1 / 12

2009 TSO Transparency

2009 TSO Transparency. Gas Regional Initiative North-West OG Meeting, 29. Spetember 2009 The Hague. Background. 3 rd Package. TSO Project 2009. 2009. Binding requirements – known elements. Focus on deliverables and implementation 3 rd package. Commission proposal for 1775 Annex.

conan-sparks
Télécharger la présentation

2009 TSO Transparency

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2009 TSO Transparency Gas Regional Initiative North-West OG Meeting, 29. Spetember 2009 The Hague

  2. Background 3rd Package TSO Project 2009 2009 Binding requirements – known elements Focus on deliverables and implementation 3rd package Commission proposal for 1775 Annex MinTra-elements through comitology EFET MinTra Shippers‘ common EU requirements TSO Project 2008 Implementing EFET wish list focusing on capacity and flows EFET wish list To express shippers‘ needs Dublin announcement To meet the shippers‘ needs for a transparent market. 2006 OG-Meeting 2009 TSO Transparency 29. September 2009 Oliver Altenhoff

  3. Common Understanding EU-wide • Regulation (EC) 715/2009 applicable as of 3 March 2011 • To ensure consistent definition of the transparency obligations by TSOs, GTE+ has undertaken to define a common European approach by specifying the deliverable • Additional transparency obligations TSOs – GRI project to ensure consisten implementation OG-Meeting 2009 TSO Transparency 29. September 2009 Oliver Altenhoff

  4. Transparency Obligations OG-Meeting 2009 TSO Transparency 29. September 2009 Oliver Altenhoff • “The transmission system operator shall make public ex-ante and ex-post supply and demand information, based on nominations, forecasts and realised flows in and out of the system. The national regulatory authority shall ensure that all such information is made public. The level of detail of the information that is made public shall reflect the information available to the transmission system operator. • The transmission system operator shall make public measures taken as well as costs incurred and revenue generated to balance the system. • The market participants concerned shall provide the transmission system operator with the data referred to in this Article.” • “Each LNG and storage system operator shall make public the amount of gas in each storage or LNG facility, or group of storage facilities if that corresponds to the way in which the access is offered to system users, inflows and outflows, and the available storage and LNG facility capacities, including for those facilities exempted from third-party access. That information shall also be communicated to the transmission system operator, which shall make it public on an aggregated level per system or subsystem defined by the relevant points. The information shall be updated at least daily.” *

  5. European work in progress position explained later • GRI NW Operators • Need to hear stakeholders and regulators reaction • May want to go wider and faster • Will await outcome of EU workshop tomorrow • RCC view on information release • Principles for information release: • Information should be provided • No harm to stakeholders • No harm to TSOs • Costs of service rewarded OG-Meeting 2009 TSO Transparency 29. September 2009 Oliver Altenhoff

  6. Ex-ante Supply and Demand OG-Meeting 2009 TSO Transparency 29. September 2009 Oliver Altenhoff • D-1 nominations per system • Aggregated for all entries (cross-border points, local production, LNG facilities, storage) • Aggregated for the following exits: cross-border points, storage, LNG facilities where applicable • Based on the input from the network users/suppliers: national demand

  7. Ex-post Supply and Demand OG-Meeting 2009 TSO Transparency 29. September 2009 Oliver Altenhoff • D+1 allocations per system • Aggregated for all entries (cross-border points, local production, LNG facilities, storage) • Aggregated for all exits (cross-border points, storage, LNG facilities where applicable, national demand)

  8. Balancing Info OG-Meeting 2009 TSO Transparency 29. September 2009 Oliver Altenhoff • Measures to balance the system • model (balancing period) • tolerances (types + range) • info to users prior to and during the respective Gas-Day • cash-out mechanism • balancing mechanisms used by the TSO • Incurred costs • Generated revenues

  9. Storage & LNG Info OG-Meeting 2009 TSO Transparency 29. September 2009 Oliver Altenhoff • Daily aggregated amount of gas in storage facilities per (sub)system • Daily aggregated amount of gas in LNG facilities per (sub)system • Daily aggregated inflows and aggregated outflows in and from storage facilities per (sub)system • Daily aggregated inflows and aggregated outflows in and from LNG facilities per (sub)system • Daily available capacities at storage facilities aggregated per (sub)system • Daily available capacities at LNG facilities aggregated per (sub)system • Outstanding questions • If a TSO only publishes the information on the GTE+ Transparency Platform only, will the TSO comply with the obligation? • What should be the process for transferring the data?

  10. Conclusions OG-Meeting 2009 TSO Transparency 29. September 2009 Oliver Altenhoff • 3rd energy package has brought some more explicit transparency provisions but considerable room for interpretation still remains • Transparency provisions primarily define what information should be published NOT always who the originator of the information is (e.g. forecasts), which is subject to a subsidiarity principle and needs to be decided at the national level • GTE+ has attempted to define a common European approach to implementation to ensure consistency and comparability of information

  11. Project plan for new project • Design Phase 2009 June 09 Dec. 09 • Definitions on deliverables and responsibilities • Agreement on EU level • TSOs in the region ensure the communication to an EU-wide level • Implementation Phase 2010 Jan. 10 Dec. 10 • In line with implementation requirements of 3rd package • TSO individual implementation plans • Implementation report on stakeholder group meetings in 2010 OG-Meeting 2009 TSO Transparency 29. September 2009 Oliver Altenhoff

  12. Implementation Plan to be discussed • Implementation Phase 2010 Schedule A Schedule B Schedule C Participant 1 Participant 2 December 2010 . September 2010 … … Participant 3 December 2010 … … Participant 4 April 2010 … June 2010 … To be agreed with NRA! OG-Meeting 2009 TSO Transparency 29. September 2009 Oliver Altenhoff

More Related