1 / 27

Integrative taxonomy

Integrative taxonomy. Gustav Paulay Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida. Integrative taxonomy. Use of multiple lines of evidence Field - museum - lab Ecology - behavior - morphology - genetics - geography Distinguishing between morphs and species

carson
Télécharger la présentation

Integrative taxonomy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Integrative taxonomy Gustav Paulay Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida

  2. Integrative taxonomy • Use of multiple lines of evidence • Field - museum - lab • Ecology - behavior - morphology - genetics - geography • Distinguishing between morphs and species • Two or more independent characters showing distinction between species

  3. Integrative taxonomy:Actinopyga mauritiana - guamensis

  4. Integrative taxonomy:Actinopyga mauritiana - guamensis

  5. Not seeing species where there are • cukes vs. primates • different foci for sensory perception • unequal rates of evolution • phenotype: morphology, behavior, color pattern... • genotype: sequence divergence • reproductive isolation

  6. Supposed distribution of Scutellastra flexuosa and exusta Powell, 1968

  7. but what is really going on... NJ K2P COI

  8. Seeing species where there aren’t • ecophenotypic variation • ontogenetic variation • geographic variation • ecological variation - depth, habitat, etc • polymorphism • paralogous loci • former divergence now united

  9. Paralogous loci:mitochondrial genes gone nuclear in Alpheus Williams & Knowlton 2001 Mol Biol Evol

  10. Cypraea tigris a species differentiated, then united

  11. ESU - reciprocal monophyly • DNA - gene flow - BSC • reciprocal monophyly implies lack of recent genetic connections • need several samples of each form to test • reliability of conclusion depends on depth of intra- vs. inter-specific variation • in sympatry - separate biological species • in allopatry - separate ESUs, species status subjective

  12. Cypraea punctata complex Basinal/subbasinal speciation common • perceived as other dominant mode of speciation by past studies • predominant mode in Cypraeidae, Aspidochirotida, Diogenidae, Parribacus

  13. Where are the species limits?

  14. Lack of reciprocal monophyly • morphs rather than species • distinct species, but: • introgression • insufficient time for sorting • deep coalescent • rapid speciation

  15. Introgression in Astralium

  16. Introgression in Bohadschia argus? • Unusual form only in W Pacific; never seen in Polynesia, etc. • Need compare independent markers to test

  17. Insufficient time for sortingGene trees vs. species trees:coalescence theory Avise 1999 Phylogeography

  18. Evolution of reproductive isolation • Slow • most gastropod • deep divergence among allopatric ESUs • clear reciprocal monophyly • slow to secondary sympatry / biological species • Rapid • echinoids, holothuroids • shallow divergence among sympatric species • potential paraphyletic species • rapid to secondary sympatry / biological species

  19. Astralium rhodostomum complex • Two deeply divergent clades: A & B sympatric on 8 island groups • 30 ESUs so far • Pigmentation separates major and minor clades.

  20. Persistence of allopatry - Cypraeidae 94% divergences < 10 Ma retain allopatry (115 of 122) 94% divergences < 10 Ma retain signal (115 of 122) Geographic signal no signal

  21. Echinometra mathaei complex Rapid secondary sympatryFacilitated by rapid evolution of fertilization proteins? ~1 Ma COI Bindin Bindin COI Landry et al. 2003 Proc Roy Soc

  22. Cukes like urchins: Actinopyga obesa complex

  23. Stichopus variegatus complex

  24. Advantages of sequence data • Directly test genetic connections • Very large number of characters • Independent markers - independent sources • “Independent” of morphology - so can trace evolution of form, etc on gene tree without circularity

  25. Potential problems with sequence data • depth of coalescent vs. interspecific divergence • paralogous sequences • introgression • selective sweeps • homogenization through drift

More Related