1 / 21

The Nature of Quality Improvement

The Nature of Quality Improvement. Donald M. Berwick, MD, MPP Institute for Healthcare Improvement Testimony to the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections Washington, DC: March 27, 2008. Aims. Safety Effectiveness Patient-centeredness Timeliness Efficiency Equity.

cleo-finch
Télécharger la présentation

The Nature of Quality Improvement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Nature of Quality Improvement Donald M. Berwick, MD, MPP Institute for Healthcare Improvement Testimony to the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections Washington, DC: March 27, 2008

  2. Aims • Safety • Effectiveness • Patient-centeredness • Timeliness • Efficiency • Equity

  3. IMPROVING SAFETY AT SCALE • 103 ICUs Working on Central Line Infections: • 82% Reduction in Mean Rate • 1,578 Lives Saved • 81,020 Hospital Days Saved • Over $165,000,000 in Costs Averted

  4. What are we trying to accomplish? How will we know that a change is an improvement? What changes can we make that will result in an improvement? Act Plan Study Do Model for Improvement(Nolan, et al.)

  5. Ascension Health Mortality Reduction

  6. 8,015 Donors in 2006 -- Another Recording Breaking Year! -- Collaborative Starts Here

  7. IHS Diabetes Care & Outcomes Audit Mean A1C, 1996-2007 A1C, % year Source: IHS National Diabetes Program Statistics 1996-2007 *p<0.0001 comparing mean A1C levels in FY96 and FY07

  8. Average visit cycle timePatient experience

  9. The “100,000 Lives Campaign”

  10. Preventing Central Line Infections • Hand hygiene • Maximal barrier precautions • Chlorhexidine skin antisepsis • Appropriate catheter site and administration system care • Daily review of line necessity and prompt removal of unnecessary lines

  11. Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABs)(from Rick Shannon, MD, West Penn Allegheny Health System)

  12. The Campaign “Planks” -- Six Changes That Save Lives • Deployment of Rapid Response Teams • Delivery of Reliable, Evidence-Based Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction • Medication Reconciliation • Prevention of Central Line Infections • Prevention of Surgical Site Infections • Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonias

  13. Six Additional Planks • Prevent Pressure Ulcers • Reduce Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Infection • Prevent Harm from High-Alert Medications • Reduce Surgical Complications (the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP)) • Deliver Reliable, Evidence-Based Care for Congestive Heart Failure • Get Boards on Board

  14. Rapid Response Results: Benedictine Hospital 43% Reduction

  15. “Informed Consent…” NOTICE TO OUR PATIENTS This hospital – our leaders, Board, and staff …. □does □does not make continual, informed changes in its processes of care, based on current and new science, to improve safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity, for you. We continually measure our results and compare them to those of others. Our results over time are displayed below….

  16. Conclusions • “Quality improvement” is primarily a component of proper management, not the creation of new knowledge from research. • Unlike researchers, clinicians and health care organizations have an obligation to improve patient care quality. • Ethical management requires continual improvement, ethically managed, but that is not a human subjects research issue.

  17. What Could OHRP Do? • Clarify that QI work was not meant to come under IRB jurisdiction under the Common Rule. • Encourage health care leaders and clinicians to set standards and articulate guidelines for the ethical conduct of QI, but as a matter separate from “human subjects research.” • Clarify that neither measurement nor learning nor comparison groups nor publication make a QI project “human subjects research.”

More Related