM Higgs bosons, including Higgs couplings and production cross sections.

cacree
Télécharger la présentation

Searching for Higgs Bosons at LHC (CMS emphasis)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Searches for the Higgs boson(s) at LHC (emphasize on CMS)A. Nikitenko, IC, London. On leave from ITEP, Moscow CERN, Building 40 ATLAS CMS LHC Days in Split, 2-8 October 2006

  2. New Analysis Developments from CMS http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/cpt/tdr/ • CERN/LHCC 2006-001 CERN/LHCC 2006-021 • Published submitted to LHCC

  3. CMS PTDR vol.2 was submitted to LHCC in 20th of June (2006) • Discovery potential for the Higgs boson(s) was updated in comparison with Higgs Summary CMS Note 2003/033 : • Latest trigger table • Background from “data”, exp. systematics • Advanced generators for multi-jet events: ALPGEN, MadGraph, CompHEP, TopRex • almost all analyses use full G4 simulation data • L = 2 x 1033cm-2s-1

  4. Cont. • NLO cross sections was used for Higgs boson production and backgrounds (when available) • SM Higgs boson: HDECAY, HIGLU, VV2H, V2HV, HQQ. Summary Tables provided by M. Spira. Table withPDF uncertainties of s (H) provided by A. Djouadi • MSSM Higgs bosons: FeynHiggs2.3.2. by S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, G. Weiglein. • MSSM H+ production cross sections: NLO pp->tH+ provided by T. Plehn • Most of the background NLO cross sections provided by John Campbell; MCFM package • Introductions in Higgs sections are written by • M. Spira for SM and MSSM • S. Heinemeyer and G. Weiglein for MSSM benchmark scenarios + rad. corrections for mh • D. Dominici for 5D RS and M. Raidal for Little Higgs model

  5. Layout • Introduction • Part I: Higgs boson searches in Standard Model • Part II: Higgs bosons searches in MSSM • if still have time, Part III: • Higgs searches in non SUSY models • Conclusions

  6. SM Higgs mass constraints from the data and theory Experiment SM theory Indirect constraints from precision EW data : MH < 260 GeV at 95 %CL (2004) MH < 186 GeV with Run-I/II prelim. (2005) MH < 166 GeV (2006, ICHEP06) The triviality (upper) bound and vacuum stability (lower) bound as function of the cut-off scale L “triviality” : Higgs self-coupling remains finite Direct limit from LEP: MH > 114.4 GeV

  7. Present Tevatron exclusion limit All CDF and DØ results now combined for the first time  mH Limit/SM (GeV)Exp. Obs. 115 7.610.4 130 10.1 10.6 160 5.03.9 180 7.5 5.8 Note: the combined result is essentially equivalent to one experiment with 1.3 fb-1, since both experiments have “complementary” statistics at low and high mass  we are indeed already close to the sensitivity required to exclude or “evidence” the higgs at the Tevatron ICHEP06

  8. NLO Mt from TeV 2005: Mt=172.7+/-2.9 GeV hep-ex/0507091 We use 175 GeV in PTDR

  9. SM Higgs boson couplings and Br. ratios Djouadi, Kalinowski, Spira tree level couplings v is vev of Higgs field = 246 GeV Right bottom plot includes uncertainties from the quark masses mt, mb, mc and as(MZ)

  10. Physics runs 2008-2009. First , we should “discover” Standard Model

  11. ~ 107-8 Z->ll, W->ln on tape for 10fb-1 J. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, D. Rainwater hep-ph/0308195 Z, W, tt cross sections and expected number of events after trigger in CMS with 10 fb-1 W/Z+nJ+X NLO predictions at LHC with cuts : pTl > 15 GeV |hl| < 2.4 pTj > 20 GeV |hj| < 4.5 DRlj > 0.4 DRll > 0.2 W/Z bb + X |hb| < 2.5 ~ 106 tt->m+X for 10 fb-1

