90 likes | 210 Vues
Juvenile incarceration has profound implications not just for the youth involved, but for families and society. The cost of juvenile detention is approximately $240 per day, contributing to financial burdens and family conflicts. With over 50% of incarcerated youth facing recidivism, it is crucial to address underlying causes such as impulsive behavior, substance use, and educational challenges. Our initiative focuses on educating parents, providing resources, and implementing mental health screenings, aiming to create a shift in how we approach juvenile delinquency to break the cycle.
E N D
Preventing "At Risk" Youth from Incarceration Juliana Gonzales Psychology Major/ Human Development California State University Monterey Bay Salinas Superintendent/Educators James A. Earhart
What is the problem? Juvenile incarceration=Costly Juvenile= future implications Families= family conflicts/financial burden State= 240/day/youth
What can we do to help? • Educating parents • Offering resources • Mental health screenings • Learning disability screenings • Substance awareness • Family interventions • Stop the stigma!
Why does it happen ? • Impulsive and risky behavior/ immature prefrontal cortex (Krebs, 2010)
Why does it happen? • Substance use, mental health issues, educational difficulties, family problems ( Howell et al., 1995)
What are the Implications? • An estimated less than 20% of youth who are incarcerated and then paroled, finish high school or attain their GED. (Abrams, Snyder, 2010) • 50% recidivism rate (Justice Policy institute, 2010) • About half of the states in the US have enacted the 3 strikes law/ age 16 can receive a strike on their record depending on the crime ( Stahlkopf, 2010)
Let’s make a change! • Without a change to the previous take on Juvenile Delinquency we are creating a vicious cycle!
References • Dobbs, D. (2011, October). Beautiful brains. National Geographic, 37-59. • Howell, J. C., Krisberg, B., Hawkins, J. D., & Wilson, J. J. (Eds.). (1995). A sourcebook:Violent and chronic juvenile offenders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Howell, J. C., (1996), Juvenile Transfers to the Criminal Justice System: State of the Art. Law & Policy, 18: 17–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1996.tb00163.x • Justice Policy Institute (2009). The costs of confinement: Why good juvenile justice policies make good fiscal sense. Washington, D.C. • Krebs, C., Lattimore, P., Cowell,A. Graham, P. (2010) "Evaluating the juvenile breaking the cycle program's impact on recidivism." Journal of Criminal Justice 38, 109-117.doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.02.008 • Stahlkopf, C., Males, M., & Macallair, D. (2010). Testing incapacitation theory youth crime and incarceration in california. Crime and Delinquency, 56(2), doi: 10.1177/0011128707307227 • Note: Bar graph on age of onset retrieved from: Retrieved from: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12480&page=50 • Images retrieved from Google Images