1 / 26

Outbreak of E. coli O104:H4 heralds a new paradigm in responding to disease threats

Outbreak of E. coli O104:H4 heralds a new paradigm in responding to disease threats. Nicola J. Holden Leighton Pritchard. EHEC O104:H4 outbreak, Europe 2011. Unprecedented: scale of outbreak (3950 affected, 53 deaths; multiple import restrictions)

cecilia-lancaster
Télécharger la présentation

Outbreak of E. coli O104:H4 heralds a new paradigm in responding to disease threats

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Outbreak of E. coli O104:H4 heralds a new paradigm in responding to disease threats Nicola J. Holden Leighton Pritchard

  2. EHEC O104:H4 outbreak, Europe 2011 Unprecedented: • scale of outbreak(3950 affected, 53 deaths; multipleimport restrictions) • emerging pathogen(one previous case in S.Korea) • rapid production of sequence data • crowd-sourcing of assembly, and annotation viaGitHubhttps://github.com/ehec-outbreak-crowdsourced/BGI-data-analysis/wiki

  3. EHEC O104:H4 outbreak, Europe 2011 Unprecedented: • scale of outbreak(3950 affected, 53 deaths; multipleimport restrictions) • emerging pathogen(one previous case in S.Korea) • rapid production of sequence data • crowd-sourcing of assembly and annotation via collaborative revision control site: GitHubhttps://github.com/ehec-outbreak-crowdsourced/BGI-data-analysis/wiki

  4. EHEC O104:H4 outbreak – timeline • 1st May: onset of outbreak • 26th May: strain characteristics (Scheutzet al., 2012 Eurosurveill) • 30th May: diagnostic laboratory information released (Muenster) • 2nd June: first draft assembly available (GitHub) • 9th to 21st June: additional sequences announced • 22nd June: Microbiological characteristics published (Bielaszewskaet al., 2011 LID) • 26th July: official end of the outbreak (RKI) refs: https://github.com/ehec-outbreak-crowdsourced/BGI-data-analysis/wiki; RKI; Institute of Hygiene, Muenster

  5. EHEC O104:H4 outbreak – timeline

  6. EHEC O104:H4 outbreak – timeline • 1st May: onset of outbreak • 26th May: strain characteristics (Scheutzet al., 2012 Eurosurveill) • 30th May: diagnostic laboratory information released (Muenster) • 2nd June: first draft assembly available (GitHub) • 9th to 21st June: additional sequences announced • 22nd June: Microbiological characteristics published (Bielaszewskaet al., 2011 LID) • 26th July: official end of the outbreak (RKI) refs: https://github.com/ehec-outbreak-crowdsourced/BGI-data-analysis/wiki; RKI; Institute of Hygiene, Muenster

  7. EHEC O104:H4 outbreak – timeline • 27th July: Publication of open-source genomic analysis

  8. A changing paradigm? • Kwan et al. (2011) http://precedings.nature.com/documents/6663/version/1

  9. Meanwhile: diagnostics 27th June – 6th July • Outbreak isolate-specific, sub-serotype diagnostics • Exploit rapid sequencing: work directly from incomplete and unordered draft genome sequences • Rapidly generated (perhaps ahead of the biology?) • Validated (good estimates of error rates) • Easy to use and distribute • Cheap(erthan sequencing everything)

  10. Meanwhile: diagnostics 27th June – 6th July • Outbreak isolate-specific, sub-serotype diagnostics • Exploit rapid sequencing: work directly from incomplete and unordered draft genome sequences • Rapidly generated (perhaps ahead of the biology?) • Validated (good estimates of error rates) • Easy to use and distribute • Cheap(erthan sequencing everything) Alignment-free PCR primer design: no need to identify conserved signature sequences prior to primer design

