1 / 31

Designing for Web Accessibility: Guidelines and Regulations

Designing for Web Accessibility: Guidelines and Regulations. Jonathan Lazar Towson University. What is Web Accessibility?. People with various impairments/disabilities use different types of assistive technologies Screen readers (speech output) Braille displays (tactile output)

cate
Télécharger la présentation

Designing for Web Accessibility: Guidelines and Regulations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Designing for Web Accessibility:Guidelines and Regulations Jonathan Lazar Towson University

  2. What is Web Accessibility? People with various impairments/disabilities use different types of assistive technologies Screen readers (speech output) Braille displays (tactile output) Alternate keyboards or pointing devices (input) Speech recognition (input) and others

  3. What is Web Accessibility? • Web sites need to be flexible enough to work with all of the various input/output/assistive technology devices • When a web site is flexible to work with these devices, it’s called “accessible” • There is still an academic argument: • Technical access is different from ease of use, but we need to work on technical access, before ease of use 3

  4. Accessibility Guidelines • It’s not enough to say, “make it accessible” that’s why you need to have specific guidelines to instruct people on how to do it • Guidelines are a traditional technique from HCI and usability • There are many sources of guidelines: • Web accessibility research community • Non-governmental organizations • Governmental agencies • Consulting firms 4

  5. Accessibility Guidelines • Usually, these guidelines and communities are all intertwined. • For instance, members of the accessibility community used their research in the late 1990s • To help develop the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 1.0 in 1999 (sponsored by an NGO) • The WCAG 1.0 were used and modified in creating Section 508, the US Federal guidelines, implemented in 2001 • Section 508 guidelines were used for implementation for Maryland State government agencies, with rules implemented in 2005 5

  6. Accessibility Guidelines • In reality, these guidelines only address perceptual and motor impairments • People with perceptual and motor impairments want to access the same information, same web sites, same applications as other users, just using different I/O devices • In reality, people with cognitive impairments often want to accomplish different task goals 6

  7. Accessibility Guidelines • It’s not enough to say, “make it accessible” that’s why you need to have specific guidelines to instruct people • There are two main sets of Accessibility Guidelines: • Section 508 • Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) • Both of these are undergoing revisions at this point in time 7

  8. WCAG 1.0 • The web content accessibility guidelines were created by the WWW Consortium • http://www.w3.org/wai • WCAG 1.0 was approved in 1999 • Split into a number of levels: • Priority Level 1 (must do) • Priority Level 2 (should do) • Priority Level 3 (may do) • Level 1 are the important ones 8

  9. WCAG 1.0 • Since 1999, these have been the international “standards,” but they have no legal standing • Many countries (including the US) based their legal standards on WCAG 1.0 (priority level 1) • Also comes in different sizes: small, medium, and large • WCAG is for content. WAI also has agent and authoring tool guidelines • In reality, even though the official standard is now WCAG 2.0, WCAG 1.0 has more power since laws are based on it 9

  10. WCAG 2.0 • WCAG 2.0 was approved in December 2008 • Differences: • Applies to newer web technologies • More precisely testable (some guidelines in WCAG 1.0 were very vague) • Gives examples of where alt text isn’t necessary (e.g. for pure decoration) • Techniques document that gives actual coding examples • Doesn’t immediately prohibit as much…more gray areas exist 10

  11. WCAG 2.0 • 1.0: set of guidelines that have checkpoints • 2.0: 4 design principles, with relating guidelines • Comparison document: • http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-20060427/appendixD.html • WCAG 2.0, over time, will become important. But it’s not there yet. 11

  12. What is Section 508? • Section 508, the new portions of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, were implemented as law (signed in 1998), with rules effective in 2001 • This requires that the federal government only purchase or develop or otherwise fund accessible technology • This applies to ALL technology, but in this presentation, we focus on the web • All federal or federally-funded web sites must be accessible! • This was a big change (this is when companies really starting paying attention to interface accessibility) 12

  13. Section 508 • Section 508 only applies to the Federal government or federally funded projects, not private industry • Standards are defined by the US Access Board (http://www.access-board.gov/) • Since a large portion of the IT industry involves government contracts, those private companies must develop accessible, 508-compliant solutions to sell to the Federal government. • What about the Americans with Disabilities Act? More later on that… 13

  14. Section 508 • Large set of standards • Software applications and operating systems (1194.21) • Web-based intranet and internet information and systems (1194.22) • Telecommunication products • Video and multimedia products • Self contained, closed products • Desktop and portable computers • 1194.21 and 1194.22 are most relevant to our interface design work 14

  15. Section 508 • Section 508 standards for the web (1194.22) are strongly based on WCAG 1.0 Priority Level 1 (the law even states this and has a translation table) • Most states have laws in place, based on Section 508, that cover the accessibility of state government computing systems 15

  16. The 508 guidelines are under review Informally known as the “508 refresh” Telecommunications and Electronic and Information Technology Advisory Committee (TEITAC) presented recommendations to the Access Board on April 3, 2008 http://www.teitac.org It’s now in the hands of the US Access Board http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/update-index.htm New version of Section 508 16

