120 likes | 133 Vues
Explore a regional approach to collaboration between prisons, probation, and policy to deliver effective offender management. Learn about archaeology, architecture, archetypes, and arcology and their role in this collaborative effort.
E N D
Offender ManagementNOMS Conference 2010 - a regional approach to collaboration between prisons, probation and policy to deliver successful offender management Gill Mortlock, DOM West Midlands Paul Hindson, Policy Lead Offender Management Tony Brewerton, Regional Project Manager West of Midlands
Structure of the session • Archaeology – a look at history & some remains • Architecture – a look at organisation and structure • Archetypes – a look at signs and symbols • Arcology – a look at ideal structures
Policy Policy Policy Offender Management and Offender Engagement COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION Practice Commissioning COMMUNICATION
Allocate a manager Simplify processes Minimise hand-offs Prepare the right plans and, if they don’t deliver the right results, write better ones Continuity of person not just the plan Build quality checks into the process, not after One plan to rule them all One person to lead them One place to record them all And to the offender bind them Some principles of offender management
Links to national policy groups Offender Management Steering Group Joint OASys Business Group Layered Offender Management Steering Group Regional Implementation Group PrOMPT (Probation OM Leads)
Sent. Calc. HDC Recall UKBA ROTL OMU “Central Hub” Information Discharge ECL ReCat Parole Initial SP Parole Lifers SP Review Public Protection LAYERED OFFENDER MANAGEMENT The Custodial Journey Reception Interventions CSRA Building a platform ACCT Residential Induction
Some products - quality • Monitor Offender Manager engagement in sentence planning • ‘OM in a Box’ • QED toolkit for OM Quality Improvement programme • OASys Quality Assurance • Parole Report Quality Assurance
Some products - offender engagement • Phone & Video Conferencing • Offender DVD • Custody and community compacts • Offender interviews as part of OM quality improvement • Feedback questionnaires • Workbooks
This collaborative approach has helped to turn these sort of risks into opportunities: • OM Model not rolled out uniformly – by contributing to development piloting and preparations for Layered OM • Offender management is under specified – by contributing to the specification of ‘Manage Sentence in Custody’ • Prison and probation retreat into managing offenders under separate systems – by bringing prison & probation together to undertake quality audits of offender assessment & management • Pass the parcel not end-to-end approach to offender management – by capturing the end to end process in an at-a-glance format and then testing it • Offender management becomes just another intervention rather than a continuous thread – from just about every SFO case we know that discontinuity is often at the heart of the issue. OM provides the means to deliver public protection end-to-end and is not an end in itself