1 / 35

Reliable/reliability computing for concrete structures: Methodology and software tools

Reliable/reliability computing for concrete structures: Methodology and software tools. D. Novak R. Pukl. Brno University of Technology Brno, Czech Republic. Cervenka Consulting, Prague, Czech Republic. + many co-workers!. Outline.

cayla
Télécharger la présentation

Reliable/reliability computing for concrete structures: Methodology and software tools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reliable/reliability computing for concrete structures: Methodology and software tools D. Novak R. Pukl Brno University of Technology Brno, Czech Republic Cervenka Consulting, Prague, Czech Republic + many co-workers!

  2. Outline • A complex and systematic methodoloy for concrete structures assessment • Experiment • Deterministic computational model development to capture experiment • Inverse analysis • Deterministic nonlinear computational model of a structure • Stochastic model of a structure • Statistical, sensitivity and reliability analyses • Methods and software • Uncertainties simulation • Nonlinear behaviour of concrete • Application 2/18 2/25

  3. Experiment • The key part of the methodology, carefully performed and evaluated • Material parameters of concrete: compressive strength, modulus of elasticity… • Fracture-mechanical parameters: tensile strength, fracture energy… • Eg. three-point bending… 2/18 3/25

  4. Experiment • The meaning of „experiment“ in a broader sense • Laboratory experiment • In-situ experiment on a real structure (a part of health monitoring) • At elastic level only • Other parameters, eg. eigenfrequencies… 2/18 4/25

  5. Deterministic computational model 2/18 5/25

  6. Inverse analysis Numerical model of structure appropriate material model many (material) parameters Information about parameters: • experimental data • recommended formulas • engineering estimation Correction of parameters: • „trial – and – error“ method • sofisticated identification methods • – artificial neural network + stochastic calculations (LHS) 2/18 6/25

  7. Artificial neural network Modeling of processes in brain (1943 - McCulloch-Pitts Perceptron) Various fields of technical practice Neural network type – Multi-layer perceptron: - set of neurons arrangedin several layers - all neurons in one layer are connected with all neurons of the following layer Output from 1 neuron: 2/18 7/25

  8. Artificial neural network active period(simulation of process) Two phases: adaptive period (training) Training of network: - training set, i.e. ordered pair [pi, yi] Minimization of criterion: N – number of ordered pairsinput - outputin training set; – required output value ofk-thoutputneuron ati-thinput; – real output value (at same input). 2/18 8/25

  9. Scheme of inverse analysis Structural response Material model parameters Stochastic calculation (LHS) – training set for calibration of synaptic weights and biases 2/18 9/25

  10. Computational model of structure • The result of inverse analysis – the set of idetified computational model parameters • For calculation of a real structure, first at deterministic level 2/18 10/25

  11. Stochastic model of structure For calculation of a real structure, second at stochastic level Table of basic random variables + correlation matrix 2/18 11/25

  12. LHS: Step 1 - simulation Huntington & Lyrintzis (1998) • Mean value: accurately • Stand. deviation: significant improvement 2/18 14/25

  13. LHS: Step 2 – imposing statistical correlation variable • Simulated annealing: Probability to escape from local minima • Cooling - decreasing of system excitation • Boltzmann PDF, energetic analogy simulation 2/18 15/25

  14. LHS: Step 2 – imposing statistical correlation variable simulation 2/18 16/25

  15. Sensitivity analysis INPUT INPUT OUTPUT OUTPUT x1,1 q1,1 R1 p1 … … … … … … … … … … … … x1,N q1,N R, N pN • Nonparametric rank-order correlation between • input variables ane output response variable • Kendall tau • Spearman • Robust - uses only orders • Additional result of LHS simulation, no extra effort • Bigger correlation coefficient = high sensitivity • Relative measure of sensitivity (-1, 1) 17/25 2/18

  16. Reliability analysis • Simplified – • as constrained by extremally small • number of simulations (10-100)! • Cornell safety index • Curve fitting • FORM, importance sampling • response surface… 2/18 18/25

  17. ATENA • Well-balanced approach for practical applications of advanced FEM in civil engineering • Numerical core – state-of-art background • User friendly Graphical user environment • visualization + interaction 2/18 22/25

  18. Material models for concrete: ATENA software • Numerical core –advanced nonlinear material models • concrete • damage based models • SBETA model • fracture-plastic model • microplane M4 (Bažant) • steel • multi-linear uniaxial law • von Mises 2/18 19/25

  19. Material models for concrete: ATENA software • Numerical core – advanced nonlinear material models • concrete in tension • tensile cracks • post-peak behavior • smeared crack approach • crack band method • fracture energy • fixed or rotated cracks • crack localization • size-effect is captured 2/18 20/25

  20. Software tools: SARA Studio Probabilistic software FReET http://www.freet.cz + Software for nonlinear fracture mechanics analysis ATENA 2/18 21/25

  21. FREET • Probabilistic techniques • Crude Monte Carlo simulation • Latin Hypercube Sampling (3 types) • First Order Reliability Method (FORM) • Curve fitting • Simulated Annealing • Bayesian updating • Response/Limit state function • Closed form (direct) using implemented • Equation Editor (simpleproblems) • Numerical (indirect) using user-defined DLL function preparedpractically in..any programming language (C++, Fortran, Delphi, etc.) • General interface to third-parties software using user-defined *.BAT or *.EXE http://www.freet.cz 2/18 23/25

  22. Software tools: SARA Studio 2/18 24/25

  23. Designed FRC facade panels • glass fibre-reinforced cement based composite • dimensions 2050×1050×13.5 mm • vacuum-treated laboratoryexperiment 10/18

  24. Test of FRC facade panel deflectometer 11/18

  25. Experiment Three point bending tests of notched specimens (40 reference, 40 degraded) Unit Value Length mm 200 Height mm 40 Width mm 40 Notch depth mm 15 Span mm 180 4/18

  26. Experiment – summary Materiálové parametry Load-deflection diagrams –reference specimens Load-deflection diagrams – degraded specimens 6/18

  27. Inverse analysis Based on coupling of nonlinear fracture mechanics FEM modelling(ATENA), probabilistic stratified simulation for training neural network (FREET) and artificial neural network (DLLNET): Scheme of numerical model of three point bending test 8/18

  28. Synthesis of experimental results 9/18

  29. Nonlinear numerical model • ATENA 3D: • smeared cracks (Crack Band Model) • material model 3D Non Linear Cementitious • continuous loading – wind intake • Newton-Raphson solution method • the loading increment step of 1 kN/m2 12/18

  30. Stochastic model – introduction • Latin hypercube sampling; simulated annealing; ATENA/FREET/SARA • Correlation matrix of basic random variables for reference panel (R) and fordegraded panel (D): 13/18

  31. Stochastic model – summary Random l-d curves –reference panel Random l-d curves – panel after degradation 14/18

  32. Statistical analysis Ultimate load –reference panel Ultimate load – panel after degradation 15/18

  33. Statistical and sensitivity analysis Results of statistical analysis: Results of sensitivity analysis: 16/18

  34. Theoretical failure probabilities 17/18

  35. Conclusions • Efficient techniques of both nonlinear analysis and stochastic simulation methods were combined bridging: • theory and praxis • reliability and nonlinear computation • Software tools (SARA=ATENA+FREET) for the assessment of real behavior of concrete structures • A wide range of applicability both practical and theoretical - gives an opportunity for further intensive development • Procedure can be applied for any problem of quasibrittle modeling of concrete structures 2/18 25/25

More Related