1 / 44

Dr Gerald Craddock Centre for Excellence in Universal Design (CEUD)

Dr Gerald Craddock Centre for Excellence in Universal Design (CEUD) National Disability Authority (NDA) Dublin Ireland www.universaldesign.ie University of Pittsburgh Accessibility in the Context of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Télécharger la présentation

Dr Gerald Craddock Centre for Excellence in Universal Design (CEUD)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dr Gerald Craddock Centre for Excellence in Universal Design (CEUD) National Disability Authority (NDA) Dublin Ireland www.universaldesign.ie University of Pittsburgh Accessibility in the Context of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Transatlantic Perspective June 12-13 2009

  2. "Measuring Progress of eAccessibility in Europe" (known as the 'MeAC' study). The study commissioned by the European Commission in 2006 as a follow-up to the eAccessibility Communication of 2005 The aim To provide an evidence-base to support the future development of EU policy in the eAccessibility field. The full report including annexes is available at: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/einclusion/index_en.htm

  3. MeAC Reports 07,08 Major data gathering programme was implemented to compile the necessary information for this purpose, including: ·1) survey of the policy situation in relation to eAccessibility in each of the Member States and in selected comparison countries (Australia, Canada, United States) ·2)measurement of the status of eAccessibility in each of these countries on a common set of selected key Indicators ·3) surveys of key stakeholders (ICT industry, user organisations, and public procurement officials). Dataset the largest and most representative information on the eAccessibility field in Europe and internationally that has been available anywhere in the world to date–Benchmarking eAccessibility!!!!!!

  4. The spectrum of relevant ICT technologies and services MeAC Report Nov 08

  5. MeAC Report • Results not good: Surprise!!!! • eAccessibility “Deficit” • eAccessibility “Gap” • eAccessibility “Patchwork”

  6. Image courtesy: Raph de Rooij - web interface quality specialist, www.webguidelines.nl

  7. Examples of Deficit in Europe on eAccessibility • ·Text relay services (essential for deaf and speech impaired people) are only available in one-half of the Member States; emergency services are directly accessible by text telephone in only seven Member States • ·Mobile operators in only seven Member States provide dedicated information for customers with disabilities on their websites • ·On average, less than one-third of national language broadcasts of main public broadcasters in Europe were provided with subtitling (for deaf people) in 2006; there is wide variability (from 95% to none) in the amount of subtitling across individual countries • ·key government web sites in the Member States meet the accepted minimum international standards on accessibility (12,5% passed automated testing and only 5,3% passed both automatic and manual examination) • key commercial/sectoral web sites (e.g. railways, TV, newspapers, retail banking) providing this minimum level of accessibility is even lower (only 3,9% passed automated testing while not a single site passed both automatic and manual testing)

  8. Implementation “GAP” – Europe - CA, Aus, USA

  9. The Policy “GAP” – Between Europe and Canada, USA and Australia

  10. Pathwork across all Countries – White Spaces = No Implementation/Policy

  11. Ireland policy Progress of eAccessibility in Ireland Policy and Implemtation Impact Ireland

  12. Overall eAccessibility Policy Scores

  13. Ireland Score Overall eAccessibility Policy Scores

  14. The eAccessibility Implementation 'Gap' Ireland

  15. Why Ireland????

  16. BC

  17. Strategy For Equality 95 • People with Disabilities came up with 402 Recommendations:- All Sectors • Key: Disability Defined within a Social Model • Legislation introduced would be “rights based” • Independent Assessment of Need

  18. Equality Legislation • The Employment Equality Act 1998 • National Disability Authority Act 1999 • The Equal Status Act 2000 • The Equality Act 2004 • The Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act 2004 • The Citizens Information Act 2004. • The Disability Act 2005 • The Citzens Information Act 2006 -Advocacy

  19. Equality ActsLegislation • Illegal to discriminate against worker or job applicant with disability • Discrimination is in context of worker being able to do core job • Employer must reasonably accommodate disability – if cost not disproportionate • Premises serving the public must be accessible – if cost of doing so is nominal

  20. Equality -Infastructure • Equality Authority 99 • Equality Tribunal 99 • National Disability Authority 2000 • National Council for Special Education 05

  21. National Disability Strategy 06-16sets the Agenda for Change • Disability Act 05 • Education of Persons with Special Needs Act 06 • 6 Sectoral Plans • Multi-annual funding for high support needs • Citizen Information Bill re advocacy • Equality Acts as foundation • Overseen by interdepartmental Senior Officials Group chaired by D/Taoiseach -Champion • Cabinet Committee on Social Inclusion

