1 / 23

Surveillance and Broadcast Services

Surveillance and Broadcast Services. Surveillance and Broadcast Services Briefing. By: Rick Castaldo Date: January 9, 2007. Agenda. Background Initial Investment Decision Governance Objective Definition of Program Business Case Review Dual Track Approach Acquisition Status

colista
Télécharger la présentation

Surveillance and Broadcast Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Surveillance and Broadcast Services Surveillance and Broadcast Services Briefing By: Rick Castaldo Date: January 9, 2007

  2. Agenda • Background • Initial Investment Decision • Governance • Objective • Definition of Program • Business Case Review • Dual Track Approach • Acquisition Status • Minimum Avionics Performance • Summary • Next Steps

  3. Background: Initial Investment Decision • On September 9, 2005 the JRC approved the initial investment decision for Future Surveillance and directed the team to seek a final investment decision from the JRC by July 2006. The JRC also approved establishing an ATO-level Surveillance and Broadcast Services office that would be responsible for coordinating and obtaining funding to support the agency-wide resources required to develop, implement, and manage the ADS-B future surveillance services and systems.

  4. Background: Program Governance

  5. Background: Program Objective • Develop a multi-segment, life cycle managed, performance based ADS-B strategy that aligns with the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NGATS) vision and generates value for the National Airspace System (NAS) • Integrate Concept of Operations for Portfolio of ADS-B Applications • Develop Application Life Cycle Management Approach • Portfolio Management for Applications • Requirements Management Across the Applications • Performance Criteria Management • Establish Infrastructure • Continuously Monitor Value and Adjust Investments

  6. Definition of Program: Automatic Dependant Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) • Automatic • Periodically transmits information with no pilot or operator input required • Dependent • Position and velocity vector are derived from the Global Positioning System (GPS) or a Flight Management System (FMS) • Surveillance - • A method of determining position of aircraft, vehicles, or other asset • Broadcast • Transmitted information available to anyone with the appropriate receiving equipment

  7. TIS-B is a service which provides ADS-B equipped aircraft with position reports from secondary surveillance radar on non-ADS-B equipped aircraft. FIS-B transmits graphical National Weather Service products, temporary flight restrictions (TFRs), and special use airspace. Definition of Program: Traffic Information Service - Broadcast / Flight Information Service - Broadcast

  8. Background: Initial ADS-B Services and Applications (1) Merging and Spacing and Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) Assisted Visual Separation (CAVS) are a part of the Enhanced Visual Approaches Application

  9. Dual Track Strategy (Segment 1) Ground Infrastructure 2/2006 – 11/2006 11/2006 – 7/2007 1/2008 – 1/2009 4/2008 – 3/2010 10/2009 – 4/2010 9/2010 Test Ground Infrastructure / Voluntary Avionics Equipage Deploy Ground Infrastructure Initial Operating Capability Acquisition Planning In-Service Decision Acquisition Execution Pre-NPRM Separation Standards Modeling Separation Standards Approval 9/2009 1/2007 – 8/2007 Avionics Equipage Avionics Equipage Begins RPR Phase I RPR Phase 3 RPR Phase 2 Final Rule NPRM 11/2009 12/2009 10/2007 – 4/2008 4/2006 – 9/2006 9/2007 = In Process

  10. Background: Final Investment Decision - Segment 1 • The following recommendations were approved at the June 7, 2006 JRC: • Baseline FY07 and FY08 Costs only • Return for Final Investment Decision for Balance of Program prior to Contract Award (July 2007 Timeframe) • ATO Chief Operating Officer (COO) and Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety (AVS) Designation for Co-ISD Authority • Approve Investment Decision with Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) Action Item Tracked and Closed through the JRC / EC Secretariat

  11. Background: Business Case Review – Segment 1 Economic Analysis

  12. Background: Business Case Review – Requested Baseline Costs Requested Baseline Costs (Segment 1)

  13. Background: Segment 1 Schedule

  14. Interrelationship of Key Milestones Segment 2 JRC RFO Contract Award Backup Analysis NPRM Final Rule In-Service Decision Separation Standards Pre-NPRM Activity: Lower Risk from High to Medium Separation Standards Post-NPRM Activity: Lower Risk from Medium to Retired Key Site IOC

  15. Acquisition: FAA Life Cycle Management Process CONOPS, ISP, and FPR Approved, May 2006 Final Investment Decision (Segment 1), June 2006 Initial Investment Decision, September 2005 RFI, September 2006 SIR, November 2006 Enhanced Surveillance Capability Mission Needs Statement #326, May 2001 Final Investment Decision (Segment 2), February 2007 RFO, March 2007 Final Investment Decision (Remainder Segment 1 & 2), July 2007 Contract Award, July 2007 In Service Decision, September 2010 CONOPS = Concept of Operations; ISP = Integrated Safety Plan; FPR = Final Program Requirements; RFI = Request for Information; SIR = Screening Information Request; RFO = Request for Offer

  16. Acquisition Status: SIR • The Screening Information Request (SIR) was released on November 30, 2006 • The purpose of this SIR is to identify offerors who are most likely to receive an ADS-B contract award • Discussions will continue with those identified offerors ultimately leading to issuance of a Request for Offer (RFO)

  17. Acquisition Status: SIR • Responses are to be submitted no later than January 24, 2007 • A down-select decision is anticipated on or about February 22, 2007 • The RFO will focus on evaluating implementation of Broadcast Services into the NAS and how the services are proposed to be rolled out

  18. ADS-B Tiger Team for Avionics • Purpose • Provide an agreed upon set of assumptions and constraints on positioning performance requirements needed for the NPRM and potential avionics solutions that are critical to determining cost and equipage needs for ADS-B

  19. ADS-B Tiger Team for Avionics • Membership • Jerry Bryant: RTCA • Ken Speir: Delta/ATA • George Ligler: PMEI • Timothy Tuttle: Boeing • Dave Nakamura: Boeing • Jerry Davis: Foxfire • Rick Heinrich: Rockwell Collins • Robert Pomrink: SBS Program Systems Engineering • Pat Zelechoski: FAA/AVS • Bruce DeCleene: FAA/AIR • Paul Railsback: ATA

  20. ADS-B Tiger Team for Avionics • Status • Avionics Performance Requirements • Reviewed performance requirements to support Segment 1 and 2 ADS-B applications • Confirmed that the performance requirements are reasonable to meet the applications and potentially support future applications • Identified 3 potential Avionics Solutions for Air Transport • Multi-Mode Receiver with GPS and Galileo L5 • Satellite Based Augmentation System – WAAS or equivalent • Integrated GPS with Intertial Reference Unit (IRU): Tightly Coupled • Concerns • Fleet wide upgrade required for any of the current options • Business case for the airlines needs to be based on better than 3 and 5NM separation – (considering reduced separations and other applications to support business case)

  21. ADS-B Tiger Team for Avionics • Plans • Complete Issue Paper with recommendations by January 22, 2007

  22. Summary • Program has transitioned from Research and Development (R & D) to Implementation • Segment 1 baseline established • Dual track service acquisition and rulemaking activities underway • Risk Mitigation plans in effect • Governance Process • Backup Analysis underway • Separation Standards Workgroup established • Specification coordination with industry and international community Success through a collaborative FAA / industry relationship

  23. Next Steps • Continue Working Closely with User Community • Business Case • Separation Standards • Equipage Strategy • Critical Milestones • Finalize Acquisition Planning

More Related