30 likes | 165 Vues
Engage in a dynamic Supreme Court simulation focusing on Cases 1 (Raj Singh) and 2 (Mitchell). Legal teams, comprised of petitioners and respondents, will research and analyze constitutional issues, providing a robust understanding of precedent and case law. Collaborate with your team to prepare a modified case brief to present to the justices by the start of class. This simulation emphasizes teamwork, critical thinking, and legal analysis, allowing participants to deepen their understanding of constitutional law and judicial processes.
E N D
Supreme Court Simulation Groups Case 1- Raj Singh/Free Exercise Case 2- Mitchell/Establishment Judges: Bazanhe Anastasia Vanessa Cory Lashawn Darneshia Xinya Lawyer Petitioner- Mitchell Jaylan Janaye Hannah Lawyer Respondent- James H.S. Amy Benjamin Kaylin • Judges • Christopher • Lauren • Orlando • Sebastian • Paige • Jesse • Lawyer Petitioner-Raj Singh • Claire • Klarissa • Alicia • Lawyer Respondent- Jones H.S. • Peyton • Kristi • Tatianna
Supreme Court Simulation Groups Lawyers Judges Check in: Precedent Work Class-work: Continue and complete precedent research on additional cases (See precedent chart). Be sure that you understand all of the facts, constitutional questions, and decisions! This information will be vital to your performance! Homework: Complete Guidelines for Analyzing a Constitutional Case using YOUR case (Case 1: Rajh Singh or Case 2: Mitchell) • Check in: Precedent Work • Class-work: Complete your “Modified Case Brief” in your teams. Each person is responsible for writing one, however the neatest and most clearly written one in the team will go to the justices of the case. (See Modified Case Brief Handout). This needs to be ready to give to the justices by the beginning of class on Tuesday. • Homework: Complete Guidelines for Analyzing a Constitutional Case using YOUR case (Case 1: Rajh Singh or Case 2: Mitchell )