html5-img
1 / 8

SAT Referral Process

SAT Referral Process. 08/12/14. Multi-Tiered Academic Interventions (Burns, Jimerson , & Deno, 2007). Tier I : Universal screening and progress monitoring: All students, Tier II: Standardized interventions delivered in an efficient manner (small groups) : 15% to 20% of students at any time

chibale
Télécharger la présentation

SAT Referral Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SAT Referral Process 08/12/14

  2. Multi-Tiered Academic Interventions (Burns, Jimerson, & Deno, 2007) Tier I: Universal screening and progress monitoring: All students, Tier II: Standardized interventions delivered in an efficient manner (small groups) : 15% to 20% of students at any time Tier III: Individualized interventions developed through in-depth problem analysis: 5% of students at any time

  3. Process Main Points • Three main roles (System Manager, Facilitator, and Consultant) • Consultation before and after meeting • Use a consistent form

  4. Team Members • Referring teacher • Another general education teacher • Special education teacher • School psychologist • Others as needed (another teacher, Title I teacher, SLP, counselor, social worker, nurse, etc.) • Principal?

  5. Team Roles • Number of members • 5 – 8 (Rosenfield, 1996) • 7 or fewer (Zins, 1988) • Systems Manager - Organizes meeting & monitors status • Problem-solving Facilitator • Consultant

  6. Consultation • Within 2 to 5 days of referral • Behaviorally define problem • Prioritize • Observe kid/baseline data • Conduct meeting within 2 weeks • 10 to 15 minutes • Meet within 2 weeks of conference • discuss the teacher’s understanding • assess implementation integrity • problem solve previously unforeseen difficulties with the intervention

  7. Grade-Level Team Meeting - Progress • Who is making sufficient progress? • Should we discontinue and write a transition plan? • Who is not making sufficient progress? • Should we make a change within the tier? • Should we change tiers? • Is there anyone new that we should talk about?

  8. Tier 2 Problem Solving • Check student’s attendance – Does the student attend school regularly • Observe the student – Are behavioral difficulties interfering with the interventions? • Incentivize the intervention – Is the student sufficiently motivated? • Examine intervention fidelity – Is the intervention occurring as it should? • Compare skill and GOM data – Are students not generalizing (skill data are going up but GOM are not) • Examine the accuracy within skill and GOM data – Are the students receiving a proficiency intervention when they should be focusing on acquisition?

More Related