1 / 35

Smart Garage Door System

Smart Garage Door System. May03-03 Client: Sr. Design Faculty Advisors: Dr. John Lamont Dr. Ralph Patterson Team Members: Dave Barto Kyle Leinen Ben Molayal Brodie Pederson

charlotte
Télécharger la présentation

Smart Garage Door System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Smart Garage Door System May03-03 Client: Sr. Design Faculty Advisors: Dr. John Lamont Dr. Ralph Patterson Team Members: Dave Barto Kyle Leinen Ben Molayal Brodie Pederson March 12, 2014

  2. Introductory Materials Problem Statement Operating Environment Intended Uses/Users Assumptions and Limitations End Product Description Project Activity Description Accomplishments Approaches Definition Activities Research Activities Design Activities Implementation Activities Testing and Modification Activities Other Significant Activities Resources and Schedules Resource Requirements Schedules Closing Materials Project Evaluation Commercialization Recommendations for Additional Work Lessons Learned Risk and Risk Management Closing Summary PresentationOutline

  3. Problem Statement General Background: • Auto-Closing Garage Door System • Convenience for homeowner • Home security Technical Issues: • Remote transmitting • State of the Garage Door • Signal Processing • Operation of Garage Door Opener • External Lighting Circuit

  4. Operating Environment • Located Inside Garage • Operational at (–) 40 to 120 Degrees Fahrenheit Conditions • Used with Chain or Screw Drive Openers • Residential Systems Only • Two-Door Garages

  5. Intended Users/Uses Intended Users: • Home Owners • Family or Neighbors Intended Uses: • Automatic Closure of the Garage Door • ON/OFF Capabilities • NOT intended for Commercial or Industrial Use

  6. Assumptions and Limitations Assumptions: • Installed on Residential Grade Openers Only • Power Source Maintained by the End User • Obstruction Sensors Previously Installed Limitations: • Door Opener must have external contacts • Maximum of Two Garage Doors

  7. End Product Description Features: • Rail-type Residential Grade Garage Door Systems • Adjustable timer for Automatic Closure • Two Garage Door Operation • Override mode for leaving door open without timer • Can be retrofitted for state-controlled openers

  8. What Has Been Done? Accomplishments: • Defined the Problem • Determined the Technical Design • Located and Received all Parts • Finished all Necessary Documentation • Implementation of the Design • Testing • Final Documentation • Oral Presentation to Industrial Review Panel

  9. Possible Approaches • Building a Transmitter/Receiver from scratch vs. Buying a Fabricated Unit • Building a “Hard-Wired” Logic Circuit vs. Signal Processing • Different Types of Sensors for Input • Pressure Pad for Tire • Contact Limit Switches • Magnetic Switches • IR (Obstruction) Sensor • Light Sensor • Using Openers with Exterior Contacts vs. Determining the Internal Circuitry

  10. Solution Approach Scenarios: • Leaving Garage • Returning Home • Desire to have the Garage Door Open Sensing: • Contact Switches • Light Sensors

  11. Final Project Definition Functionality: • Operative in any environment • Timers • Door Timer • Lights Timer • Safety and Environmental • Light Sensor • Contact Limit Switches • Signal Processing • Micro-Controller (HC11) • Power Relays • Four-button Controller • Transmitter/Receiver • Wall Mounting

  12. Research Activities Research: • Internet and Advisors • Transmitter/Receiver – located and purchased online • Relays – located and purchased online • Micro-controllers – used ISUs HC11 • Sensors – Door Store, Previous Lab Projects Free Door Opener: • Sears 1/3 H.P. Rail type - Chain driven • Manufactured in 1992 • Not Compatible with Recent Obstruction Sensors

  13. Technical Approach • Garage Door Scenarios: • Hard Wired Logic Circuit vs. Micro-Controller • Design vs. Purchasing a Transmitter/Receiver Unit

  14. TechnicalDesign

  15. Technical Design

  16. Technical Design General Lighting Circuit

  17. Technical Design

  18. Implementation Activities Problems Encountered: • Downloading Code to Motorola HC11E9 EVBU Board • Switched to Motorola F1HC11 Board that was used in Cpr E 211. • Important Part of Magnetic Sensors Missing • Part Built into Genie Systems. Changed to Contact Limit Switch. • Obstruction Sensors Not Compatible with Door Opener • Eliminate Obstruction Sensor as input to SGDS because of FCC Regulation in 1993.

  19. Testing and Modifications Testing: • SGDS Broken into 7 Different Individual Tests • Tested as whole afterwards Test 1 – Transmitter and Receiver: • Apply Power, Measure Output at Relay Test 2 – Momentary Push Buttons: • Figure out Wiring Scheme Test 3 – Relays: • Apply 5V to Coil and use Ohmmeter to test the resistance between NO and the Com terminals

  20. …Testing and Modifications Test 4 – Garage Door Opener: • Power Opener and Determine Terminal Functionality Test 5 – Light Detection Circuit: • Build Circuit from Schematic and test with a flashlight to see if the Voltage Signal disappears when incandescent light is visible. Test 6 – Contact Limit Switch: • Wire a series circuit and make sure the NO circuit changes to closed the the contact is closed. Test 7 – Micro-Controller: • Download the program to the hardware, send in input signals with a source to different pins and check the output for a signal.

  21. Other Significant Project Activities • Relay Discussions with Jason Boyd • Reporting and Necessary Documentation

  22. Personnel Effort Budget

  23. Other Required Resources

  24. Financial Budget

  25. Schedules – Original Estimate

  26. Schedules - Actual

  27. Project Evaluation Milestones: • Problem Definition (Fully Met) • Research (Fully Met) • Technology Selection (Fully Met) • Finalize Physical Design Plan (Fully Met) • Acquire All Parts (Fully Met) • Implementation of SGDS (Fully Met) • Testing and Revisions (Fully Met) • Documentation (Fully Met)

  28. Commercialization • Capable of being fully commercialized • Useable on most garage doors • Adaptable • Design at different consumers • Offer unique enhancements • Current Production Cost • $100.82 • Current Street Selling Price • Set at $300 • Cost Savers / Overhead Reduction • Custom Design Components • Ex. Receiver / Transmitter

  29. Recommendation for Additional Work • Design Transmitter/Receiver • Design for Commercial Use • Design for more than two garage doors • Design for non-rail-type systems • Security System Integration

  30. Lessons Learned • No Delays • Well Defined Project Specifications • Communication • Time Management Skills • Resource Utilization

  31. Risks and Risk Management • Loss of a group member • Parts are not available • Accidental damage to parts • Too many team donations

  32. Closing Summary General Problem • Auto-Closing Garage Door System • Convenience for homeowner • Home security Approaches Considered • Building a Transmitter/Receiver from scratch vs. Buying a Fabricated Unit • Building a “Hard-Wired” Logic Circuit vs. Signal Processing • Different Types of Sensors for Input • Pressure Pad for Tire • Contact Switch • Light Sensor • Using Openers with Exterior Contacts vs. Determining the Internal Circuitry

  33. Closing Summary – continued Resultant Solution • Purchased a Transmitter/Receiver • Used Signal Processing • Motorola HC11 • Power Relays • Types of Sensors used • Contact Limit Switch • Light Sensor • Used Opener with Exterior Contacts

  34. Summary Technologies Role • Societies Dependence • Human Error • Need of Smart Garage Door System • Revolutionary • Utilization of Sensory Input • Interprets User’s Needs • Offers Homeowners Peace of Mind

  35. Questions?

More Related