80 likes | 172 Vues
This initial meeting on 23 February 2006 covered goals, LHC@FNAL efforts, security, projects at Fermilab, and homework assignments for the SPS/CERN schedule. Participants discussed specific features needed for LHC@FNAL participation in SPS work this spring, with commitment to weekly meetings and assignments. The focus included delineating tasks, access requirements, and planning for future meetings.
E N D
SPS Team & LHC@FNAL: Initial Meeting Elliott McCrory 23 February 2006
Agenda for the meeting • Goals for this meeting • Elliott (5’) • Introduction to LHC@FNAL effort • Erik Gottschalk (30’), including most of the discussion • The current state of security at CERN w.r.t. FNAL • I did a demo of Terminal Services access into CERN • CERN Schedule • Discussion of LHC projects at Fermilab • SDA for LHC from Fermilab • Elliott (10’) • Others … • Homework assignments, next meetings …
Participants • Andreas Jansson • Vahid H. Ranjbar • Tanaji Sen • Cheng-yang Tan • Michael Lamm • Elvin Harms • Erik Gottschalk • And I. • Absent, but invited • Alvin V. Tollestrup • Susanne Gysin • Mike Syphers • Jean Slaughter
Some of the Things Presented • Summary • We are forming a group to delineate specific features required by LHC@FNAL, with an initial focus on participation in SPS work this spring. • Commitment • One meeting per week for four [or so] weeks, • Homework assignments. • SDA for LHC
The SPS/CERN Schedule http://psdata.web.cern.ch/psdata/ps-sched/2006/schedule2006.pdf
Homework Assigned • This week • What tasks can you imagine doing at LHC@FNAL • Outline form is OK • Focus now: SPS run this spring • May include: Sector Test next year. • Next weeks • Expand the task description • Including details of how it should be done • Turn these ideas into lists of specific access requirements • Next Meeting? • Default: Every Tuesday at 2PM • Through March • he Bungalow, henceforth • Room is held through April
Observations • Much about LHC@FNAL that these folks did not really know • EG: Educator! • All are interested in success of LHC@FNAL • Generally: Thought that a “Trusted Host” at Fermilab would be best