1 / 33

Logistics Health Assessment (LHA)

Air Force Materiel Command. Logistics Health Assessment (LHA). Terry Brinston AAC/ENQL 18 Mar 08. Integrity  Service  Excellence. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A : Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Purpose.

cicada
Télécharger la présentation

Logistics Health Assessment (LHA)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Air Force Materiel Command Logistics Health Assessment(LHA) Terry Brinston AAC/ENQL 18 Mar 08 Integrity  Service  Excellence DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

  2. Purpose To inform you of the effort to develop and deploy a standard, tailorable, measurable, and user friendly logistics health assessment tool across the Command

  3. Problem Statements • No day-to-day standardized mechanism for assessing and measuring program office logistics planning and execution • Logistics module in SMART never fully developed • Lack of historical decision trail and associated impacts • PoPS is a top level program risk assessment tool • No drill down capability for specifics LHA FILLS THE VOID

  4. Overview • LHA • Attributes • Development • Methodology • Beta Tests • How Life Cycle Efforts Fit Together • LHA Integrated Master Schedule • Summary

  5. Attributes • Designed to complement NOT replace: • Acquisition & Sustainment Tool Kit, Independent Logistics Assessments (ILA), PoPS, etc • Horizontal and vertical integration • Integrates into a program office • Identifies trends across the Center’s portfolio • Shows connectivity to AFSO 21, e-Log 21, D&SWS, AFMC BSC, Bell Memo, etc. • Flexibility for program uniqueness – “Tailorable” • Applicable across the entire life cycle of a program • Standard work, repeatable, quantitative and aggregative • Documents metric trends • Uses existing information to maximum extent possible

  6. Development • LHA three phases • Phase I: Planning (Product Center Focus) • Deliverables • LHA Guidebook • Develop interim model - AAC Lead • Beta Testing • Phase II: Sustainment (ALC Focus) • Deliverables • WR-ALC hosted 1st RIE in Jan 08 • Next meeting scheduled for 3 Mar @ Eglin • Beta Testing (TBD) • Phase III: SMART Integration • Spiral 11, Incorporate LHA planning module (Spring/Summer 08) • Sustainment Module - TBD

  7. MethodologyPlanning Module • Assessment frequency – monthly or event triggered • Three top-level modules with sub-modules • Internal modules • Logistics Requirements and Strategy • Logistics Planning and Execution • External module • Logistics Support and Partnerships • System Engineering/Budget and Funding/Contracting/Program Transition • Modules are weighted based on integrated logistics elements -- the foundation to “design in support” • Numerical rating and RYG color code • All modules and sub-modules are rolled up in a single “windshield” chart • Trend information displayed

  8. Beta Tests • Completed Beta Testing Oct 07 • P5 Combat Training Systems, C-32 CLS Program, B-1 Radar Modernization Program, Joint Environmental Toolkit (JET) • Beta Test results (Product Centers) • Issue: Scoring generated misleading results (elements green / roll up yellow) • Resolution: Revised scoring process • Issue: Request LHA criteria be embedded into tool as opposed to separate guidebook • Resolution: LHA Tool revised to show criteria and scoring • Issue: JET comments from ESC • Resolution: Ensure adequate training is available to program office

  9. Customer Comments • LHA addressed all the supportability/sustainment areas required in a program office to determine the overall logistics health of a program • Thanks for the opportunity to provide input into the process • Like the idea LHA will feed SMART and Sufficiency Reviews • Satisfies requirement for more than one briefing/status/forum • The LHA addressed all the supportability/sustainment areas that would normally be required in a program office to determine the overall logistics health of a program • The scoring criteria (R/Y/G) - easy to follow and provided enough detail to adequately grade the areas being assessed • The LHA Guidebook provided assessment criteria, references, and quick links to perform a complete evaluation of the logistics health assessment of the program

  10. LHA - SMART Integration • Automated LHA (planning), Summer 08 • SMART integration scheduled • Fills logistics reporting gap • Quick on-line assessment of logistics health • PEO Reporting Template • Populates PEO Supportability Assessment Quad charts • Reports/output from LHA • Criteria consistent with PoPs, Unit Compliance Inspection, ILA, A&S Tool Kit etc.

