1 / 28

Project Overview and Status June 17, 2014

Project Overview and Status June 17, 2014. Loreen Bobo, P.E. I-4 Ultimate Construction Program Manager. Improvements. Length: 21 miles from west of Kirkman Road to East of SR 434 Orange and Seminole Counties Cost: $ 2.323 billion (yoe) in design/construction costs

carlos-delaney
Télécharger la présentation

Project Overview and Status June 17, 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project Overview and StatusJune 17, 2014 Loreen Bobo, P.E. I-4 Ultimate Construction Program Manager

  2. Improvements • Length: 21 miles from west of KirkmanRoad to East of SR 434 • Orange and Seminole Counties • Cost: $2.323 billion (yoe) in design/construction costs • What: Reconstruction of mainline and interchanges • What: Addition of 4(four) Express Lanes (4Express) • Design/Construction Duration:~ 6.5 years

  3. Improvements • Reconstruction of 15 interchanges • 3 system-to-system interchanges • Over 60 new bridges • Over 70 bridge replacements • 2 new pedestrian crossings at • Maitland Blvd. and SR 436 • Increase design speed to 60 mph • P3 – public-private partnership • Design-build-finance-operate-maintain • I-4 Mobility Partners chosen 4/23/14

  4. Interstate Typical Section 6 general use lanes + auxiliary lanes 4 Express Lanes (2 in each direction)

  5. Interstate Typical Section General Use Lanes Express Lanes • Emergency access gates will be provided between the Express Lanes and general use lanes at a minimum of every 2 miles.

  6. Planned Access to Express Lanes • FDOT will set the toll rates and collect the tolls. • Access to and from the tolled express lanes will be limited • Barrier wall separated • Slip ramp access • Direct ramp access • Six to seven access points in each direction • Variable tolling • All Electronic Tolling • Everyone pays • No heavy trucks

  7. I-4 Ultimate Aesthetics • Enhanced treatments levels • Decorative columns • Special lighting • Color coordinated • Landscaping

  8. Noise Barriers

  9. Corridor Options SunRail

  10. Public Private PartnershipsValue Proposition • P3 Seeks to Achieve 5 Primary Goals • Provide capacity improvements much sooner than possible under traditional pay-as-you go approach – 20 years sooner! • Eliminate project phasing and advance the overall project • Capitalize on the private sector’s innovation and access to capital markets • Transfer of appropriate risk items to private partner • Enhance long-term, lifecycle cost efficiency and service quality

  11. Availability PaymentsType of P3 • The “owner,” meaning the government entity, “pays” to the extent the facility is open to traffic and meets contractual performance specifications for operations and maintenance. • Typically used for projects with established traffic. • May be used for toll deals where goal is to maximize use or reduce congestion, rather than to maximize revenue. • Example: 595 Express, Port of Miami Tunnel, • Florida’s Turnpike Service Plazas

  12. Estimated Costs • Not actuals from Best Value Proposer • Capital Cost (Design and Construction): $2.4 billion (Year of Expenditure – YOE) • $54 million toward local roads • Operations and Maintenance: $378 million over contract • Renewal and Replacement: $493 million over contract • Other (SPV, Insurance, Interest, Finance): Varies

  13. Financial Details

  14. Timeline • March 4, 2013 Industry Forum • March 5-6, 2013 One on One’s with interested teams (8) • March 8, 2013 Request for Qualifications • June 5, 2013 Short-listed 4 teams (out of 7), RFP released • February 12, 2014 Technical Proposals due (4 received) • March 13, 2014 Financial Proposals due (4 received) • April 23, 2014 Best Value Selection – I-4 Mobility Partners • Late Summer 2014 Financial close, contract signed • After Financial Close Start design (NTP 1) • 4+ months later Construction;operations & maintenance (NTP 2) • 2020/2021 Construction completed • Full O&M starts, replacement & renewals • 2054 Contract ends

  15. Request for Proposals • Instructions to Proposers (ITP): Procurement Document • Volume I: Concession Agreement (CA) • 435 pages, including 26 appendices • Volume II: Technical Requirements • 495 pages • Section 1: Project Description • Section 2: Project Requirements and Provisions for Work • Section 3: Design and Construction Requirements • Attachment 1 – ITS Deployment Requirements • Attachment 2 – Tolls Infrastructure Requirements • Attachment 3 – QAM and QAF Requirements • Attachment 4 – QA/QC Requirement • Section 4: Operations & Maintenance Requirements • Section 5: Handback Requirements • Volume III: Additional Mandatory Standards

