1 / 22

David Peterson National Research Council – Monterey, CA

Using the Autonomous Modular Sensor (AMS) to Validate Satellite-Retrieved Sub-Pixel Fire Area: Radiative Flux of Wildfires and Fire Weather. David Peterson National Research Council – Monterey, CA Edward Hyer , Naval Research Laboratory – Monterey

claude
Télécharger la présentation

David Peterson National Research Council – Monterey, CA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Using the Autonomous Modular Sensor (AMS) to Validate Satellite-Retrieved Sub-Pixel Fire Area: Radiative Flux of Wildfiresand Fire Weather David Peterson National Research Council – Monterey, CA Edward Hyer, Naval Research Laboratory – Monterey Jun Wang, University of Nebraska – Lincoln Charles Ichoku, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Vincent Ambrosia, NASA Ames Research Center Autonomous Modular Sensor Airborne Science Applications Use Workshop, 04/18/2013

  2. General Goal: Improve the Prediction of Smoke Emissions NRL’s FLAMBE Reid et al. (2009) Smoke Transport Modeling • Highlights of this Talk… • Sub-pixel-based calculation of fire intensity • AMS validation: general • AMS validation: background temperature • Short-term predictor of satellite fire activity http://alg.umbc.edu/usaq/images/

  3. Current MODIS Fire Radiative Power (FRPp) Advantages of FRPp over Standard Fire Counts • Quantitative indicator of fire intensity (Ichoku et al, 2008) • Proportional to amount of biomass consumed (Wooster et al., 2005) • Proportional to amount of smoke released (Ichoku and Kaufman, 2005) • Related to the smoke plume height (Val Martin et al., 2010) MODIS pixel-level FRPp(Kaufman et al., 1998) Current FRP Limitation (collection 5) FRP is currently derived over the pixel area These pixels have equal FRP? MODIS Pixel #1 MODIS Pixel #2 High fire temp. Small fire area Cooler fire temp. Large fire area Fit-line to many theoretical fire scenarios! Ap Ap We need FRP per fire area!

  4. Improved Sub-Pixel-Based Fire Radiative Power (FRPf) Based on retrieved fire area (Af) & temperature (Tf): Units: MW The flux of FRPf can also be calculated: Retrieval details are provided in: Peterson et al. & Peterson and Wang (2013), Remote Sens. Env. Units: Wm-2 FRP and Initial plume buoyancy, Kahn et al. (2007) & Val Martin et al. (2010) Sapkota et al. (2005) Af Tb Tf Is the smoke contained within the boundary layer? We need high-resolution validation data for fire area, temp., and FRP!

  5. NASA’s Ikhana • 4000 to 9000 AMS data points • per MODIS fire pixel! • AMS Pixel Resolution • Varies from 3 - 50 meters • Scan-to-scan differences • Topography • Flight Altitude varies • Limitations… • 4 µm channel saturates at ~510 K! • Can’t use for FRP validation! AMS fire area assessment algorithm developed by Peterson et al. (2013), Remote Sens. Env.

  6. Non-Fire Background Warmer than the MODIS Fire Pixel (11 µm)? MODIS Tb window: 8-21 valid pixels (Giglio et al., 2003) White = Tb error

  7. BackgroundTemperature Errors All 3 fire pixels with Tb > Tfire contain diffuse or pixel-edge hot spots! Cooler AMS fire temps… Peterson and Wang (2013), Remote Sens. Env.

  8. Background Temperature Investigation 2011 Texas Wildfires Day Error: 151 (26%) Night Error: 6 (2%)

  9. The In-Pixel Background Temperature MODIS vs. AMS Background Temperature (California, 2007) Error bars show the variability within the background region of a fire pixel Variation: 1-5 K Variation: 5-10 K Peterson and Wang (2013), Remote Sens. Env.

  10. Retrieval’s Sensitivity to Background Temperature Retrieved Fire Area (4 and 11 µm) Simulate potential errors in background temperature ΔTb = ± 5.0 K ΔTb = ± 1.0 K Small sensitivity to a large Tb error Large sensitivity to a small Tb error Incomplete error bars indicate Tb > Tpixel

  11. Fire Pixel Clustering Alleviates Random Error 2011 Texas Wildfires

  12. Fire Weather Application Choosing FRPf flux over fire counts? Ongoing fire growth/intensity inflow/circulation Do fire observations contain information to identify potential for high injection/blowups? How can we use weather information to make automated short-term forecasts of emissions for AQ models? How can we use weather information to improve smoke emission estimates in near-real-time and retrospectively? NARR Domain (~32 km)

  13. Toward Developing a Short-Term Predictor of Fire Activity MODIS Alaska Observed (Day 2/Day 1) Growth Decay Peterson et al. (2013) Atmospheric Environment Small symbols: < 10 fire counts on day 1

  14. Toward Developing a Short-Term Predictor of Fire Activity RMSE statistics for the fire count prediction model compared to persistence… • Highlights • Fire prediction model is an improvement over persistence. • Best with cases of decay/extinction! • Must overcome scan-to-scan variations! • Can also be applied to geostationary data. a Observed persistence is bounded by ±10 fire counts for MODIS. We need multiple AMS observations for the same fire event!

