1 / 23

Timothy Schneider NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder, CO

NOAA Research Supporting Hydrometeorological Science & Services: The NOAA Hydrometeorology Testbed (HMT). Timothy Schneider NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder, CO. Contact: Timothy.Schneider@noaa.gov. Outline. An Introduction to HMT An HMT Requirement Observations Modeling

colin
Télécharger la présentation

Timothy Schneider NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder, CO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NOAA Research Supporting Hydrometeorological Science & Services: The NOAA Hydrometeorology Testbed (HMT) Timothy Schneider NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder, CO Contact: Timothy.Schneider@noaa.gov http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  2. Outline • An Introduction to HMT • An HMT Requirement • Observations • Modeling • Research to Operations Projects • An Underlying Principle: Atmospheric Rivers • A Broader Context: Integrated Water Resource Services http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  3. I. An Introduction to HMT http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  4. Marty Ralph NOAA/HMT Building Partnerships • A critical element: engaging local, state and federal stakeholders… • Will evolve as HMT evolves: • Smaller panel with national scope • Form Regional Implementation Teams http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  5. HMT: A National Testbed Strategy with Regional Implementation HMT WEST - Cool Season Major Activity Areas • Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) • Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts (QPF) • Snow level and snow pack • Hydrologic Applications & Surface Processes • Verification & Decision Support Tools • Enhancing & Accelerating Research to Operations • Building partnerships HMT Southeast – All Season, Including Hurricane Landfall HMT “Next” (TBD) • Dabberdt et. al., 2005: Multifunctional Mesoscale Observing Networks, BAMS, pp. 961-982 • Ralph et. al., 2005: Improving Short-Term (0–48 h) Cool-Season Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting Recommendations from a USWRP Workshop, BAMS, pp. 1619-1632 http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  6. Hydrometeorology Testbed Timeline Regions of Focus Key U.S. Watershed Tar-Neuse River Basins West Coast/Russian River American River Analysis HMT-Southeast HMT-West HMT-Next Proof of concept Level of effort / activity CalWater Caljet Pacjet ^ HMT Prototype Field Work EFREP HMT-SE Legacy HMT-West Legacy Fiscal Year NOAA Hydrology Program (Water Resources Data Assimilation) NOAA Science and Technology Infusion Program (Hydrometeorology Testbed) http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  7. II. An HMT Requirement http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  8. Water Management Section, Sacramento District, US Army Corps of Engineers A Water Resource Driver(One Example) • Societal Need: Reservoir operators and water managers need to balance demands for flood control and water supply • They can achieve this through forecast-based operational techniques are being developed by reservoir operators • Stu Townsley: • “NOAA products are essential to Corps flood risk reduction mission” • “The Corps supports forecast product enhancement” http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  9. http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  10. HMT Requirement:Produce accurate 0-120 hour+ forecasts of extreme precipitation (NWS) to enable forecast-based water resource management • Subseasonal Forecasting (Weickman & Berry): • global synoptic dynamic model (GSDM) QPF: 5-14 days Observations Assimilatoin & Downscaling (e.g. PRISM) • Reforecasting (Hamill & Whitaker): • probabilistic • downscaling • analogues for various fields QPF: 3-5 days QPF: 0-3 days • Deterministic Forecasts (McGinley et. al.): • high resolution • ensembles NowCast: QPE->24 hrs.(?) http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  11. III. Research to Operations Projects http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  12. A New Paradigm for Understanding West Coast Storms: Atmospheric Rivers http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  13. Research to Operations Projects • High-resolution ensemble QPF/PQPF • Ensemble means • Probabilistic fields • Moisture Flux Tools • GPSMet Grids • Moisture Flux Verification Tool • Snow Information Tools • Gridded snow level from Q2/NMQ • Point verification; model bias correction • Atmospheric River (AR) ToolsPacific Atmospheric River Threat Indicator, “PARTI” • Water Vapor Flux Anomaly • Observational-based AR intensity • Reforecasting products (NWP) • *HMT Mini-Workshop on FFMP; Boulder, CO, November 2008 http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  14. Research to Operations Projects • FFMP Alpha Tests • Water vapor flux tools: Guidance • QPE bias correction • QPF Grids • EFREP: An HMT Legacy • Network of Snow-level Radars • Enhanced GPSMet Network • Enhanced Soil Moisture Network • Dedicated High-resolution ensemble modeling system • Decision Support Tools and Advanced Display System (ALPS) • *HMT Mini-Workshop on FFMP; Boulder, CO, November 2008 http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  15. IV. A Broader Context: Integrated Water Resource Services http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  16. NOAA Integrated Water Resource Services • Priority Area Task Team: FY 2009 Activities • Too Little Water: National Integrated Drought Information System • Too Much Water: Hydrometeorology Testbed • West • Carry out winter season field operations for the Carson and American River basins • Deploy advanced observational technology to support NOAA/USGS Debris Flow Warning pilots for San Diego, Los Angeles, and Monterey Bay areas • Soil moisture demonstration for monsoon season flash flood support in San Pedro Basin in Southern AZ • Southeast • Conduct two workshops to identify operational needs and research priorities • Develop project implementation plan for Tar/Neuse watersheds • Water Quality (Delaware River Basin/Estuary & Great Lakes • Coast Estuary River Information System (CERIS) & Coastal and Inland Flooding Observation and Warning (CI-FLOW) http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  17. Towards An Integrated Approach • NOAA Integrated Water Resource Services • Hydrometeorology Testbed (HMT) Southeast • Deploy and install advanced observing systems • Conduct intensive observational periods • Initiate research projects • Transition tools/findings into NWS operations • Coastal-Estuary-River Information System (CERIS) Implementation (Tar/Neuse/Pamlico) • CI-FLOW Demonstration (Sea Grant Sponsored R&D Effort) • Provide routine access to HMT Southeast data • Migrate coupled water forecasting system to NOAA operations • Develop, deliver, evaluate and enhance new products and services • THORPEX • Medium Range QPF research supporting HMT • Ensemble numerical modeling for QPF • Strengthens University partner engagement http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  18. Thank You! Backup Slides Contact: Timothy.Schneider@noaa.gov http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  19. Performance measures for “service” programs (e.g., LFW) Performance measures for ST&I (an enabling program) Linking Science, Technology & Infusion Performance Measures to NOAA GPRA Measures Today’s predictive services exist on a foundation of earlier innovation in science and technology Service GPRA (e.g., QPF) Demonstration GPRAs in Testbeds “Infusion” Performance Measures “Science” Performance Measures “Technology” Performance Measures http://hmt.noaa.gov/