  11. LHA Version 2.1 Main MenuActive Program

  12. LHA Program Issue, Impact, & Mitigation Statement Data Entry Form

  13. LHA Windshield ReportActive Program

  14. LHA Program Supportability Quad ChartActive Program

  15. AFSO 21 Develop & Sustain Warfighting Systems HQ AFMC/A4A Initiatives *HQ AFMC Balanced Score Card (BSC) D&SWS Life Cycle Management Sub-Processes Acquisition & Sustainment Tool Kit Define & Apply High Confidence Criteria To AF Portfolio Independent Logistics Assessments Strengthen Fielding Process Logistics Health Assessments Institutionalize Time Certain Capabilities PEO Supportability Assessments Life Cycle Affordability - LCM-1-09 Life Cycle Management Plans Policy Program Transition Guidance AF Level AFMC How Life Cycle Efforts Fit Together *Under Revision Life Cycle Management (LCM) – (TBD)

  16. Summary • Accomplishments • Planning Module • LHA Guide Book • Beta Testing • OUSD/ATL Lifecycle Sustainment Enablers • Embedded in LHA criteria • Way Ahead • Logistics Health Assessment Planning module within SMART • Standardize metrics • Sustainment Module • Incorporate into SMART (Summer 08) • PEO Supportability reviews to utilize automated LHA data Provides Senior Leaders with a site picture of a program’s logistics health at any point in the system life cycle

  17. BACKUP

  18. Logistics Health Assessment Modules/Points • Module 3: Logistics Support & Partnerships (20) • System Engineering (5) • Contracting (5) • Budget/Funding (5) • Program Transition (5) • Module 1: Logistics Requirements & Strategy Planning Module (30) • Requirements (10) • Product Support Strategy (15) • IMP/IMS (5) • Module 2: Logistics Planning & Execution Planning Module (50) • Manpower & Personnel (5) • Maintenance Planning (5) • Support Equipment (5) • Training & Training Support • Supply Support • Facilities • Technical Data • Computer Resources Support (5) • PHS&T (5) • Design Interface (5) Since the LHA references the A&S Tool Kit and ILA to assesses logistics critical product support elements are addressed throughout the program! Bottom-line: Better support for the Warfighter at a lower total cost of ownership Logistics

  19. Logistics Health Assessment Modules/Points • Module 2: Logistics Planning & Execution Planning Module (50) • Manpower & Personnel (5) • Maintenance Planning (5) • Support Equipment (5) • Training & Training Support • Supply Support • Facilities • Technical Data • Computer Resources Support (5) • PHS&T (5) • Design Interface (5) • Module 1: Logistics Requirements & Strategy Planning Module (30) • Requirements (10) • Product Support Strategy (15) • IMP/IMS (5) • Module 3: Logistics Support & Partnerships (20) • System Engineering (5) • Contracting (5) • Budget/Funding (5) • Program Transition (5)

  20. LHA Rating FormActive Program

  21. Logistics Mitigation Plan (LMP) • Explain (in narrative) the mitigation strategy or “get well” plan for any LHA rating below 80 (Address both the module(s) and sub-module(s) contributing to any rating below 80). Accomplishment of an LMP is required with the accomplishment of any LHA. • Logistics Requirements & Strategy • Logistics Planning & Execution • Logistics Support & Partnerships • This information should be archived in SMART for the duration of the program in accordance with objectives of the LHA to record historical documentation of logistics decisions across the Program’s acquisition life cycle.