  15. Potential VIIRS Day-Night Band (DNB) Applications High Park Fire Fort Collins Greeley ~23 km x 23 km ~37 km x 37 km Loveland ASTER 8.3 µm image VIIRS DNB image Boulder Denver ~20 km VIIRS DNB image of the Denver / Front Range area T Images by: Tom Polivka, UNL ~37 km x 37 km ~37 km x 37 km VIIRS 4 µm image VIIRS 11 µm image

  16. Summary and Conclusions Value of AMS Data Collocated with a Satellite Overpass • Valuable validation tool for retrieved fire area, background temp., etc. • Non-saturated 4 µm data are required for fire temp and FRP validations! • Repeat looks are very useful for both applications and validation! Background Temperature • The AMS can identify reasons for errors in the MODIS background temp. • Important component of the sub-pixel retrieval's sensitivity analysis! Fire Weather and Changes in Smoke Emissions • A short-term predictor of fire counts has been developed, may also use FRPf • We need daily AMS observations from the same fire event! • Can we use the AMS before and after a significant change in meteorology? Future Goals • Retrieve FRPf flux using the next generation satellite sensors • Investigate potential applications using the VIIRS DNB • We need AMS collocations with VIIRS, especially at night! VIIRS

  17. david.peterson.ctr@nrlmry.navy.mil • Acknowledgements and Related Publications • National Research Council Postdoctoral Fellowship • NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship • Naval Research Enterprise Intern Program • NASA Nebraska Space Grant Thank You! Peterson, D., Wang, J., Ichoku, C., Hyer, E., & Ambrosia, V.: A sub-pixel-based calculation of fire radiative power from MODIS observations: 1. Algorithm development and initial assessment, Remote Sensing of Environment, 129, 262-279, 2013. Peterson, D., & Wang, J.: A sub-pixel-based calculation of fire radiative power from MODIS observations: 2. Sensitivity analysis and potential fire weather application, Remote Sensing of Environment,129, 231-249, 2013. Peterson, D.,Hyer, E., & Wang. J.: A short-term predictor of satellite-observed fire activity in the North American boreal forest: toward improving the prediction of smoke emissions, Atmospheric Environment, 71, 304-310, 2013.

  18. Tf& P Modified from Dozier (1981) Calculations per MODIS pixel: Pixel radiance = fire + background Bi-Spectral Retrieval: L4= τ4PB(λ4,Tf) + (1-P)L4b • L11= τ11PB(λ11,Tf) + (1-P)L11b • Where: • Tf = fire (kinetic) temperature • Lb= background radiance • P = fire area fraction • B(λ,Tf) = IR Planck Function • Τ = atmospheric transmittance • L = pixel radiance • Radiance (L) or Brightness Temperature? Lb 1 km2

  19. MODIS Sub-Pixel Retrieval Inputs • Geolocation data (solar/sensor zenith, azimuth) • Level 1B pixel radiances • Fire product background temperatures (4 and 11 µm) MODIS Pixel Overlap Correction and sub-pixel calculations (iterations) • Predefined Lookup Tables: • (4 and 11 µm) • SBDART Model • Atmospheric effects • Geometry • Surface temp. variations Clustering-Level Retrievals: Single Retrieval via Averages: One retrieval for all fire pixels corresponding to the cluster General Summation Method: All pixel-level fire area retrievals are summed Pixel-Level Retrievals: One output per pixel • Output: • Fire area fraction and retrieved fire area (Af, in km2) • Surface kinetic fire temperature (Tf) Calculation of Sub-Pixel-Based FRPf

  20. Autonomous Modular Sensor (AMS) Flight Path: 8/16/2007 • Instrument Details • Ambrosia & Wegener (2009) • Range: ~ 4000 miles • Flight altitude can vary • 12 spectral channels • Fires detected at 4 (3.75) and 11 (10.76) µm • Flight domain: western United States NASA’s Ikhana Zaca Fire Example

  21. Creating an AMS Fire Mask for Each MODIS pixel • Goals • Obtain actively burning fires • Remaining data are disregarded • Obtain background temperature • Challenges • Saturation at 4 µm (not at 11 µm) • Scan-to-scan variations • Diurnal effects • Approach • Calculate minimum thresholds • Two fire thresholds (4 and 11 µm) • Search for regions of low density within the histograms • Fire thresholds vary per MODIS pixel • Day/night algorithm • Consider variation of AMS and MODIS pixel size • Calculate AMS fire fraction AMS Data Within Several MODIS Pixels 4 µm AMS Data Within Several MODIS Pixels Fire Hot Spots Background Background 11 µm Smoldering or cooling Smoldering or cooling Saturation Problem Fire Hot Spots No Saturation

More Related