  11. Alignment-free primer design: strategy • ‘Positive’ genome set: 11 genome assemblies of 9 EHEC O104:H4 outbreak isolates (GitHub crowdsourcing) • ‘Negative’ genome set: 31 genomes of E. coli and E. fergusonii (GenBank) • Design many (>1000) primers to positivegenome set:target CDS; optimise for qRT; 20 mers; 100 bpamplicons; TA = 58 oC • Filter primers in silico: • Exclude sets with predicted productive amplification in negativegenomes. • Screen primers to exclude sets with strong sequence similarity to any of a larger set of off-target genomes: (GenBankEnterobacteriaceae)

  12. Alignment-free primer design: strategy • ‘Positive’ genome set: 11 genome assemblies of 9 EHEC O104:H4 outbreak isolates (GitHub crowdsourcing) • ‘Negative’ genome set: 31 genomes of E. coli and E. fergusonii (GenBank) • Design many (>1000) primers to positivegenome set:target CDS; optimise for qRT; 20 mers; 100 bpamplicons; TA = 58 oC • Filter primers in silico: • Exclude sets with predicted productive amplification in negativegenomes. • Screen primers to exclude sets with strong sequence similarity to any of a larger set of off-target genomes: (GenBankEnterobacteriaceae)

  13. Automation https://github.com/widdowquinn/find_differential_primers

  14. Alignment-free primer design 1. Process configurationfiles: Locations and classes of input sequence files. III ... II ... I IV 2. Convert to single (pseudo)chromosomes: Concatenate draft genome sequence. Positive ... V ... Negative 3. Genome feature locations: From GBK file or predicted from Prodigal.

  15. Primer prediction (on positive set) III II 4. Predict primer locations: > 1000 thermodynamically plausible primer sets on each (pseudo)chromosome, using Primer3. I IV Positive V Negative

  16. Test cross-amplification in silico III II 5. Check cross-amplification: All primer sets tested against other organisms, using PrimerSearch. I IV Positive V 6. BLAST screen: All primers screened for off-target sequences with BLAST: 7 possible primer sets Negative

  17. Classify primers and validation ... 7. Classify primers: Classified primer sets according to their ability to amplify specific classes of input sequence. I III IV V +ve -ve ... II ... III ... IV V ... 8. Validate primers: Primer set validated on positive and negative targets in vitro. 5 target sequences: prophage gp20 (2) hypothetical CDS (2) impB (1)

  18. Validation • In silico, diagnostic primers are just another classifier • Validation on unseendata is critical • (avoid overfitting, estimation of performance) • Direct experimental validation of primer candidates (Münster): • ‘Positive’ set = 21 clinical outbreak isolates • ‘Negative’ set = 32 HUSEC / EPEC isolates • Positive control = LB 226692

  19. Primer design: validated in vitro positive negative

  20. Alignment-free primer design: summary • Individual primer sets: 100 % sensitivity; 82–94 % specificity; 9% < FDR < 22% • Combiningprimers: 100 % sensitivity and specificity • A minimal combination of two primer sets discriminated absolutely between outbreak O104:H4 isolates and non-outbreak E. coli isolates, including HUSEC 041 • Flexibility in strategy allows for targeted design, e.g. multiplex PCR / different organisms / large gene families etc.. • Same approach used for • Resolving Dickeya plant pathogens • Discriminating between RxLR effectors in Phytophthorainfestans

  21. Alignment-free primer design: summary • Bypass the need for: • multiple genomic alignments • biological justification for primer choice (maybe even reveal biology…) • Produce diagnostic primers for any subgroup of organisms (possibly…) • Limitations • Scaling issue: PrimerSearchis slow (modular pipeline allows use of alternative programs) • Low specificity of primers -> use qPCR • Very similar organisms may not be distinguished • Time from genomes to primer sets: 90 hours • possibility for improvements as collaborative bioinformatics projects (speed up off-target primer mapping, make into user-friendly tool…)

  22. Acknowledgements Thanks to Nadine Brandt, Kath Wright and Sean Chapman nicola.holden@hutton.ac.uk leighton.pritchard@hutton.ac.uk

  23. Sprouted seeds as a source of infections

  24. ‘Sproutbreak’ - Jimmy Johns restaurant

  25. Colonisation of spinach by VTEC O157:H7 Sakai (vt-)

  26. Referencec : www.slideshare.com

More Related