1 / 40

Mr. A. Square Unbound

Mr. A. Square Unbound. Continuum States in 1-D Quantum Mechanics. With Apologies to Shelley. In the previous section, we assumed That a particle exists in a 1-d space That it experiences a real potential, V(x) That its wavefunction is a solution of the TISE or TDSE

capucine
Télécharger la présentation

Mr. A. Square Unbound

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mr. A. Square Unbound Continuum States in 1-D Quantum Mechanics

  2. With Apologies to Shelley • In the previous section, we assumed • That a particle exists in a 1-d space • That it experiences a real potential, V(x) • That its wavefunction is a solution of the TISE or TDSE • That at infinity, its wavefunction is zero. • In this section, those are removed

  3. The consequences • If the boundary condition at infinity is removed, • Then a quantum system is not limited to a discrete set of states but • A continuum of energies is allowed.

  4. Normalizing Infinity • One problem if y(x)∞, how do you normalize it? • Well, Postulate 7 (wherein we discuss normalization) is based on the proviso that it mainly applies to bound states. • Mathematically, if we have to find a matrix element, we perform the following operation:

  5. The Free Particle

  6. Assume k>0 & real, and B(k)=0, then Y describes a wave moving from –x to +x • Obviously, <p2>=2k2 • So • Dp=<p2>-<p>2 =0 • There is no variance in momentum, thus the free particle has mixed momentum • This is in agreement with Newton’s 1st Law

  7. Assume k<0 & real, and A(k)=0, then Y describes a wave moving from +x to -x • Obviously, <p2>=2k2 • So • Dp=<p2>-<p>2 =0 • There is no variance in momentum, thus the free particle has mixed momentum • This is in agreement with Newton’s 1st Law

  8. Obviously • eikx represents a particle moving from right to left • e-ikx represents a particle moving from left to right

  9. The Wave Packet as a solution • Another solution to the TDSE is a “wave packet” • As an example, let B(k)=0 and the solution is in the form of the integral: • Note that this is the inverse Fourier transform • A complication arises in that w is not really independent of k

  10. The Wave Packet cont’d • Typically, the form of A(k) is chosen to be a Gaussian • We also assume that w(k) can be expanded in a Taylor series about a specific value of k

  11. The Wave Packet cont’d • The packet consists of “ripples” contained within an “envelope” • “the phase velocity” is the velocity of the ripples • “the group velocity” is the velocity of the envelope • In the earlier expansion, the group velocity is dw/dk

  12. The phase velocity • So the ripple travels at ½ the speed of the particle • Also, note if <p2>=2k2 then I can find a “quantum velocity”= <p2> /m2 • 2k2/m2= E/2m=vq • So vq is the phase velocity or the quantum mechanical wave function travels at the phase speed

  13. The Group Velocity • The group velocity (the velocity of the envelope) is velocity of the particle and is twice the ripple velocity. • BTW the formula for w in terms of k is called the dispersion relation

  14. V(x)=V0 Region 2 Region 1 x=0 The Step Potential

  15. Region 1 • “A” is the amplitude of the incident wave • “B” is the amplitude of the reflected wave

  16. Region 2 • “C” is the amplitude of the transmitted wave

  17. Matching Boundary Conditions • The problem is that we have 2 equations and 3 unknowns. • “A” is controlled by the experimenter so we will always solve ALL equations in terms of the amplitude of the incident wave

  18. Applying some algebra • If E>V0 then E-V0>0 or “+” • Then k2 is real and y2 is an oscillator propagation • If E<V0 • Classically, the particle is repelled • In QM, k2 is imaginary and y2 describes an attenuating wave

  19. V(x)=V0 V(x)=V0 Region 2 Region 2 Region 1 Region 1 x=0 x=0 Graphically • If E>V0 then E-V0>0 or “+” • Then k2 is real and y2 is an oscillator propagation • If E<V0 • Classically, the particle is repelled • In QM, k2 is imaginary and y2 describes an attenuating wave

  20. Reflection and Transmission Coefficients • If k2 is imaginary, T=0 • If k2 is real, then

  21. In terms of Energy, • If E<V0 then R=1 and T=0 • If E>V0 then

  22. The Step Potential V(x)=V0 Region 2 Region 1 Region 3 x=0 x=a

  23. The Wave Function

  24. Boundary Conditions

  25. Apply Boundary Conditions

  26. Solving

  27. Reflection and Transmission Coefficients

  28. Some Consequences • When ka=n*p, n=integer, implies T=1 and R=0 • This happens because there are 2 edges where reflection occur and these components can add destructively • Called “Ramsauer-Townsend” effect

  29. For E<V0 • Classically, the particle must always be reflected • QM says that there is a nonvanishing T • In region 2, k is imaginary • Since cos(iz)=cosh(z) • sin(iz)=isinh(z) • Since cosh2z-sinh2z=1 • T cannot be unity so there is no Ramsauer-Townsend effect

  30. What happens if the barrier height is high and the length is long? • Consequence: T is very small; barrier is nearly opaque. • What if V0<0? Then the problem reduces to the finite box • Poles (or infinities) in T correspond to discrete states

  31. An Alternate Method We could have skipped over the Mr. A Square Bound and gone straight to Mr. A Square Unbound. We would identify poles in the scattering amplitude as bound states. This approach is difficult to carry out in practice

  32. The Dirac Delta Potential • The delta barrier can either be treated as a bound state problem or considered as a scattering problem. • The potential is given by V(x)=-ad(x-x0) x=x0 Region 1 Region 2

  33. Wavefunctions and Boundary Conditions

  34. From the previous lecture, the discontinuity at the singularity is given by:

  35. Applying the boundary conditions • R cannot vanish or only vanishes if k is very large so there is always some reflection

  36. Solving for k and E • This is in agreement with the result of the previous section. • If a is negative, then the spike is repulsive and there are no bound states

  37. V(x) A Matrix Approach to Scattering Consider a general, localized scattering problem Region 1 Region 3 Region 2

  38. Wavefunctions

  39. Boundary Conditions • There are four boundary conditions in this problem and we can use them to solve for “B” and “F” in terms of “A” and “G”. • B=S11A+S12G F=S21A+S22G • Sij are the various coefficients which depend on k. They seem to form a 2 x 2 matrix • Called the scattering matrix (s-matrix for short)

  40. Consequences • The case of scattering from the left, G=0 so RL=|S11|2 and TL=|S21|2 • The case of scattering from the right, F=0 so RR=|S22|2 and TR=|S12|2 • The S-matrix tells you everything that you need to know about scattering from a localized potential. • It also contains information about the bound states • If you have the S-matrix and you want to locate bound states, let kik and look for the energies where the S-matrix blows up.

More Related