1 / 17

John Owen Centre for Program Evaluation The University of Melbourne

Evaluation in a Changing World Reflections on the Australasian 2012 Evaluation International Conference www.aes.asn.au. John Owen Centre for Program Evaluation The University of Melbourne Canberra Evaluation Forum, 18 September, 2012. Reflection 1:.

cathyperez
Télécharger la présentation

John Owen Centre for Program Evaluation The University of Melbourne

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation in a Changing WorldReflections on the Australasian 2012 Evaluation International Conferencewww.aes.asn.au John Owen Centre for Program Evaluation The University of Melbourne Canberra Evaluation Forum, 18 September, 2012

  2. Reflection 1: Conference as an Evaluation Object [Intervention] Conference is an Event. But AES conference has no objectives: maybe resort to needs

  3. Participant Needs (acceptable) • Acquire new theoretical understandings (guest speakers) • Access relevant knowledge (selected papers) • Target individuals with common interests (networking) • Learn new skills (workshops)

  4. Participant Needs (less acceptable?) • Break from the workplace • Reward for diligence • Meeting with cronies • Social interactions away from home Conference Evaluation: Were Acceptable Needs Met? Little published literature.

  5. Reflection 2: On Content: Evaluation/Intervention Interface Evaluation as systematic enquiry to (i)specify (ii) refine or (iii) assess the worth of an intervention.

  6. Assessing Worth (Evaluation of Practice) Key concepts: settled intervention, objectives based, episodic. Example: John Liddle and Bronte Koop. Cost Benefit Analysis in Educational Evaluation: Is it worth it? Intervention Evaluation

  7. Specify (Evaluation into Practice) Key concepts: evidence-based practice, meta analyses, program logic, policy development Example: Terry Buss. Policy-makers as a Constituency for Evidence-based Policy: Expanding the Partnership. Evaluation Intervention

  8. Refinement (Evaluation in Practice) Key concepts: intervention evolving, rapid response, monitoring, strategic interactivity Example: Amanda Jupp. Designing a Results Based Management Approach within the Private Sector Intervention Intervention Intervention Evaluation Evaluation

  9. Reflection 3: On Content: Emerging Practices • Evaluation Capacity Building • Evaluation of Complex Programs • Evaluation of Programs for the Disadvantaged/International Development • Realist Methods

  10. Reflection 3: On Content: Emerging Practices • Use of Technology in Data Management Example: Robert Kirkpatrick. Harnessing the Power of Real-Time Data: A 21st Century Approach to Monitoring and Evaluation. www.unglobalpulse.org [EES Conference Helsinki, 2012]

  11. Reflection 4: On Missing Topics • Evaluation Theory eg Theory of Valuing, etc • Evaluation Standards eg Feasibility, Propriety, etc • Relations with Cognate Disciplines (policy analysis, market research)

  12. Reflection 5: On Ways Forward • Program Logic as Basis for Conference Evaluation (Harness Relevant Research) • Guest speakers: Must deliver on Latest Concepts/Theories (e.g. Patton in Adelaide) • Redress the Practice-Theory Balance www.aes.asn.au/2012-aes-conference-papers.html

More Related