  22. Planning Module (Program Initiation) Sustainment Module Coming Soon! C A B Concept Refinement Technology Development System Development & Demonstration Production & Deployment Operations & Support Design Readiness Review FRP Decision Review Concept Decision LRIP/IOT&E Systems Acquisition Sustainment Pre-Systems Acquisition Life Cycle LHA

  23. LHA WindshieldPlanning Module

  24. LHA Integrated Master Schedule

  25. Life Cycle LHASustainment Domain • Kick off 28 - 30 Jan 08 @ WR-ALC • Purpose: assess efficacy of applying LHA tool in the Sustainment domain • Attendees: • OC-ALC - Capt Franklin Shifflett 540 ACSS/DO, Mr. Samuel Champlin OC-ALC/XPR • OO-ALC - Ms. Lynda Lowin 503 ACSS/DD, Ms. Judy Bell OO-ALC/XPO • AAC - Ms. Terry Brinston AAC/EN, Ms. Elizabeth Jones & Mr. Danny Bridges AAC/ENL • SMC - Mr. Ian Martin SLG/XP • ASC - Ms. Charleen Carlson ASC/AEL • WR-ALC - Mr. Kenny Dees WR-ALC/XPXP, Mr. Greg Lewis WR-ALC/XPX • HQ AFMC - Mr. Robert Eardley AFMC/A4W, Ms. Merry Wermund AFMC/A4SM • Next meeting is scheduled for 3 – 7 Mar 08

  26. Systems Engineering Assessments Technology/Manufacturing Readiness Assessments Probability of Program Success (POPS) Assessments BackgroundAAC Acquisition Tools and Processes Balanced Scorecard Measures Sufficiency Reviews Cost Estimate Sufficiency Reviews High Quality Requirements Stable Funding Profile Robust Life Cycle Program Planning Proactive Risk Management Personnel Stability Risk-Based Source Selections Accounting for Realism Appropriate Technical Maturity Positive Teaming Relationships Early PEO Engagement For Systemic Issues Best Practices

  27. MS A MS B TRIA/ MRA TRIA/ MRA CSR CSR SEA SEA PoPS PoPS SR SR AAC Assessment Life Cycle POM Input MS C Sustainment MRA/ TRIA MRA/ TRIA (As Required) TRIA CSR CSR CSR (As Required) SEA SEA Updated Quarterly PoPS PoPS PoPS Assessed Monthly SR SR SR (As Required)

  28. INPUTS (FROM STD AAC PRODUCTS) Spiral 2 (In work) Spiral 1 Assessment Engine(Milestones A-C) Logistics Health Assessment (LHA) Technology Readiness & Integration Assessment (TRA) Systems Engineering Assessment (SEA) Probability of Program Success (PoPS) Sufficiency Review (SR) Probability of Program Success (PoPS) Manufacturing Readiness Assessment (MRA) Cost Sufficiency Review (CSR)

  29. PoPS - AFMC BSC I2, Strengthen acquisition capability M1, Deliver weapons systems M2, Modify weapons systems Strategy to Task Key Enablers • Independent Logistics Assessment • Acquisition & Sustainment Process Tool Kit • Program Supportability Assessment • OSD Life Cycle Sustainment e-Log 21 • Increase 20% availability at 10% reduced cost and reduced cycle time D&SWS Life Cycle Affordability • Objectives TBD CAMS • Aircraft availability • Cost Per Flying Hour • Financial Execution for Sustainment AFSO 21 • CPI • Eliminate Waste • Reduce Cost • Develop Airmen LHA – AFMC BSC • I4, Improve equipment availability at reduced cost • I8, Strengthening fielding • M3, Sustain weapons systems

  30. Where We’ve Been • Apr 07, Rapid Improvement Event (RIE) • ASC, ESC, AFMC/A4A, AAC, SAF/AQ Rep • Consensus on the Way Ahead • Jun 07 RIE • Reviewed initial draft of LHA • Defined interrelationships with existing tools • Jul 07 RIE • Refine LHA guide • Complete interrelationships • Linkage to strategic objectives

  31. Interrelationships

More Related