1 / 19

Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process

Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process. Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process. Objective. Identify a few low-cost, effective countermeasures for project development at candidate locations.

caia
Télécharger la présentation

Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process

  2. Objective • Identify a few low-cost, effective countermeasures for project development at candidate locations. • “Few” = Consider more than one low-cost countermeasure to provide flexibility for various conditions Suggestion • Have 1 or 2 higher cost countermeasures for special circumstances. Element 1, Step 3: Select Countermeasures

  3. Outcome • Short list of effective, low-cost countermeasures for focus crash type(s) and focus facilities. • Greater understanding of pros and cons of each countermeasure. Element 1, Step 3: Select Countermeasures

  4. Data Needs • No crash, roadway, or other specific data is utilized in this step of the process. • Do need an understanding of agency policies and practices, including how well a countermeasure has worked locally. Element 1, Step 3: Select Countermeasures

  5. Element 1: Step 3 Element 1, Step 3: Select Countermeasures

  6. Element 1: Step 3, Task 1Assemble Comprehensive List Purpose: • Develop a comprehensive list of safety countermeasures that could be appropriate for systemic deployment to target the focus crash type(s) on the prioritized network elements. Element 1: Step 3, Task 1

  7. Element 1: Step 3, Task 1 Assemble Comprehensive List Resources: • NCHRP Report 500 Series • Highway Safety Manual • FHWA’s Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse • FHWA illustrated guide sheets for intersection strategies • FHWA Office of Safety website • State or regional SHSPs • NHTSA’s Countermeasures that Work • Other applicable safety plans • Published research documenting the effectiveness of strategies Element 1: Step 3, Task 1

  8. Element 1: Step 3, Task 1Assemble Comprehensive List Process: • Consult resources to generate lists of countermeasures that addresses each focus crash type(s). Suggestion: • Place emphasis on low-cost, easy to implement countermeasures with proven effectiveness. • Select countermeasures appropriate for focus facility type Element 1: Step 3, Task 1

  9. Safety Strategies Overview NCHRP Report 500 • A series of guides to assist state and local agencies in reducing injuries and fatalities in targeted emphasis areas • The guides correspond to the emphasis areas outlined in the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. • Each guide includes a brief introduction, a general description of the problem, the strategies/ countermeasures to address the problem, and a model implementation process. Element 1: Step 3, Task 1

  10. Road Departure Strategies NCHRP Report 500 Element 1: Step 3, Task 1

  11. Other Resources– More Current – • HSM, Part D – Hundreds of countermeasures with CMFs. • CMF Clearinghouse – Searchable database updated regularly. • www.cmfclearinghouse.org • Countermeasures that Work – Enforcement and education countermeasures Element 1: Step 3, Task 1

  12. Element 1: Step 3, Task 2Evaluate & Screen Countermeasures Purpose: • Evaluate and screen the comprehensive list of countermeasures • Documented effectiveness (at reducing the target crash types) • Implementation and maintenance costs • Consistency with the agency’s policies, practices, and experiences. Element 1: Step 3, Task 2

  13. Element 1: Step 3, Task 2Evaluate & Screen Countermeasures Resources: • Highway Safety Manual • FHWA’s Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse • Published research documenting the effectiveness of strategies Element 1: Step 3, Task 2

  14. Element 1: Step 3, Task 2Evaluate & Screen Countermeasures Process: • Review resources to select the countermeasure(s) with the greatest potential to address the priority crash type(s) across the prioritized locations. • Eliminate the countermeasures with the low potential to address priority crash type(s), not consistent with agency practices, or not practical to implement/ maintain. • Finalize list of countermeasures. Option • Stakeholder input from multi-agency & multi-discipline workshop. Element 1: Step 3, Task 2

  15. Minnesota Rural County - Workshops Voting Results Element 1: Step 3, Task 2

  16. Element 1: Step 3, Task 3 Select Countermeasures for Deployment Process: • Select a few countermeasures (from the lists created in Step 3, Task 2) for each target crash type. • Assemble countermeasures to create short list of strategies for each target crash type. Include enough countermeasures to provide a measure of flexibility. Element 1: Step 3, Task 3

  17. Run-Off Road Countermeasures Element 1: Step 3, Task 3

  18. Intersection Countermeasures Dynamic Warning Signs Change Intersection Type Improve Sight Distance Street Lighting Enhanced Signing and Delineation Indirect Turns Element 1: Step 3, Task 3

  19. Pedestrian Countermeasures Countdown Timers and Advanced Pedestrian Intervals Curb Extensions and Medians Element 1: Step 3, Task 3

More Related