  12. W/Z+nJets is very important background for Higgs at LHC Zbb,Zcc, Wbb, Wcc (W/Z+QQ+nj) are as important as W/Z+nj

  13. Part 1 SM Higgs boson searches. Rescaling for the light Higgs boson (h) in MSSM

  14. H->ZZ(*)->4l - golden mode of CMS(first studies in 1995) • Background: tt, ZZ, llbb (“Zbb”) • Selections : • lepton isolation in tracker and calo • lepton impact parameter, mm, ee vertex • mass windows MZ(*), MH H->ZZ->ee mm

  15. H->ZZ->4l • New elements of analysis: • ZZ background: NLO k factor depends on m4l • background from side bands or from ZZ/Z; (gg->ZZ is added as 20% of LO qq->ZZ, no generator yet) Signal and background at 5 sigma discovery eemm eemm CMS at 5s sign. CMS at 5s sign.

  16. H->ZZ->4l Signal significance: new vs old results; no big change ~ 125 GeV

  17. New: CP property with H->ZZ->4l d G (h) ~ H + h I + h2 A, H scalar, A – pseudoscalar, h=tan(x), x = +/- p/2 --> A C2 = s Br / sSM Br SM C2 needed to exclude SM h

  18. Inclusive H->gg CMS plot of the ECAL TDR time : December 1997 Went then from hybrid silicon + gas chamber tracker to all silicon tracker

  19. New elements of PTDR 2006 analysis: - splitting into categories depending of R9=E(3x3)/Esc and h regions - usage of LLR for discovery, systematic - “optimized analysis” – NN with kinematics and g isolation as input, s/b per event 1 fb-1 1 fb-1 barrel with large R9 barrel with small R9 1 fb-1 1 fb-1 endcaps with large R9 endcaps with small R9

  20. Discovery potential of H->gg SM light h->gg in MSSM inclusive search Significance for SM Higgs MH=130 GeV for 30 fb-1 * NN with kinematics and g isolation as input, s/b per event

  21. Accuracy of the Higgs boson mass measurement with H->ZZ->4l and H->gg Stat. error only

  22. Early discovery with H->WW->2l2n ...counting experiment... • New elements of analysis • PT Higgs and WW bkg. as at NLO (re-weighted in PYTHIA) • include box gg->WW bkg. • NLO Wt cross section after jet veto • Backgrounds from the data (and theory) • tt from the data; uncertainty 16% at 5 fb-1 • WW from the data; uncertainty 17% at 5 fb-1 • Wt and gg->WW bkg from theor. uncertainty 22% and 30% after cuts: - ETmiss > 50 GeV - jet veto in h < 2.4 - 30 <pT l max<55 GeV - pTl min > 25 GeV - 12 < mll < 40 GeV

  23. Discovery reach with H->WW->2l Excluded cross section times Branching Ratio at 95% C.L. CMS Phys. TDR 2006 very similar to old results w/o syst.

  24. Luminosity needed for 5 s discoveryfor incl. Higgs boson production

  25. (written in 2005)

  26. First, full simulation analysis ofqqH, H->tt->l+jet SM discovery light h in MSSM Discovery in Standard Model

  27. Summary of SM Higgs boson discovery: Signal Significance for 30 fb-1 with K factors ATLAS h->gg sensitivity is now comparable with CMS CMS ttH, H->bb does not have even 3 s with 60 fb-1

  28. Part 2 Higgs boson searches in Constrained MSSM

  29. Constraints on MSSM Higgs from LEP searches in mhmax scenario From hep-ex/0602042 mt= 169.3 174.3 179.3 183.0 Low tanb is not completely excluded: search for LHC with pp->A; A->Zh, gg, tt High tanb area for search at LHC with pp->bbf (f=h, H, A) and f->mm, tt decays

  30. Light SUSY Higgs in CPX (no CMS reach yet evaluated, ATLAS did scanning)

  31. CMS reach for MSSM neutral Higgs bosons • pp->bbf (f->h, H, A) – high tanb • f->mm • f->tt • pp->A at low tanb • A->Zh • Z->ll (l=e, m) • h->bb

  32. pp->bbf, f->mm Discovery reach at low MA, “intensive coupling” and decoupling regimes h+A H+A h+H+A Possible constraint on tanb by measuring width of A/H->mm

