1 / 31

Information in Afghanistan Brig Nick Pope UK A

Information in Afghanistan Brig Nick Pope UK A. UZBEKISTAN. KYRGYSTAN. TURKMENISTAN. CHINA. TAJIKISTAN. AGHANISTAN. IRAN. PAKISTAN. 2006 - A Year of Transitions. Stage 3. Stage 2. Stage 4. Feb. Mar. Apr. May. Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Stage 4 - TOA.

cala
Télécharger la présentation

Information in Afghanistan Brig Nick Pope UK A

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Information inAfghanistanBrig Nick Pope UK A

  2. UZBEKISTAN KYRGYSTAN TURKMENISTAN CHINA TAJIKISTAN AGHANISTAN IRAN PAKISTAN

  3. 2006 - A Year of Transitions Stage 3 Stage 2 Stage 4 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Stage 4 - TOA St3 (S) 31 Jul RAC-RC (N+W) 01 Jun RIP 04 May RIP 04 Feb RAC-RC (C) 06 Aug ISAF VIII ISAF IX ISAF X

  4. Nature of ISAF Operations • Transitional in Nature

  5. Operational Environment

  6. Operational Environment

  7. Operational Environment

  8. Nature of ISAF Operations • Transitional in Nature • Multi-Spectrum • Effects Based Approach (lethal/non-lethal) • Joint Air/Land Operations • Information Operations • Intelligence Led Offensive Operations

  9. Tactical Level HQ ISAF IX COM PIO POLAD DEVAD Media Advisor PRISM LEGAD DCOM Stab COS DCOM Sy DCOM Air DOS DCOS Sp DCOS Ops Dep DCOS Sp Ops Div Dir CJOC Dir CJOC Engr CJ2 CJ5 CJ7 JCEB LOC FPM CJ3 Air Ops Dir CJ9 C-IED OAB Info Ops Tgts CJ1 CJ4 CJ6 CJ8 CJMed

  10. Nature of ISAF Operations • Transitional in Nature • Multi-Spectrum • Effects Based Approach (lethal/non-lethal) • Joint Air/Land Operations • Information Operations • Intelligence Led Offensive Operations • Multi-Agency • Coalition Forces and Air Component • Government of Afghanistan • Afghan Security Forces • Non-Governmental Organisations • International Community

  11. Local Population Government of Afghanistan Afghan Security Forces Pakistan Military Reconstruction and Development Media

  12. OEF PSCs The Players Subordinate Commands ANSF Military Tri-Partite Commission NATO Media Pakistan National International ISAF Tribal Elders Neighbouring Countries Provincial Governors Government of Afghanistan International Community President ANSF UN NGOs Embassies Ministries OGDs

  13. OEF PSCs The InformationDemand Subordinate Commands ANSF Military Tri-Partite Commission NATO Media Pakistan National International ISAF Tribal Elders Neighbouring Countries Provincial Governors Government of Afghanistan International Community President ANSF UN NGOs Embassies Ministries OGDs

  14. OEF PSCs The CIS Supplied Subordinate Commands ANSF Military Tri-Partite Commission NATO Media Pakistan National International ISAF Tribal Elders Neighbouring Countries Provincial Governors Government of Afghanistan International Community President ANSF UN NGOs Embassies Ministries OGDs

  15. Nature of ISAF Operations • Transitional in Nature • Multi-Spectrum • Effects Based Approach (lethal/non-lethal) • Joint Air/Land Operations • Information Operations • Intelligence Led Offensive Operations • Multi-Agency • Coalition Forces and Air Component • Government of Afghanistan • Afghan Security Forces • Non-Governmental Organisations • International Community • Multi-National

  16. This is not a UK game

  17. Belgium Bulgaria Canada Czech Rep. Denmark Estonia France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Turkey UKUSA This is not a UK game GCTF(75) NATO(26) Armenia Bahrain Djibouti Egypt El Salvador Eritrea Ethiopia Fiji Georgia Greece Hungary Honduras India Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Moldova Mongolia Morocco Nicaragua Oman Pakistan Philippines Qatar Russian Fed Saudi Arabia Serbia-Montenegro Singapore South Korea Tajikistan Thailand Tonga Yemen Turkmenistan Ukraine UAE Uzbekistan ISAF(37) Albania Australia Austria Azerbaijan Croatia Finland Ireland Macedonia New Zealand Sweden Switzerland

  18. The CIS Reality • 20 mins to open a 2 Mb ppt file at subordinate HQs • Timesharing on User Terminals • Map overlays sent as powerpoint slides • C2 coordinated through e-mails, telephone calls and conferences • Staff dedicated to transferring data between various network domains • No IM discipline - Network servers at full capacity ISAF JOC May 06

  19. ISAF IX Approach to CIS • Create a digitised C2 environment • Improve quality, capacity and resilience of the networks • Mitigate risk wherever possible and actively drive NATO CIS projects • Establish a single C2 system before ISAF X • Exploit opportunities to use AFG capabilities • Guarantee ISAF IX success through deployment of UK resources to close NATO CIS capability gaps

  20. Information Management • Imposed HQ ARRC Electronic Working Practices as the IM model • Influenced HQ ISAF, but not the subordinate HQs • Underestimated: • Requirement for common IM protocols • Training and Education burden • System management burden • Scale of the task!

  21. NATO SECRET C2PC WISE JCHAT JOIIS Ibase ICC I2 Analyst WebTAS AIMS RFIMS CENTRIXS-GCTF C2PC IWS mIRC JADOC Functional Area Sub-Systems (FAS) • ISAF SECRET • C2PC • WISE/JOCWatch • JCHAT • JOIIS • IGeoSIT • Macromedia Breeze • TeamSpeak2 • Logrep • Tasker Tracker • IMSA • JADOCs (NATO eyes only)

  22. The NEC Vision? ISAF CJOC Feb 07 ISAF JOC May 06

  23. UZBEKISTAN KYRGYSTAN TURKMENISTAN CHINA TAJIKISTAN HELMANDSHIRE IRAN PAKISTAN

  24. KANDAHAR

  25. LASHKAR GAH

  26. CAMP BASTION

  27. ISTAR in Abundance E-8C JSTARS HARRIER GR 7/9 RQ-4 GLOBAL HAWK RIVET JOINT NIMROD R1 / MR 2 U 2 R DRAGON LADY HERMES 450 LUNA MQ 1 PREDATOR

  28. UK Complexity! UK J2 (TOP SECRET) JOCS SG, LYCHGATE UK C2/J3/J5 (SECRET) JOCS GS, RAFCCIS NATO (SECRET 26 EYES) ISAF (SECRET 37 EYES) COALITION C2 (SECRET 76 EYES!) UK J1/J4 (RESTRICTED/UNCLAS) COMIS / CSUPS / DEMAS / GLOBAL / JPA / LITS MMARS / OLIVER / OMIS / OSCAR / RYAN / RIS / TAV TELEMED / UNICOM / USAS / VITAL / WRAM Etc Etc The Information was available – but where? Ground Truth?

  29. Thoughts • Get the communications network infrastructure right • Initial investment is critical • Capacity and Volume are the pre-requisites • Apply network interoperability standards • Accept (but understand better) the reality of the hierarchical, multi-node, multi-system, multi-network environment • Existing C2IS/COTS applications can produce significant NEC capability • Procurement and integration procedures must be sufficiently agile to exploit technical opportunities and keep pace with operational requirements. • Cross Line of Development approach is essential – especially “Training and People”. Converts equipment into sustainable capability • The human dimension remains paramount

More Related