1 / 15

Module 8: Valuation Using the abnormal Enterprise Income growth Model

Module 8: Valuation Using the abnormal Enterprise Income growth Model. By jennifer kellner (Discount, Variety Stores Industry). Discount, Variety stores industry. Target Dollar General Wal-Mart Costco. *Costco is least comparable. Objective.

clay
Télécharger la présentation

Module 8: Valuation Using the abnormal Enterprise Income growth Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Module 8: Valuation Using the abnormal Enterprise Income growth Model By jenniferkellner (Discount, Variety Stores Industry)

  2. Discount, Variety stores industry Target Dollar General Wal-Mart Costco *Costco is least comparable

  3. Objective • To value the Firm (Target) using Abnormal Enterprise Income Growth Model, using: =

  4. steps • Discuss the abnormal income growth model • Recall relevant material • Sales growth, EPM & EATO assumptions • Valuation • Comparison (w/ FCF, REI) • Evaluate • Choosing a model • Uncertainties

  5. Step 1: Discuss the model Abnormal Enterprise Income Growth Model • AEIG model (mathematically) = FCF model & REI model • Should therefore obtain the same value, assuming steady-state is reached • Start: FCF model, substitute and introduce a zero sum equality to derive the model • Capitalizes EPAT + “the adjustment” • Unaffected by accounting choices (Depreciation, etc.) • Anchors on

  6. Abnormal income growth: what is it? Cum-free-cash flow earnings Theoretical expected earnings • The amount above (or below) what was “expected” in earnings • We expect income to grow at the required rate of return, which explains the latter half of the equation • The first part captures both EPAT and the earnings expected to accrue outside the firm • We “assume” the distribution is invested in something with equivalent risk

  7. Step 2: Recall • From prior modules: • EPAT & NEA were forecasted based on sales growth assumptions • Sales growth rates: • 2014 less due to data breach • Increase after w/ diminishing effect, expansion and Canadian sales • Perpetuity reflects eventual (diminishing) growth rate (but still growth*) Note: 2018 & 2019 forecasts added to horizon to reach steady-state

  8. Step 3: valuation Note (again): 2018 & 2019 added to reach the steady-state

  9. Step 4: compare • All models are mathematically equivalent, should yield = final value =

  10. … =

  11. Check: • The accounting models are all related • Specifically: AEIG = ΔREI

  12. Step 5: Choosing a model • Value captured by CV decreases moving towards the right (least certain information) • AEIG model captures most value within forecasted horizon (for which we have the greatest certainty)

  13. Evaluate • According to stockanalysis.net, EV = 52,299 (in millions) • 49.52 billion by Ychart.com • Stock price 2/21/14: $56.24 • Yahoo!Finance • According to valuation (using models), Target is “undervalued” • Is this accurate? Possibly. • Under a sensitivity analysis, buy/hold varies. • Source: http://www.stock-analysis-on.net/NYSE/Company/Target-Corp/Valuation/Enterprise-Value#Current-EV REI, FCF, AEIG Model Enterprise Value: 73,710 (in millions) Stock Price: 88.74

  14. uncertainties • Value is calculated based on estimates, data we forecasted • These are anticipated accounting numbers (Sales, EPAT, NEA) • To go back and refine • WACC takes into account many assumptions • Beta • Rmkt (used in CAPM) • *All of the above can change firm value dramatically

  15. Questions?

More Related