1 / 20

LACoFD Programs: Wildland Fire Prevention

LACoFD Programs: Wildland Fire Prevention. Introduction. P. MICHAEL FREEMAN, FIRE CHIEF, FORESTER AND FIRE WARDEN Region 1 Mutual Aid Coordinator Member, Blue Ribbon Commission LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT (SPECIAL FIRE DISTRICT)

Télécharger la présentation

LACoFD Programs: Wildland Fire Prevention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LACoFD Programs: Wildland Fire Prevention

  2. Introduction • P. MICHAEL FREEMAN, FIRE CHIEF, • FORESTER AND FIRE WARDEN • Region 1 Mutual Aid Coordinator • Member, Blue Ribbon Commission • LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT • (SPECIAL FIRE DISTRICT) • Accountable to the LA County Board of Supervisors • County-wide responsibility: 157 stations covering 2000 square miles, including • all of unincorporated LA County • 57 incorporated cities within LA County • 734 square miles of wildland interface - includes Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ)

  3. LACoFD Experience • MAJOR CHALLENGE: • “Santa Ana” weather conditions + • flammable wildland fuels = • history of major fires and structure loss • 1993 Kinneloa Fire (Altadena): 121 structures lost, • 1993 Old Topanga Fire: 352 structures lost • staggering losses despite firefighting efforts (RAND study concluded • 90% save ratio) • trying to change history

  4. LACoFD Firefighting Improvements 1993-1994 • cooperative helicopter response with Los Angeles (City) Fire Department • augmented staffing and response based on weather conditions • pre-attack plans • lease of 2 Super Scoopers and Air Crane aircraft • purchase of 2 Firehawk helicopters (from 360 gallon 1000 gallon tank) • water eductors

  5. Wildfire Safety Panel 1993-1994 • commissioned by the LA County Board of Supervisors • comprised of various subject-matter experts • developed 39 recommendations: - recommendations led to code changes, program changes - all 39 adopted by BOS for unincorporated LA county - the 22 incorporated cities in the VHFHSZ adopted most of the recommendations

  6. LACoFD Code Changes • windows: multi-paned glazing (more resistant to heat) • doors: solid core doors, not less than 1 and 3/8” thick • protection of openings (vent openings to attics and under-floor spaces): wire mesh to preclude embers from entering • residential sprinklers: required in specific cases • - unincorporated Malibu (Santa Monica Mountains) • - south-facing San Gabriel mountains for residences greater that 3 miles from the nearest fire station

  7. LACoFD Code Changes (cont’d) • accessory structures: car ports, trellises, etc. • - attached: one-hour fire resistive or heavy timber • - unattached: (20 feet or more from residence) wood not less • than 2” in diameter • pool draft system (plumbing and fire codes): all new pools in VHFHSZ that are greater than 5000 gallon capacity required to have draft hydrants - exception: already meet requirements for access and water • fuel modification plans (landscape/irrigation plans) for new construction/remodels in VHFHSZ: - approved by the Department (includes a variety of zones with specific requirements for planting and irrigation)

  8. LACoFD Vegetation Management • Use of prescribed (Rx) fire, mechanical, or biological means to reduce wildland fire fuel hazards. • Program components: • Rx burns (fire) • brush crusher (mechanical) • goats (biological) Cost/agency commitment: $2 million start-up costs ( personnel, support equipment, brush crusher and helitorch); trained, dedicated staff including hand crews, qualified “burn bosses”, qualified Rx burn manager Barriers: • Conflicting missions: conservation/preservation vs modification/prevention • Cumbersome federal requirements prevent timely completion of program Successes: • Cottontail and Monte Nido Rx burns: stopped wind-driven Malibu fires • La Crescenta Rx burn: formed buffer around extremely vulnerable community

  9. LACoFD Fuel Modification • Permanent alteration of combustible native or ornamental plants • to create a safety buffer around a community. Program components: • approved plant list, irrigation zone • part of the building permit process • final approved plan recorded with the county assessor on tract map Agency commitment: trained, dedicated staff to review plans, suggest modifications for code conformity, provide f/u inspections to ensure compliance Barriers: • conflicting missions of stakeholder agencies • potential community opposition to implementing fuel mod to existing • development Successes: • Stevenson Ranch - no structures lost in October 2003 fire

  10. minimum 20’ additional 30’ minimum 100’ to maximum 200’

  11. LACoFD Brush Clearance • Removal of combustible fuel , including native and ornamental vegetation, from around existing structures • Program components: • 38,000 declared parcels; annual notices sent to owners • clearance of 200’ in VHFHSZ • goal of 100% compliance prior to start of fire season Agency commitment: training fire station personnel to conduct inspections; data management; trained, dedicated staff of natural resource personnel (foresters); coordination with other County agencies (Ag, D.A.) for enforcement Barriers: • absentee owners • coordinating multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting missions Successes: • Calabasas Fire (1996) - 6 structures lost vs. 352 in Old Topanga Fire • City Of Claremont (2003) - 21 residences lost vs. 750 saved

  12. LACoFD Community Outreach • Building partnerships with other agencies and local citizens • to create a fire-safe community • Program components: • public education – printed materials/mailers, signage, annual notification, etc. • Multi-Agency Task Force on Wildland Fire Use • Firewise Communities/USA program • Joint Ventures Partnership: Implementing the National Fire Plan • Topanga Fire Safe Committee Barriers: • qualifying for funding to support local programs Successes: • Malibou Lake grant for brush clearance • Big Rock grant for goats (unable to utilize Rx burn) • Topanga Evacuation and Safe Refuge Program • La Crescenta Rx burn and vegetation management program

  13. Relevant Issues/Recommendations • Vegetation Management • Streamline federal and state processes (e.g., documentation). • Reduce environmental and air quality restrictions that limit vegetation management. • Ensure National Fire Plan grants/contracts are available for local use throughout the entire state. • Allocate federal/state funding for regional brush crushers. • Establish a Fire Safe Planning Committee in every county to: • a) coordinate planning, response, and recovery, • b) implement the Blue Ribbon Commission recommendations

  14. Relevant Issues/Recommendations • Fuel Modification • Encourage statewide adoption of fuel modification programs. • Develop and enforce retroactive fuel modification for existing wildland development with insurance incentives. • Brush Clearance • Promote adoption and enforcement of stringent building codes and brush clearance standards in wildland interface/intermix areas of the state. • Community Outreach • Involve the community in the Fire Safe Planning Committee efforts. • Promote expansion of Firewise Communities/USA throughout the state.

  15. Relevant Issues/Recommendations • Fire Suppression • Petition legislature for additional OES engines to expand mutual aid capabilities. • Request federal/state funding for augmented staffing levels during high fire hazard conditions. • Solicit federal/state coordination, support, and funding for wireless interoperability for first-responder agencies. • Seek congressional support for state-of-the-art federal firefighting aircraft, for use on forests posing threats to densely-populated areas.

  16. Relevant Issues/Recommendations • Fire Suppression(cont’d) • Encourage utilization of the Fire Safe Planning Committees to • a) ensure effective, multi-agency evacuation planning and drills • b) solicit consistent, long-term commitment to fire safe communities from elected officials. • c) coordinate an effective interface fire attack program within each county

More Related