1 / 13

2012/01/30

Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 3-5: Evolution of dynamical structure of galaxies Seminar: Forster Schreiber et al. 2009, ApJ, 706, 1364 Lecture:. 2012/01/30. 0<z<1: Morphology of z~1 star-forming galaxies (Luminous IR Galaxies). Rest-B. 5 arcsec. Konishi et al. 2011, PASJ, 63, 363.

carrington
Télécharger la présentation

2012/01/30

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Galactic Astronomy銀河物理学特論 ILecture 3-5: Evolution of dynamical structure of galaxiesSeminar: Forster Schreiber et al. 2009, ApJ, 706, 1364 Lecture: 2012/01/30

  2. 0<z<1: Morphology of z~1 star-forming galaxies (Luminous IR Galaxies) Rest-B 5 arcsec Konishi et al. 2011, PASJ, 63, 363

  3. ●　LIRG disk▲LIRG bulge ○　non-LIRG disk△non-LIRG bulge ●X-ray 0<z<1: Morphology of z~1 star-forming galaxies (Luminous IR Galaxies) • SFR fraction （●:▲:○:△）　0.64:0.14:0.19:0.03 • For galaxies with SFR > ~ 19 Msun yr-1 (24 mm limit), 70% are LIRGs . • No active star formation among non-LIRG bulge dominated galaxies 24 mm completeness limit Sbc-Sd S0/a-Sb E/S0 SDSSemlines LIRGs dominate star formation rate density z ~ 1. Ms ≥ 1010 Msun LIRGs have morphologies similar to disk galaxies Konishi et al. 2011, PASJ, 63, 363

  4. Between 0<z<1 : Disk galaxies : Disk-size • 0<z<1: Size evolution of disk galaxies • The absolute magnitude – size relation (i.e. surface brightness) shows evolution but no evolution in the stellar mass – size relation (i.e. surface stellar mass density) (Barden et al. 2005, ApJ, 635, 959)

  5. Between 0<z<1 : Disk galaxies : Disk dynamics • 0<z<1: Evolution of the Tully-Fisher relation • Disk galaxy dynamics with VLT/GIRRAFFE multi-IFU w/o AO • Flores et al. 2006, A&A, 455, 107 (0.4<z<0.75, disk galaxies), 35% pure-rotating disks following local-TF relation, 65% disturbed rotation, complex kinematics ? • IMAGES: Yang et al. (2008, A&A, 477, 789), Neichel et al. (2008, A&A, 484, 159), Puech et al. (2008, A&A, 484, 173) • Neichel+08 : 12/22 spiral morphology galaxies have PR or CK velocity fields • Peuch+08 : 2 times increase of stellar mass necessary to match the local K-band TF relation ？ Velocity dispersion ratio between model and observation at the model peak position Yang+08; RD (blue), PR (green), CK (red) Puech+08; Solid line: local TF relation Distance between model and observed peaks of velocity dispersion (pixel=0.52”)

  6. 0<z<1 : Disk galaxies : Bar-fraction • Sheth et al. (2008, ApJ, 675, 1141)COSMOS HST images sample • Fraction of barrd spiral galaxies (bar-fraction) shows rapid increase between z=1 and 0. • The increase is more rapid for galaxies with smaller stellar mass. Black: z=0.14-0.37 Blue: z=0.37-0.60 Red: z=0.60-0.84

  7. 0<z<1 : Early-type (E+S0) galaxies • Treu et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 175, 0.2<z<1.2 field E+S0 (GOODS-N) • Offset from local FP (sigma-SB-Re) is d(logM/L)/dz=-0.4 for logM* >11.5 and 0.5>d(logM/L)/dz>-1 for logM*<11. Such offsets are consistent with passive evolution with zf=5 and zf=1-2, respectively. • E+S0 galaxies in clusters of galaxies show offset of d(logM/L)/dz=-0.46, larger evolution than field samples. • van der Wel & van der Marel (2008, ApJ, 684, 260) 0.6<z<1.2 field E+S0 • (V/sigma)* vs. MB relation and (V/sigma)* vs. Ellipticity relation can be explained with passive evolution models. • Fainter elliptical galaxies show larger fraction of galaxies with large (V/sigma)* and large ellipticity. • van der Wel et al. (2008, ApJ, 688, 48) 0.8<z<1.2 field+cluster E+S0 • Evolution of the Re vs. Mdyn relation. Re is about half at the same Mdyn.

  8. Between 0<z<1 : Disk galaxies : Disk dynamics IFU (+AO) spectroscopic observations of high-redshift galaxies： image slicer VLT SINFONI

  9. Z~3 ; structure • Most of the LBGs (+an RadioG +DRGs) are fitted well with Sersic profiles with n<2. (Akiyama et al. 2008, ApJS, 175, 1)

  10. Z~3: Dynamics • Stark et al. 2008 Nature, 455, 755; z=3.07 lensed galaxy • Thanks to gravitational lensing and LGSAO, effective spatial resolution was very high (20-40mas = 150-300pc resolution) . Smooth velocity shear field support the rotational structure of the galaxy. • +-50km/s rotation (inner 0.5kpc) + flat rotation curve, logMdyn=9.3 vs. logMstr=9.8 • Sigma=54km/s, v/sigma=1.2 (heating by star-formation activity ?), • 4.4 Msolar/yr/kpc2 (Similar to nuclear Star burst in local galaxies) • 12+log(O/H)=8.6 = 0.9Zsolar, • CO luminosity-gas mass conversion factor <0.8; ~local LIRG (1) << local spiral (5)

  11. Z~3: Dynamics • Law et al. (2009, ApJ, 697, 2057) • 12 galaxies at z=2.0-2.5 and 1 galaxy at z=3.3 ([OIII]) observed with Keck LGS-AO (typical resolution 0.15”) + OSIRIS with 1.0-4.5hours with 100/150mas FWHM (50mas sampling). Mean velocity (black) vs. velocity dispersion (red)

  12. Z~3: Dynamics • Law et al. (2009, ApJ, 697, 2057) V(shear) as a function of stellar mass. Horizontal dashed line represents the typical velocity dispersion (70km/s). V(shear) as a function of gas mass fraction (Mgas/(Mgas+Mstar), Mgas estimated with Ha luminosity)

  13. Z~3 : Summary I • Rotation supported or velocity dispersion supported ? • Large stellar mass galaxies are rotation dominated ? • Large velocity dispersion imply large Jean’s mass resulting big star-forming complexes (Elmegreen et al 2008, next slide). • Thick disk ? : hz/R = 0.5(sigma/v)^2 • Toomre’s Q parameter is small : globally-unstable disks. • Q= sigma k / 3.36 G Sigma • MW: sigma=30km/s, Sigma=50Msolar/pc^2, k=36km/s/kpc -> Q=1.4 • High-z: sigma=50-100km/s, Sigma=300Msolar/pc^2, k=V/R=30km/s/kpc resulting Q=0.2

More Related