  17. While the report delivered by TEITAC in 2008 is by no means final or adopted, there are some important recommendations: New version of 508 should be based on WCAG 2.0 Guidelines will still be focused primarily on perceptual and motor impairment (cognitive impairment was tabled due to limited existing research, and being hard to test for or measure) The guidelines recognize that web-based, desktop, and hand-held applications have essentially merged New version of Section 508 17

  18. You need to keep checking the web sites for updates on the “508 refresh” http://www.teitac.org http://www.access-board.gov/ Note that there is no clear timeline for when the new 508 guidelines will be approved, but: The suggested, but not approved, guidelines are already up on the web It’s based on WCAG 2.0, which is already approved Based on past experience, it is expected to be in 2010 or 2011 New version of Section 508 18

  19. State Laws • Many states (e.g. California and Maryland) have laws that requires that state-developed, supported, or funded technology be accessible for people with disabilities • Often, these laws directly reference Section 508 or WCAG 1.0 • You can often find state-level laws for accessibility by checking the web site of the state chapter of the National Federation of the Blind 19

  20. One Example: Maryland Laws • Maryland has a law in place since 2000 (when it was signed) and 2005 (when the rules were implemented) • The law is known as Non-visual Access to Information Technology • http://doit.maryland.gov/policies/Pages/nva.aspx • This law requires that all IT developed or procured by Maryland state government be accessible to people with disabilities. • This law uses a modified version of Section 508, with additional descriptions 20

  21. Does 508 apply to private industry? • A very basic summary of the challenge: • Section 508 covers all technology but not private industry…these are federal regulations • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) from 1990 clearly applies to private companies (with 15 or more employees), but does not clearly cover web sites (www.ada.gov) • This is where the policymaking/confusion exists! 21

  22. ADA and Web Accessibility • ADA was signed into law in 1990, before the web was known, so no sections covered the web • There have been multiple attempts, using different approaches, and different locations, to get the ADA to clearly cover private web sites • It’s still unclear, and there’s a long history! 22

  23. Some of the history • In 1996, Justice Department (DOJ) issued a policy statement saying that ADA does apply to the Internet • In 2000, DOJ filed an amicus curiae brief in Hooks v. OKBridge (saying the same) • In 2003, DOJ issued a policy statement with guidelines for state and local government web sites • In 2004, NY Attorney General Elliot Spitzer declared that ADA applies to the Internet in NY state, and forced Priceline.com and Ramada to comply • NONE of these have any real policy influence or importance!!! 23

  24. National Federation of the Blind (NFB) vs. AOL, filed in 1999, settled out of court 2001 Martin v. Metropolitan Atlanta Transportation Authority (2002)- ADA was violated by not having an accessible web site Southwest vs. Access Now/Gumson (2002). Southwest won, ADA doesn’t apply to web sites, was not a place of public accommodation Target vs. NFB, filed in 2006 Preliminary ruling in 2006: ADA does apply Class was certified, CA subclass in 2007 Settled out of court in 2008, more than $6 million ADA-related cases 24

  25. Judge Patel (NFB v Target) stated in 2006: The ADA "statute applies to the services of a place of public accommodation, not services in a place of public accommodation.” But it was settled out of court, without a final ruling What about places that are strictly online? Right now, this is the legal case that most businesses and policymakers are aware of Of course, you should want to get as many customers as possible for your web site ADA-related cases 25

  26. There are tons of other lawsuits and settlements relating to accessibility, although not focused on the web: ATMs Educational materials Podcasting Paper money NFB vs. Oracle (ERP software purchased by a state government) Other Lawsuits, Non-Web 26

  27. ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (PL 110-325) Re-defined the definition of disability to be more inclusive USACM had a policy statement approved, encouraging expansion of accessibility law to private web sites http://www.acm.org/public-policy/accessibility U.S. Dept. of Transportation guidelines New rules in effect May 13, 2009 for airlines No discriminatory pricing for people with disabilities New notice for proposed rulemaking coming soon, for airline web sites and kiosks Other policy activity… 27

  28. A very few states (e.g. California) have laws that require that private companies make their web sites accessible Other states have bills that have been introduced to require web accessibility for private companies, but often, these bills do not get passed These may have a questionable impact, since even web sites that legally are required to be accessible (such as federal and state government) often have very low rates of accessibility) Current State Legislation 28

  29. Regardless of what laws, policies, or guidelines say, the web isn’t accessible yet! While many government web sites are accessible (but not all, as required by law), most private web sites are not 80% of general web sites as inaccessible seems like a good estimate from multiple studies It depends on what categories of web sites Companies still fight this, since there’s a lot of confusion, and they don’t like regulation But how accessible is the web? 29

  30. As we move to (or already are there) web 2.0, e-government, e-commerce, social networking, there is inherently a need for security features on web sites These include: Passwords Security questions Human interaction proofs How can we ensure that these features are accessible for different user populations? The other slides will cover these topics How does this relate to security? 30

  31. Making web pages or features accessible is not technically challenging when done right An accessible web site does not need to appear any different to someone without an impairment…it just looks like a normal site Retro-fitting an existing web site for accessibility takes much more work than adding the features during initial design Often, the easiest way to make a web site accessible is to include accessibility as a requirement in the next web site re-design cycle. So when it’s re-designed, the new design is fully accessible Process and Design 31

More Related