1 / 22

What is “Good Science”?

What is “Good Science”?. Science is a process by which we try to understand how the natural and physical world works and how it came to be that way. What is science?. Science is a human endeavor. Scientists are all human, with the typical faults that non-scientists have.

Télécharger la présentation

What is “Good Science”?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What is “Good Science”?

  2. Science is a process by which we try to understand how the natural and physical world works and how it came to be that way. What is science?

  3. Science is a human endeavor. • Scientists are all human, with the typical faults that non-scientists have. • Therefore science has “quality control measures” to increase its reliability. • Good science is objective • Unbiased (Objective): not influenced by feelings, interests and prejudices • Biased (Subjective): influenced by feelings, interests & prejudices.

  4. Science follows certain rules & guidelines. • Exactly “what” these rules and guidelines are depends on what area of science a specific scientific is in. • The scientific method (i.e. hypotheses are formulated from observations, and theories develop from these hypotheses) can be used • Science is not so simply organized all the time.

  5. Facts versus opinions. • An important distinction to make clear when science is an issue is the difference between fact and opinion. • "Fact" in a scientific context is a generally accepted reality (but still open to scientific inquiry, as opposed to an absolute truth). • Hypotheses and theories are generally based on objective inferences, unlike • Opinions, which are generally based on subjective influences

  6. Science generally uses the formulation of falsifiable hypotheses • Hypotheses that cannot ever be disproven are not real science. • Explanations based on supernatural forces, values, or ethics can never be disproved and thus do not fall under the realm of science • Note: it does not say these things are unimportant, just not in the realm of science • Many scientists “say” that a hypothesis cannot ever be proven, only disproven.

  7. HYPOTHESIS—proposed, testable explanation for the way “something” functions. The “educated guess”

  8. Acceptance of scientific ideas is based on a process of publication and peer review. • To become a legitimate theory a hypothesis must be subjected to the approval of a scientist's peers and published in an accredited scientific journal. • Theories tend to persist until a better theory is proposed and gains broad acceptance, rather than new theories being proposed for every tiny fact that is deduced.

  9. THEORY—highly tested, generally accepted principal that explains a vast number of observations and experimental data • The “most sure” we get in science • Common use of the word theory is very different from the actual scientific definition. Example—“it’s just a theory who murdered the girl”

  10. Replication is also vital to good science • For the scientific community to accept a finding, other investigators must be able to duplicate the original investigator's findings. • Thus, you cannot make up your data; other scientists must be able to follow the same methods you used (whether experimentation, mathematical calculations, formulating major concepts, measuring data, or whatever) and come up with the same results.

  11. Knowledge of what science is, what it can and cannot do and how it works is important for all people • True or False? • People need to be able to evaluate scientific information in order to make informed decisions about • Health care • Environmental issues • Technological advances • Public health issues

  12. OBSERVATION—act of gathering information firsthand using your five senses Be careful not to confuse an observation with an inference • INFERENCE—a conclusion that results from past observations or knowledge. • You need observations in order to make inferences. • You’ll use inferences when you draw conclusions about what has happened.

  13. OBSERVATION • ___________________ • ___________________ • ___________________ • The owl has wings • Both of the owls eyes face forward • It is night INFERENCE • Owls live in trees • Owls feed on mice • Owls kill prey with their talons • ___________________ • ___________________ • ___________________

  14. Data When scientists look at DATA they… • Determine if it is reliable • Look to see if it supports or does not support the hypothesis • Determine possible sources of error • Usually shown in graph or table form • Scientists analyze tables, graphs and charts to draw conclusions about whether the hypothesis is supported or not supported.

  15. Data Sources • University Research • Corporate Research • Government Research • Research by Special Interest Groups All organizations produce unbiased data. However, it is important to understand the organization’s motivation to be able to identify potential bias. In some situations, the need to promote special interests or make profits may lead to bias.

  16. When gathering data you could “introduce a bias… • A prejudiced presentation of material • A consistent error in estimating a value • Two types of bias • Sampling Bias • Measurement Bias

  17. Good science depends on a well-designed experiment that minimizes bias by using the appropriate: • Sample size • Sample selection • Measurement techniques • ***for the question being investigated

  18. Examining the Data Source Investigations of Passive Smoking Harm: Relationship between Article Conclusions & Author Affiliations Barnes, Deborah E. 1998. Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA. 279(19): 1566-1570.

More Related