1 / 16

Impact: Climate Knowledge Exchange Network 27 th June, 2012

Impact: Climate Knowledge Exchange Network 27 th June, 2012. The ‘Higher Ambitions’ for Impact. The REF should take better account of the impact research makes on the economy and society

cato
Télécharger la présentation

Impact: Climate Knowledge Exchange Network 27 th June, 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Impact: Climate Knowledge Exchange Network 27th June, 2012

  2. The ‘Higher Ambitions’ for Impact • The REF should take better account of the impact research makes on the economy and society • The REF should continue to incentivise research excellence, but also reflect the quality of researchers’ contribution to public policy making and to public engagement, and not create disincentives to researchers moving between academia and the private sector • Those institutions that can demonstrate a track record of delivering impact from their research will be rewarded • This will help us understand and reinforce over time the way in which different funding choices are creating economic impact • This will complement the continuing focus of the Research Councils in driving up the economic impact of the research base

  3. The ‘Higher Ambitions’ for Impact • The REF should take better account of the impact research makes on the economy and society • The REF should continue to incentivise research excellence, but also reflect the quality of researchers’ contribution to public policy making and to public engagement, and not create disincentives to researchers moving between academia and the private sector • Those institutions that can demonstrate a track record of delivering impact from their research will be rewarded • This will help us understand and reinforce over time the way in which different funding choices are creating economic impact • This will complement the continuing focus of the Research Councils in driving up the economic impact of the research base

  4. Alan Mathison Turing, English mathematician and computer scientist Fred Inglis, Emeritus Professor of Cultural Studies at the University of Sheffield

  5. Turing and Inglis: an ‘Igniting Slur’? • “Wherever one goes in the present-day British University, one finds not just general but universal agreement as to the fatuity of the “impact” criterion in the revoltingly named research excellence framework......... The language of the REF is everywhere flatulent and frequently mendacious, never more so than when defining impact ....it sounds bloody ludicrous”.

  6. Enhanced professional standards, ethics, guidelines or training Improved health or welfare outcomes Improved risk management Public debate has been shaped or informed by research Improved quality, accessibility or efficiency of a public service Most effective management or workplace practices Improved business performance Changes to the design or delivery of the school curriculum Policy debate or decisions have been influenced or shaped by research A social enterprise initiative has been created Production costs have reduced Research has enabled stakeholders to challenge conventional wisdom Improved forensic methods or expert systems Organisations have adapted to changing cultural values Enhanced preservation, conservation or presentation of cultural heritage Improved access to justice, employment or education Research has informed public understanding, values, attitudes or behaviours Improved management or conservation of natural resources Enhanced corporate social responsibility policies Jobs have been created or protected Levels of waste have reduced Changes to legislation or regulations A new product has been commercialised The policies or activities of NGO’s or charities have been informed by research Enhanced technical standards or protocols New forms of artistic expression or changes to creative practice Changes in professional practice

  7. ev·i·dence noun, verb, ev·i·denced, ev·i·denc·ing. • noun • 1. that which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof. • 2. something that makes plain or clear; • 3. Law . data presented to a court or jury in proof of the facts in issue and which may include the testimony of witnesses, records, documents, or objects. • verb (used with object) • 4. to make evident or clear; show clearly; manifest; • 5. to support by evidence.

  8. Measures Improved Documented changes Evidence from audit change in guidelines enhanced awareness public understanding Critical reviews public debate Increased Documented shift service change Business performance measures Sales Demonstrable collaborations Commercial adoption policy debate Changes Influence Published Verifiable influence Traceable reference Priority shifts Visitor or audience numbers and feedback Attainment Engagement Standards, protocols, codes Improvements Citation Parliamentary or other democratic debate Visitor or audience numbers Quantitative data Publication and sales figures Growth Data Inclusion Descriptions Information Agreements Acknowledgements Evaluations

  9. Measures Improved Documented changes Evidence from audit change in guidelines enhanced awarenesspublic understanding Critical reviews public debate Increased Documented shift service change Business performance measures Sales Demonstrable collaborations Commercial adoption policy debate Changes Influence Published Verifiable influence Traceable reference Priority shifts Visitor or audience numbers and feedback Attainment Engagement Standards, protocols, codes Improvements Citation Parliamentary or other democratic debate Visitor or audience numbers Quantitative data Publication and sales figures Growth Data Inclusion Descriptions Information Agreements Acknowledgements Evaluations

  10. Measures Improved Documented changes Evidence fromaudit change in guidelines enhanced awareness public understanding Critical reviews public debate Increased Documented shift service change Business performance measures Sales Demonstrable collaborations Commercial adoption policy debate ChangesInfluencePublished Verifiable influence Traceable reference Priority shifts Visitor or audience numbers and feedback Attainment Engagement Standards, protocols, codes Improvements Citation Parliamentary or other democratic debate Visitor or audience numbers Quantitative data Publication and sales figures Growth Data Inclusion Descriptions Information Agreements Acknowledgements Evaluations

  11. Definitions • Impact: • An effect on, change or benefit to the economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health, the environment or quality of life, beyond academia • Evidence: • Something demonstrable that is both verifiable and traceable to underpinning research carried out by the submitting unit

  12. Interdisciplinary Impact: the 3G Telecom Auction • £22.47 billion raised for the taxpayer – enough money to fund 400 new hospitals – from RCUK funded research. • The auction was designed by a team of economists from the ESRC Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution (ELSE) based at University College London using game theory to develop the discipline of mechanism design. • Its success was therefore seen as a spectacular demonstration of the value of government investment in blue skies research.

  13. Climate Change Impacts

  14. Interdisciplinary Impact and Climate Change • “Flooded roads, blocked railway lines and devastated homes – the severe flooding last autumn in Britain and other European countries reminded us how vulnerable modern society can be to extreme weather ....... The main challenge facing business in making sense of climate change lies in the complexity and uncertainty of its impacts.... To address these questions, we need interdisciplinary research”. • April 2001, The Edge, ESRC magazine

  15. What is Exeter doing about impact? Impact Review Group (IRG): reviewing all case studies and statements yearly and providing feedback Impact Strategy Group (ISG) identifying impact strategies for the REF and for RCUK at local, national and international level, and facilitating their implementation Support and Funding: To calibrate or test impact at the University with external expertise and advice, including guidance from lay members of Council. DESCRIBE project: £100k of external funding to undertake a systematic review of the evidence for Impact The Exeter Catalyst for the Public Engagement with research: £300k of external funding to embed a culture of public engagement with research across the institution

  16. HEFCE Timetable

More Related