  22. Six Sectoral PlansGovernment Departments • Dept of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, - Comreg (Communications Regulator), • BCI (Broadcasting Commission of Ireland) • Dept of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, • BRAB – Building Regulations Advisory Board • Dept of Transport. • (National Transport Authority) • Dept of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, • Dept of Health and Children, • Dept of Social and Family Affairs,

  23. Accessible public servicesPart 3 Disability Act Public bodies must • Ensure people with disabilities can use mainstream public services • Provide information in ways that suit the needs of people with disabilities (e.g. large print, Easy to Read) • Buy in accessible goods and services • By 2015, have accessible premises • All “where practicable and appropriate” • NDA Code of Practice on services, information, procurement Gov/Public Bodies Only – Regulatory Instrument

  24. UN Convention – Art. 9 Accessible premises, information Access to private sector public venues Co. of Europe Barrier-free built environment Universal Design Nat. Disability Strategy Public service obligations for accessible services, premises, information, public procurement Accessibility programme by local authorities under Environment Sectoral Plan Accessibility

  25. UN Convention Art. 4 to promote universal design in the development of standards and guidelines Co of Europe 6 Guidelines, standards, training of professions Disability Act 2005 Centre of Excellence in Universal Design Develop and promote standards Education of design professions Work with professional bodies Universal Design

  26. Correlation between national level accessibility-related policies and achieved accessibility (EU25, USA, CA, AU)

  27. Centre for Excellence in Universal Design CEUDIT Guidelines 5 technology areas Web Public access terminals Application Software Telecoms Smart Card Systems

  28. IT Procurement Toolkit • Practical advice on procurement: • Writing an Request for Tender document (RFT) • Assessing candidates and tenders • Evaluating deliverables • eg – sample text to insert into RFT

  29. Digital Accessibility Toolkit for Policy Makers(G3ICT)

  30. Standards Past: Standards = minimum requirements Today: Standards = support & catalyst for Innovation

  31. Innovation and standards development • European Commission paper – “Towards an increased contribution from standardisation to innovation in Europe” • Stronger role for standardisation in support of innovation Enables Europe to address economic, environment & social challenges. • Can be a tool to disseminate new knowledge innovation and technology EU Mandates 376 and 420 – Phases 1 completed by CEN – testing & Comformance ETSI – Human Factors

  32. Defining Innovation “Something new that will be adopted by customers” Michael Schrage (MIT)

  33. Main Reason for non-adoption Failure to fully understand customer needs

  34. Universal Designcurriculum for Continious Professional Development(CPD) European Committee for Standardization (CEN) provides a platform for the development of European Standards and other technical specifications. A CEN Workshop Agreement is a consensus-based specification, drawn up in an open Workshop environment. goal to specify and recommend a curriculum for training IT and web professionals in how to apply a Universal Design approach. Launch 27 May, 2009 Brussels

  35. Solution??? eAccessibility is more than a technical Solution!!! Image courtesy: Raph de Rooij - web interface quality specialist, www.webguidelines.nl

  36. Going Forward • Increase Collaboration Transatlantic • Regulation/Directives/Standards • ITU, UN globally • New Champions • Education – integrated into Courses at all Levels • Universal Design – Not as a Marketing tool but as a Process that Includes all and is Good Design – brings more people to the party – older people, gender, eithnic minorities etc

  37. 10th  International  Conference  of  the  Association  for  the  Advancement  of  Assistive  Technology  in  Europe  (AAATE)   Inclusion  between  past  and  future  ‐ AT  from  adapted  equipment  to  inclusive  environments   August  31  –  September  2,  2009,  Florence,  Italy   • : • The contribution of Assistive Technology and Design for All towards inclusion; • The need for standardization (formal, informal and de facto); • Cultural aspects: e.g. acceptance of different approaches, designs and aesthetics of AT devices and inclusive living environments • Social aspects: penetration of AT and integrated approaches, the role of Europe in building up inclusion competence in emerging and developing countries, etc.;

  38. “The difference principle” Institutions to be structured with a built-in bias in favour of the disadvantaged (Rawls, 1971)

  39. As international communication and travel increase, it will become increasingly difficult to justify national or regional differences in accessibility criteria ... the marketplace is demanding accessibility at a rate that is outstripping accessibility standards. John P.S. Salmen, Universal Designers and Consultants

More Related