1 / 8

Concepts for Study

Concepts for Study. Or what are Petre , Bregman, and the CST really up to? Joel Bregman (Univ. of Michigan). Our Perspective. Are we poor and desperate or ….. …. rich and desperate? Near-term Rich (Existing) Chandra XMM Suzaku Swift. Agencies Continue to Spend Money On Us.

cameo
Télécharger la présentation

Concepts for Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Concepts for Study Or what are Petre, Bregman, and the CST really up to? Joel Bregman (Univ. of Michigan)

  2. Our Perspective • Are we poor and desperate or ….. • …. rich and desperate? • Near-term Rich (Existing) • Chandra • XMM • Suzaku • Swift

  3. Agencies Continue to Spend Money On Us • Being Constructed • eROSITA • GEMS • NuStar • Astro-H • Astrosat • Being Considered • Athena • Nicer • Loft

  4. So why are we so desperate? • General Purpose Telescope (Chandra; XMM) • We want to refresh the instrument package about once/decade • We don't get to do this in Chandra • We thought there was a good case for the next facility class mission to launch around 2020 (IXO) • two decades after Chandra & XMM • IXO cancelled

  5. What would be a good future? • Athena • Small-Medium Class NASA mission (0.3 - 1 B$) • Astro-K (you heard it here first) • What would be a bad future? • We and the national agencies agree that HEA science deserves to be an ongoing effort • (visit and thank your congressmen and senators) • Not useful ways of thinking: what we do is incremental; what’s the killer app?

  6. Funding Realities as I see it • the hungry 800 lb gorilla in the room: JWST • will eat funding for the next half-dozen years • can't build something "big" during that time (1 B$) • Congress + NASA probably not eager for another big facility class mission from Astrophysics • technology money should be available • might be able to get an explorer+ in the next 5 years • a 1 B$ class mission might happen at the end of the decade

  7. Winners and Losers • If we fulfill the terms of the charge, some people will feel left out in the cold • We are not picking specific missions, but.... • ...... we are selecting concepts (that's the charge) • And the technologies to support the concepts • Selection is under two near-term outcomes • Athena is chosen • Athena is not chosen • The CST agreed to not start selecting concepts until after this meeting • “Town Hall” CST meeting at AAS, 6:30 PM on Tuesday, January 10, 2012

  8. My Biases • We don't spend enough money on technology • I will not expand the charge (the charge seems sensible to me) • We need an ongoing presence for advising NASA in HEA. • In the super-secret category….. • The Macallan 18 year (preferred beverage of CST)

More Related