  16. Alternative Technical Concepts (ATC’s)From ITP • Alternative Technical Concepts (ATC’s) • Confidential • RFP was not changed if an ATC was allowed • 5 meetings with each team, in person • Quick turn around needed • Team of 25 + people from different disciplines participated in the process. • Base Line and Grade – Any deviation of more than 5 feet had to be submitted • Alternative Financial Concepts (AFC’s) • Not confidential • Teleconferences with each team • One on One meetings • Four Meetings with each team • Contract Issues rather than technical

  17. Alternative Technical Concepts (ATC’s)From ITP • Set forth the process for FDOT’s review and acceptance of technical concepts that conflict with the requirements of the Contract Documents • This process is intended to allow Proposers to incorporatetechnical innovation and creativity into their Proposals • To be eligible for consideration, proposed ATCs must result in performance, quality and utility of the end product that is equal to or better than the performance, quality and utility of the end product that would result from full compliance with the Contract Documents

  18. Alternative Technical Concepts (ATC’s)From ITP • A proposed ATC may not be approved if, in FDOT’s sole discretion, it is premised upon or would require (a) a reduction in quantities without achieving equal or better performance, quality and utility; (b) a reduction in performance, quality, utility or reliability; (c) major changes to the existing Environmental Approvals, including changes that would trigger the need for a supplemental Environmental Impact Statement under NEPA; (d) a Change in Law; or (e) multiple or material additional right of way parcels.

  19. Possible ATC Responses (A) The proposed ATC is acceptable for inclusion in the Proposal (with such conditions, modifications or requirements as identified by FDOT). Approval dates are noted below. Conditional Approval requirements are provided in Attachment 1. (B) The proposed ATC is not acceptable for inclusion in the Proposal. (C) The proposed ATC is not acceptable in its present form, but may be acceptable upon the satisfaction, in FDOT’s sole discretion, of certain identified conditions which must be met or clarifications or modifications that must be made prior to resubmittal (FDOT will not utilize this response after the final submission date for ATCs). (D) The proposed ATC appears to comply with the Contract Documents and does not require an ATC as to the specific provision of the Contract Documents identified by the Proposer in its proposed ATC (provided, however, that should it turn out that the concept as incorporated into the Proposal is not within the requirements of the Contract Documents, FDOT reserves the right to require compliance with the requirements of the Contract Documents, in which event the Proposer will not be entitled to modify its Proposal or receive additional compensation or a time extension under the Agreement). (E) Although the submittal does not require an ATC because it appears to comply with the Contract Documents, it may not be included in the Proposer’s Proposal and FDOT will modify the Contract Documents to preclude the concept.

  20. ATC Stats

  21. ATC Stats

  22. I-4 ULTIMATEProposal Scores • Technical Proposal Criteria [Up to 60 points] • Technical Proposal Qualitative Assessment - 35 points • Preliminary Corridor Master Plan Submittal Evaluation Criteria • Operation and Maintenance Evaluation Criteria • Baseline Construction Period - 5 points • Inclusion of Direct Connection Proposal - 5 points • Project Technical Enhancements - 15 points • Financial Proposal Criteria [Up to 40 points] • Financial Price - 35 points • Feasibility of Financial Proposal - 5 points

  23. EEO, DBE, SB & OJT • Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Goal • 9% for Construction • 9% for Design • 9% for Operations and Maintenance • Small Business (SB) Goal (non DBE) • 3% for Construction • 3% for Design • 3% for Operations & Maintenance • On-the-Job Training (OJT) Goal • 250 trainees

  24. 595 Express - Ft. Lauderdale • 595 Express: P3, $1.2 billion design and construction, began construction in 2008, opened to traffic in March 2014. • DBE goal was 8.6% (FY actuals) • 08/09 - 9.0% • 09/10 - 9.2% • 10/11 - 8.7% • 11/12 - 10.6% • 12/13 – 17.0% • 13/14—33.3% (CURRENTLY PROJECTED) • 4 females working in construction crafts (last year’s report) • On-the-Job Training (OJT) goal • 118 trainees (goal) 164 graduated! • Employed on the job • 1,728 (average) 2,160 (at peak)

  25. Public InformationCommunity Outreach • Project website • Public information • Lane/ramp closures • Developing a mobile app • Project videos • Loreen Bobo, P.E. FDOT Project Contact Construction Program Manager loreen.bobo@dot.state.fl.us 386-943-5541

  26. Project Video

  27. Project Video

  28. Thank You Loreen Bobo, P.E. FDOT Project Contact Construction Program Manager loreen.bobo@dot.state.fl.us 386-943-5541

More Related