  33. pp->bbf, f->tt Tevatron f (f->tt) f=h, A, H CMS bbf (->tt, mm) f=h, A, H CMS Note 2003/033 plot below is updated (see next slides) ICHEP06 Exclusion Discovery/measurement

  34. Z->tt as benchmark for H->tt mass reconstruction Tevatron analysis of f->tt:Z->tt->l+jet is selected ! CDF Run II analysis; 310 pb-1; hep-ex/0508051 CMS, 2006 Z->tt->m+jet in CMS, 2006: S ~ 1000 ev, B: tt ~ 60 ev., W+j ~ 40ev. , bb ~ 60 ev. for 30 fb-1

  35. bbZ as benchmark for bbH kinematics Z+2 b-tagged jetsat CMS, 2006 Z + ≥1 b-tagged jetat Tevatron PRL 94, 161801 (2005) 1065 events under peak for 30fb-1 - 70 % signal bbZ - 11 % DY - 19 % tt~ pTb

  36. MSSM neutral Higgs bosons: TeV vs LHC CMS prospects for discovery Phys TDR 2006 CDF+D0 prospects

  37. tan(b) “measurement” with MSSM bbA Cross section (and width) exhibits a large sensitivity to tan(b) and thus can add a significant observable to a global fit of the SUSY parameters From cross section of A->tt From width measurement with A->mm • R. Kinnunen, S. Lehti, F. Moortgat, • Nikitenko, M. Spira. CMS Note 2004/027 • Need to be updated for PTDR 2006 results

  38. Access to low tanb with A/H->c20c20->4l + ETmiss • Background • SUSY, SM: tt, ZZ, Zbb • Selections: • Lepton isolation • Jet veto • ETmiss, pT4l < 80 GeV • Z veto Chosen points in mSUGRA Point C after selections

  39. Access to low tanb with A/H->c20c20->4l

  40. MSSM charged Higgs boson

  41. Selections 2006: ETmiss > 100 GeV ETtjet > 100 GeV t polarization: Rt = p ltr/Et jet > 0.8 Mtop + b tagging veto of 4th jet ETHiggs > 50 GeV

  42. The 5 s discovery reach of CMS 2003 for MSSM charged Higgs bosons with mhmax scenario. CMS Note 2003/033 NLO cross section for pp->tH-+X Gap at MH+ ~ Mt is artificial due to usage of gg->tt (NWA) cross section gg->tbH+ process is available in PYTHIA (S. Moretti et al. Les Houches 2003) NLO cross section is available. (T. Plehn et al., hep-ph/0312286)

  43. CMS reach in MA-tanbwith searches for charged Higgs boson CMS Phys. TDR 2006 Effect of systematic on discovery reach

  44. Summary of CMS reach in MA-tanb

  45. Can MSSM be distinguished from SM in the area of only light Higgs discovery ? discrepancy from the SM for light h M. Duhrssen et al.,hep-ph/04063232

  46. Part 3 Higgs boson searches in 5D RS model and Little Higgs model

  47. Free parameters of 5D Randall-Sundrum model: mf, mh, Lf, x (f-h mixing)

  48. Radion (f)->hh->ggbb, ttbb, bbbb search.motivation • CMS work by D. Dominici, G. Dewhirst, • Nikitenko, S. Gennai, L. Fano’ • CMS Note 2005/007 5D Randall-Sundrum model paramers: mf, mh, Lf, x • We fixed : • mf=300 GeV, mh=125 GeV • and scan in the • (x, Lf) plane • full simulation for signal: f->hh with • ggbb, ttbb, bbbb decay modes • fast simulation for background • MadGraph for • ggjj, ggcc, ggbb background • CompHEP for Zbb background • Signal with corrected PYTHIA • s, Br with modified HDECAY + HIGLU Lf = 2 TeV, mh = 125 GeV 30 fb-1 x f->ZZ->4l discovery no discovery for h->2g sBr(hSM->ZZ->4l) ~= sBr(f->ZZ->4l) mf, GeV X->hh discovery with ~ 30 fb-1 is a hint for radion

More Related