  20. snow rain On Developing a Performance Measure for Snow Level Forecasts • HMT introduced a real-time, wind profiler-derived, snow-level product that is updated hourly on the internet. • This new capability prompted NWS staff at the CNRFC to ask ESRL to quantify operational snow level forecast performance. • Lundquist et al. (2008) in J. Hydrometeor. documented the relationship to snow at ground level • 15% of the freezing level forecast errors were greater than +/- 1,000 ft. • When predicted snow level is below what is observed, this translates to underestimates in stream flow, e.g., a 2,000 ft snow-level error can cause a factor of 3 runoff error (White et al., J. Tech. 2002) Results courtesy of Dr. Allen White and Dan Gottas (ESRL/PSD)

  21. NWS California-Nevada River Forecast Center On Developing a Performance Measure for Forecasting Extreme Precipitation • HMT has worked with forecast users to identify critical needs for extreme event prediction. • The existing performance measure for QPF (1 inch “threat score”) does not address this need. • 17 sites were used to assess QPF performance for events exceeding 1 inch, 3 inches, and 5 inches in 24 hours, at 1, 2 and 3-day lead times. • Prototype QPF performance measures for • extreme precipitation events are being developed • and baselines are being created by HMT • Probability of Detecting (Forecasting) a >5 inch event • Bias of QPF in events with >5 inches rain observed • Of 16 events with >5 inches in 24 hours, the QPF bias was low • 0.71 (1-day lead) • 0.60 (2-day lead) • 0.51 (3-day lead) • Of 16 events with >5 inches of rain in 24 h, 2 were predicted 1 day ahead - 5 inch POD = 0.06

  22. Marty Ralph NOAA/HMT The HMT ConceptTestbed as a Process • HMT is about “too much water”… • But is intertwined with broader water resource management, climate & drought issues • Objectives: • To advance our understanding, monitoring and prediction of processes leading to extreme precipitation and associated flooding • To demonstrate and evaluate new research and technology through a national strategy employing regional testbeds • To accelerate and enhance research to operations http://hmt.noaa.gov/

More Related