1 / 14

Detection of anthropogenic climate change

Detection of anthropogenic climate change. Gabi Hegerl, Nicholas School for the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University. Temperature trend 1901-2000. Fingerprint methods: lin. regression. Estimate amplitude of model-derived climate change signals X=(x i ) ,i=1..n

colton
Télécharger la présentation

Detection of anthropogenic climate change

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Detection of anthropogenic climate change Gabi Hegerl, Nicholas School for the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University

  2. Temperature trend 1901-2000

  3. Fingerprint methods: lin. regression Estimate amplitude of model-derived climate change signals X=(xi),i=1..n from observation y Best Linear Unbiased Estimator u: noise residual (Hasselmann, 79 etc, Allen + Tett, 99) Vector: eg Temperature(space,time), scalar product: Inverse noise covariance Signal pattern from model, amplitude from observation!

  4. June-July-August Greenhouse gas + sulfate aerosol

  5. uncertainty range • Estimated from coupled model internal variability • Safety checks: • Use model with strong variability • test consistency with observed noise residual u

  6. Contribution of greenhouse gas and sulfate aerosols to to trend 1949-98 o: Greenhouse gas + sulfate aerosol simulation +: Greenhouse gas only o/+inconsistent with observation Ellipse: 90% uncertainty range in obs. Signal estimate from: Hegerl and Allen, 2002

  7. The longer perspective reconstruction of NH warm season temperature Forced component Fat: best fit to paleo Thin: 5-95% range *: significant

  8. Conclusions global/NH SAT • Significant climate change observed • Uncertainty in distinction between forcings, but: • “Most of the recent (last 50 yrs) global warming is likely due to greenhouse gases” • Significant and consistent climate signals in long temperature records

  9. Towards detection of anthropogenic changes in climate extremes • How to compare course-grid model with station data? • Can daily data be substituted by monthly/annual and shift in distribution => no • Which index to use for early detection (avoid baseball statistics!) that is moderately robust between models? Change in once/few times/yr events robust and strong

  10. Changes in precipitation extremes stronger

  11. Change in rainfall wettest day/yr NAmerica Consensus Observations show overall increase, too

  12. Annual mean precip changes consistent between two models Wettest day/yr Wettest 5 consecutive days

  13. Results: Anthropogenic vs natural signals, time-space Bars show 5-95% uncertainty limits Allen et al, 2002

  14. Annual mean rainfall change NAmerica consensus

More Related