1 / 21

Radiation Belt Electron Transport & Energization

Radiation Belt Electron Transport & Energization. Slot region. outer belt. inner belt. Mary K. Hudson, Magnetospheric Thrust Participants. Coupled Modeling Scheme. Solar Cycle of SAMPEX 2-6 MeV Electrons. Li et al., GRL, 2006. Response to Solar Wind Forcing.

Télécharger la présentation

Radiation Belt Electron Transport & Energization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Radiation Belt Electron Transport & Energization Slot region outer belt inner belt Mary K. Hudson, Magnetospheric Thrust Participants

  2. Coupled Modeling Scheme

  3. Solar Cycle of SAMPEX 2-6 MeV Electrons Li et al., GRL, 2006

  4. Response to Solar Wind Forcing • 2-3 day lag at Geo Paulikas & Blake, 1979 • Prompt peak L ~3 Vassiliadis et al., 2003 SAMPEX/Vsw correlation 2-6 MeV fluxes

  5. ULF Wave-Relativistic Electron Correlation Rostoker et al., GRL, 1998

  6. Direct Coupling of Solar Wind ULF Waves Kepko & Spence, JGR, 2003 Or Convective Growth Magnetopause K-H Waves Miura, JGR, 1992; Claudepierre et al., JGR, 2008 LFM time series analysis

  7. Halloween ’03 2-6 and >10 MeV Electrons See filling of slot region on storm timescale (days) at 2-6 MeV (Baker et al., 2004) SAMPEX observes > 2 month delay in high > 10 MeV fluxes at low altitude (longer loss time)

  8. Halloween ’03 Shock Injection LFM-test particle simulation • W ~ 5 MeV  15 MeV • R ~ 6 RE  2.5 RE E = - B/t : Bz/t E Kress et al., JGR, 07

  9. Halloween ’03 Shock Injection of >10 MeV (W0=1-7 MeV) Electrons Kress et al., 2006

  10. Low altitude SAMPEX observations at > 10 MeV electrons, injected 10/29/03 Looper et al., ‘06 Simulated pitch angle distribution-> Kress et al., 2006

  11. MHD Fields Inject RadBelt Electrons Plasmasheet el injection  Elkington et al., JASTP, 2004

  12. MHD Fields Injection of RadBelt Electrons Elkington et al., JASTP, 2004

  13. PSD calculations for other storms… September 1998 (final) January 1995 • The (big) September 1998 storm shows a significant change in trapped PSD as a result of coupling to the plasmasheet. • The more moderate storm of January 1995 showed almost no coupling with the plasmasheet. Elkington et al., 2008

  14. Diffusion Rates vs. L Radial diffusion rates in model ULF wave fields D_LL ~ LN Perry et al., JGR, 05, includes δEφ, δBr, δB//, freq and L-dependent power • Radial diffusion rates in • model ULF wave fields • DLL ~ D0LN # # ULF wave DLL studies: Elkington et al., 2003; Ukhorskiy et al., 2005; Fei et al., 2006 Tau(L,E) Summers 04; Tau = days/Kp Shprits 05 Braughtigam & Albert, 2000, N = 10; Perry et al., 2006

  15. F. Chu et al., AGU, F 07 • = 1000 MeV/G ↑ Radial Diffusion for Nov 04 Storm Baker et al., GRL, 07

  16. July & Nov 04 Differ by SSC

  17. Plasmapause Control of Electron Flux Peak and Slot Region Local accel and pitchangle scattering due to VLF/ELF waves (Whistler, EMIC) Shprits et al., JASTP 2008

  18. Magnetospheric SEP Simulations SEP Cutoffs: Brian Kress poster

  19. SEP Cutoff rigidities calculated in a CISM CMIT simulation of 14 May 1997 storm IGRF field embedded within MHD inner boundary

  20. Handoff to Forecast Transition • Radial diffusion model with DLLdetermined by LTR ULF wave power tabulated by vsw or Kp switch • SEP cutoffs in solar-wind parametrized MHD field snapshots • Neither involve pushing millions of particles in time-dependent MHD fields in real time using appropriate input spectra; • Given input spectra, e.g. SEPs from COHREL+parametrized shock model SEP cutoffs • Given continuously available geo fluxes radbelt f at peak flux, typically L~3-4 at 2-6 MeV, determined from radial diffusion code including time-dependent plasmapause loss term

More Related