1 / 33

Concerned Philosophers for Peace 2007 conference Manchester College Tom H. Hastings PeaceVoice

Public peace intellectuals Where are they? Who are they? Why didn’t they keep us out of war? Can they do better?. Concerned Philosophers for Peace 2007 conference Manchester College Tom H. Hastings PeaceVoice A project of the Oregon Peace Institute. Public intellectuals.

chandler
Télécharger la présentation

Concerned Philosophers for Peace 2007 conference Manchester College Tom H. Hastings PeaceVoice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Public peace intellectualsWhere are they?Who are they?Why didn’t they keep us out of war?Can they do better? Concerned Philosophers for Peace 2007 conference Manchester College Tom H. Hastings PeaceVoice A project of the Oregon Peace Institute Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  2. Public intellectuals By a public intellectual, I mean someone who uses general ideas drawn from history, philosophy, political science, economics, law, literature, ideas that are part of the cultural intellectual tradition of the world, to address contemporary events, usually of a political or ideological flavor, and does so in the popular media, whether in the form of Op Ed pieces, television appearances, signing full-page advertisements, or writing magazine articles or books addressed to a general audience. —Richard A. Posner Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  3. Public philosophy? American politics lacks an animating vision of the good society, and of the shared obligations of citizenship. —Michael Sandel Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  4. Peace philosophy Schools of philosophy call for the Sandelist communitarian view, the Rawlsian individual rights liberalism, with principled arguments over fairness, economic justice, human rights, the person and the society and so forth and so on—where is the argument for nonviolent conflict management? Who is making the argument that peace is a human right? Why isn’t this even on the scoreboard? Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  5. Where are peace intellectuals? • Peace and Justice Studies Association • Concerned Philosophers for Peace • Wisconsin Institute for Peace and Conflict Studies • Peace and Conflict Studies Consortium • International Peace Research Association • various other academic peace sections in disciplines • peace and justice institutes • nongovernmental organizations • independent peace scholars Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  6. Why didn’t they keep us out of war? Silent enim leges inter arma—In war, the law is silent, said Cicero in 52 B.C. So, it would seem, were the peace scholars as the Bush administration sold the invasion of Iraq to the American electorate. Were peace professors afraid? Discouraged? Disempowered? Doing something else more important? Were we simply overwhelmed and not competent enough to stand effectively against lies, faulty thinking, ahistorical claims and shrill fearmongering? Or is there a vast media conspiracy that rejects our writing, our thinking, our peace analysis and our right to explain it publicly? Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  7. What good is your voice? There is little evidence that public intellectuals are highly influential. If this is right, there is little payoff to the public as a whole in becoming well informed about the limitations of academic expertise and even less to an individual member of the public; a single individual’s opinion on an issue of public moment is unlikely to be influential—which is why voters tend to be poorly informed about such issues. —Richard A. Posner Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  8. The uniformed electorate Is Posner correct? Is the lack of influence by one public intellectual the reason voters are ill-informed? Or could it be that voters are overwhelmed with the incessant drum of the Big Lie and the endless drone of the master narrative of the war system? Careful, careful danger near! We will tell you whom to fear. Whom to loathe and whom to hate and when we must retaliate! love, The War System Media Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  9. Th-th-that's all, folks! Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  10. Who reads your opinion? Op-eds serve as an inexpensive way to get your message out to the public, and are quite often read by decision makers and opinion leaders. —The Communications Network Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  11. Problems • hostile media • incompetent writing • discouraged writers • time issues Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  12. Hostile media Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  13. Boring writing Public-intellectual goods are entertainment goods and solidarity goods as well as information goods. —Richard Posner Peace is more than bovine placidity. -Teilhard de Chardin Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  14. Size matters In the op-ed world, like the spy game, smaller is better. Actually, precision is best. If you write a piece 500 words long and send it to a paper that wants 700 words, you won’t get it placed. Most papers seem to prefer 500-700 words, but it varies widely. Don’t make the editor cut it. Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  15. Time issues Good morning! Time to finish grading papers for your 2 p.m. class so you can make your 8 a.m. meeting with the Chair, the 9 a.m. Retention committee meeting, the 10 a.m.-noon advising sessions, the working lunch with the conference committee, the 1 p.m. faculty meeting... Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  16. And now, how? • establish expertise • bootstrap from your credentials into various media • be persistent • be fresh • be timely • be focused • target markets with a market-specific hook • take a position • stress exclusivity • think over the horizon • write tight, argue actively Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  17. Establish and use your expertise A timely, well-written and provocative piece can establish the writer as an expert on a particular topic. —DePaul University Media Relations Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  18. Leverage and be dependable Use your credentials to assist your marketability into print pages, which can sometimes in turn result in other media interest. “Newspaper editors and broadcasting producers regularly read the Op-Ed pages of national newspapers when seeking experts on particular subjects. Op-Ed editors also solicit pieces from writers with whom they have established a relationship or people with expertise on topics in the news.” —DePaul University Media Relations Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  19. Be persistent If your Op-Ed is rejected at one publication, don’t be discouraged. —DePaul University Media Relations Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  20. Discouraged writers When being interviewed by a young writer, Pearl Buck mentioned some rejection and the young woman said, “But you don’t get rejected. You’re Pearl Buck.” Pearl Buck replied, “Young woman, I am a writer. I get rejections.” Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  21. Keep it in perspective The Good Earth by Pearl S. Buck was returned fourteen times, but it went on to win a Pulitzer Prize. Norman Mailer’s The Naked and the Dead was rejected twelve times. Twenty publishers felt that Richard Bach’s Jonathan Livingston Seagull was for the birds. Before he wrote Roots, Alex Haley had received 200 rejections. Robert Persig's classic, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, couldn’t get started at 121 houses. Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  22. Be fresh, original, and contrarian An original point of view…will also make your piece stand out.…A point of view contrary to prevailing public opinion or the newspaper’s editorial position will also greatly improve your placement chances. —DePaul University Media Relations Be timely, controversial, but not outrageous. Be the voice of reason. —John McLain, McLain Communications Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  23. Focus The single most important piece of advice I can offer is to make your column about one thing. Only one thing.…Try to say what you want to say in a headline. If you can’t phrase your main point in six or eight words, you probably need to do more thinking. —Glenn Kranzley, Editor, The Morning Call Comment Pages Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  24. Target and hook If you want your piece published in a specific market, target it. Do you wish to write to the decisionmakers in Eugene, Oregon? Mention something or someone that connects obviously to Eugene. Read the Register-Guard. Do they like 700 words? Write between 690-710. Show them something that none of them could have written. Work on the peg, the hook, the angle. Think globally, write locally. Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  25. Take a position An op-ed is not an essay, something that slowly unrolls like a carpet, building momentum to some point or conclusion. It’s just the opposite. In an op-ed, you essentially state your conclusion first. You make your strongest point up front, then spend the rest of the op-ed making your case, or back-filling with the facts. Don’t equivocate. Educate your readers without being preachy. —John McLain, McLain Communications Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  26. Stress exclusivity Editors want to be the first to publish any piece. The more content of their paper that is original to them, the better. This is becoming a different world now that we have blogs. If you really want to convince an editor that your piece is original and exclusive, stress that you are holding back from publishing electronically until you have a decision from that editor. Otherwise, be honest about blogging your piece and never ever offer an already printed piece as exclusive; always be forthright will all editors. Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  27. Think over the horizon Anticipate anniversaries, seasonal news, pending legislation and threatening wars. Be accurate in your facts and assertions. Speculate conservatively but backed by the facts and precedent. Have a nose for what is going to be news and show editors you can get something to her or him first. Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  28. Write tight and argue actively Find, sort, examine, try out, polish, and use active verbs (like this sentence). Skip the boring, hyperbolic, leading, substitute-for-facts-and-research adjectives and adverbs (unlike this sentence). “Near the end, clearly re-state your position and issue a call to action.” —John McLain, McLain Communications Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  29. PeaceVoice You are still in the bind of time. It takes time to compose and polish an op-ed. It takes time and fiddling around to look for an outlet. That is the advantage of PeaceVoice, a project of the Oregon Peace Institute. We are funded by an Oregonian family foundation to be your free op-ed literary agent. You write; we strive to place it for you. Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  30. PeaceVoice operates for you Write your 400-700 word commentary and send it to PeaceVoiceDirector@gmail.com. We will in turn send a teaser of your piece to hundreds of editors across the U.S. If one of them asks to see the entire piece, we send your full text to them exclusively. If that editor uses your piece, we then move the full text to our website and any editor can freely reprint. Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  31. Whatever you can do or dream you can begin it. Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it. Begin it now. -Goethe Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  32. A public intellectual in play Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

  33. Go public!Someone needs to speak up... Public peace intellectuals: Tom H. Hastings, pcwtom@gmail.com, http://www.peacevoice.info/

More Related