1 / 11

Responsible Conduct of Research

Responsible Conduct of Research. Publications. Authorship Acknowledging contributors Conflicts of interest Overlapping publications. www.icmje.org. Authors. Authorship credit should be based on

chance
Télécharger la présentation

Responsible Conduct of Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Responsible Conduct of Research Publications

  2. Authorship • Acknowledging contributors • Conflicts of interest • Overlapping publications www.icmje.org

  3. Authors • Authorship credit should be based on • 1) substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; • 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and • 3) final approval of the version to be published. • Authors should meet conditions 1, 2, and 3.

  4. Authors • No honorary authorship • No ghost authorship • Determine authorship as early as possible (first, second, and last authors)

  5. Acknowledgements • Editors should ask corresponding authors to declare whether they had assistance with study design, data collection, data analysis, or manuscript preparation. • If such assistance was available, the authors should disclose the identity of the individuals who provided this assistance and the entity that supported it in the published article. • Financial and material support should also be acknowledged.

  6. Writing Support • No ghostwriting • Modest writing support is generally OK • Writing support should be acknowledged

  7. Acknowledgements • Contributions do not justify authorship (e.g., “clinical investigators” ) • Contribution should be described (e.g., “collected data” or “provided and cared for study patients” ) • Must give written permission to be acknowledged.

  8. Conflicts of Interest • Potential Conflicts of Interest Related to Individual Authors' Commitments • Potential Conflicts of Interest Related to Project Support

  9. Overlapping Publications • > 10% overlap • Salami publications (LPU: Least Publishable Units) • Dual submissions

  10. Public Access http://publicaccess.nih.gov/

  11. Tell us about your experience

More Related