1 / 20

How Regional is Regional Environmental Governance?

How Regional is Regional Environmental Governance?. Comparing Regional Environmental Governance in East Asia and Europe EE-REG Kyoto 24-25th January 2013 Prof Juliet J. Fall. Two questions. What is a region , and how is/are they made?

chiko
Télécharger la présentation

How Regional is Regional Environmental Governance?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. How Regional is Regional Environmental Governance? Comparing Regional Environmental Governance in East Asia and Europe EE-REG Kyoto 24-25th January 2013 Prof Juliet J. Fall

  2. Two questions • What is a region, and how is/are they made? • What ‘environment’ are we talking about when we talk about regional environmental governance?

  3. 1. If we are talking about framing regional environmental governance, then… What is a region?

  4. Regionalisation?

  5. Ex.: How was the Carpathian Convention built around a naturalgeographical object? • Defining the boundaries to the Carpathians was a contested political process. • Ex.: 120 page report to decide boundaries (2006) • National Definitions • UE, UNEP, WWF definitions of ‘mountains’ etc. • Should Serbia / Montenegro be part of it? Where should the Secretariat be located? Who should fund it? Fall, J.J. & Egerer, H., 2004, Constructing the Carpathians: the Carpathian Convention and the search for a spatial ideal, Revue de Géographie Alpine / Journal of Alpine Research, 92 (2), 98-106.

  6. How do we construct regions? Beyond the state… 1. Natural regions 2. Supranational organisations 3. Decentralized affiliates of global organizations 4. Social configurations 5. Hybrid entities http://www.welt-atlas.de/map_of_asia_map_of_the_world_political_0-9023

  7. Research projects • Following regionalization processes in the Carpathians, the Balkans, the Danube Strategy, and local (bottom-up) initiatives, and comparing them to the Alpine experiences. • Analysing the identification of natural entities (mountains, river basins, bioregions, etc.) in projects, international cooperation designs and data processing B. Debarbieux D. Djordjevic Gilles Rudaz Raphael Pieroni Isabelle Mauz Simon Gaberell Joerg Balsiger Juliet Fall C. Del Biaggio

  8. Living with a flexible definition • “Region” and “regionalization” refer to spatial entities that are constructed at particular levels (i.e. subnational, supranational or transnational) • The question is how are such regions framed (“how are they constructed”, and by whom) >>> literature on the politics of scale; on New Regional Geography; and Political ecology

  9. Glo-Rete: example The Carpathians from environmental data to institution building

  10. 2. If we are regionalisation environmental governance, then do we all agree that we know… What environments are we talking about?

  11. Cultiver son jardin ? Environmental issues require thinking beyond clearly contained political spaces … but how can we rethink such multi-level and flexible regional environmental governance?

  12. Transgressions

  13. Nature without boundaries?

  14. Diversity of science and culture Example: Transboundary protected area between Germany and France, well-established Interreg projects between two European Union countries: “It is not easy to agree what the natural vegetation is here”(‘Kathrin’, park manager in Pfälzerwald, Germany, interview with J. Fall, 2002) • Different scientific opinions about what the climactic forest vegetation is in the Pfälzerwald/ Vosges du nord, • Different cultural conceptions of what is worth conserving. Fall, J.J. 2005. Drawing the Line: Nature, Hybridity and Politics in Transboundary Spaces, Border Regions Series, Ashgate, Abingdon

  15. Diversity of nature(s) ‘Nature’ for l’UNESCO ‘Nature’ for biologists ‘Nature’ for foresters ‘Nature’ for local officials ‘Nature’ for Ministry Environment Natures ? ‘Nature’ for French ‘Nature’ for Germans ‘Nature’ for ecologists ‘Nature’ for local people

  16. 3. If we are talking about governance working across scales and regions, then… Where do we go from now?

  17. For example… Past trends, and potential future developments of geographical specificities for territorial policy and regional development. Comparable and reliable indicators and indices that can be used to measure territorial cohesion, complex territorial development, structural issues, territorial challenges and opportunities

  18. Thank you for your attention,and greetings from the whole team for the success of the meeting! B. Debarbieux D. Djordjevic Gilles Rudaz Raphael Pieroni Isabelle Mauz Simon Gaberell Joerg Balsiger Juliet Fall C. Del Biaggio

More Related