1 / 34

Red Hook Initiative Education 225X

Red Hook Initiative Education 225X. Jason Medeiros, Anthony Schloss, Paul Franz, Amanda Edwards. Agenda. RHI Background Project Objective and Methods Findings Recommendations Questions/Comments. RHI: Background. Founded 2002 Located in the Red Hook, Brooklyn

ciro
Télécharger la présentation

Red Hook Initiative Education 225X

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Red Hook Initiative Education 225X Jason Medeiros, Anthony Schloss, Paul Franz, Amanda Edwards

  2. Agenda • RHI Background • Project Objective and Methods • Findings • Recommendations • Questions/Comments

  3. RHI: Background • Founded 2002 • Located in the Red Hook, Brooklyn • Serves residents of Red Hook Houses • 10,000 residents • 3500 are under age 19 • High levels of gang activity, drugs, school drop-out rates • Service model based on idea that change comes from within the community • Serves 2500 people annually

  4. Points of Differentiation • 55 Red Hook Houses residents employed by RHI • RHI pays >$250,000 per year back into Red Hook • Significant portion of funds directly impact Red Hook residents • Comprehensive approach to community development

  5. Education 4-Pillars Model After-school programs, advocacy within school, reenrolling in school, college application assistance Job readiness training, resume and interview help, entrepreneurial experience for youth, one-on-one career counseling Employment CommunityDevelopment Health Engage adults from the neighborhood: Promote positive change and communication Educate about healthy behaviors, assist with insurance and doctor visits, peer education programs

  6. Capital Campaign: Phase 1 • Expanded services • Central location • Increased impact

  7. Project Objectives • Frame 2nd phase of capital campaign • Objective 1: Create strategy for attracting new donors from adjacent neighborhoods • Objective 2: Create strategy to increase per capita giving from current donors

  8. Methodology • Market Segmentation • Literature Review • Analysis of competitors • Online Survey • Interviews

  9. Market Segmentation Objective 1 • Key elements of segmentation • Household income level • Educated population • Current low level of engagement with Red Hook • Shared values with RHI mission Carroll Gardens, Cobble Hill, Park Slope

  10. Literature Review: Findings • 5 factors that drive donor commitment • Perceived service quality • Shared beliefs • Perceived risk • Existence of personal link to cause • Trust Basis for survey structure

  11. Literature Review: Findings • The easier a non-profit makes the decision to give, the more likely donors are to give • Contributing to non-profits can become part of donor identity • Storytelling is an effective means to build donor identification with organization • Tiered-giving can motivate increased per capita spending

  12. Competitor analysis: Introduction • Spectrum of non-profit competition Collegial Combative Alternative

  13. Competitor analysis: Findings • Potential Competitors • National Organizations • United Way • Big Brothers and Big Sisters • YMCA • Local non-profits • Added Value • Dance Theatre Etc. • Red Hook Rise

  14. Competitor analysis: Findings National Organizations • Strengths • National Awareness • Perceived quality • Decision to give here is “easy” • Weaknesses • Underutilization of internet • Lack of personal connection to donors

  15. Competitor analysis: Findings Local Non-Profits • Strengths • Connections to other Brooklyn neighborhoods • Defined core competencies • Weaknesses • Only address one element of community development • Less direct focus on Red Hook Houses

  16. Survey and Interviews: Findings • Respondents prefer to give to local charities • Personal connection to mission is primary motivator • After-school programs are preferred RHI service supported by donors

  17. Survey and Interviews: Findings • Respondents prefer to give to local charities • Personal connection to mission is primary motivator • After-school programs are preferred RHI service supported by donors

  18. Organizations Preferred by Donors

  19. Survey and Interviews: Findings • Respondents prefer to give to local charities • Personal connection to mission is primary motivator • After-school programs are preferred RHI service supported by donors

  20. Motivation for Giving

  21. Survey and Interviews: Findings • Respondents prefer to give to local charities • Personal connection to mission is primary motivator • After-school programs are preferred RHI service supported by donors

  22. RHI Services Preferred by Donors

  23. Consumer Profiles: Process • Compiled survey results • Disaggregated data by age • Further disaggregated data by annual giving amount • Included qualitative information from interviews • Created composites of potential donors

  24. Consumer Profiles The New Young Giver The Affluent Analytic The Entrenched Brooklynite

  25. Consumer Profiles • The New Young Giver • 26-35 yrs old • Gives $0-$249 annually • Motivated by personal connection • Internet giver • Never been to Red Hook The New Young Giver The Affluent Analytic The Entrenched Brooklynite

  26. Consumer Profiles • The Affluent Analytic • 26-35 yrs old • Gives more than $249 annually • Motivated by mission of organization • Internet giver • Has visited Red Hook The New Young Giver The Affluent Analytic The Entrenched Brooklynite

  27. Consumer Profiles • The Entrenched Brooklynite • 36-50+ years old • Gives more than $250 annually • Motivated by type of work and effectiveness of organization • Method of giving varies • Committed to their specific neighborhood The New Young Giver The Affluent Analytic The Entrenched Brooklynite

  28. Recommendations 1 of 4 • Messaging • Put RHI’s Four Pillars front and center • Emphasize that donations stay in neighborhood • Share RHI success stories • Emphasize after-school programs

  29. Make 4 Pillars a Focal Point • Highlight RHI’s unique model • Emphasize the change created within the community BY the community • Elaborate on the comprehensiveness of the RHI approach • Shine a light on the things RHI does well that make it stand out from the competition

  30. After School Programs • RHI service with broadest appeal among donors • Similar to successful tactics used by United Way • Highlight these programs in campaign media • Increase visibility of positive youth activities • Showcase the skills & talents of Red Hook youth • Engage Red Hook youth in service outside of Red Hook

  31. Recommendations 2 of 4 • Implement tiered system of giving • Create circles or levels of giving which donors can join at certain donation levels • Research current levels of giving • Increase dollar amount of options for giving by an incremental amount

  32. Recommendations 3 of 4 • Maximize potential of the internet • Connect with Red Hook and Brooklyn blogs • Have partners’ websites include an RHI link • Use Quantcast.com or similar site to accurately profile website visitors

  33. Recommendations 4 of 4 • Host fundraiser on site • Utilize connections with supporters that are restaurants/bars • Bring people to Red Hook • Allow potential donors to see the new space • Create personal connections • Could be particularly effective for younger donors

  34. Questions

More Related