1 / 13

Methods of Proof (§1.7)

Methods of Proof (§1.7). Methods of mathematical argument (proof methods) can be formalized in terms of rules of logical inference . Mathematical proofs can themselves be represented formally as discrete structures.

conner
Télécharger la présentation

Methods of Proof (§1.7)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Methods of Proof (§1.7) • Methods of mathematical argument (proof methods) can be formalized in terms of rules of logical inference. • Mathematical proofs can themselves be represented formally as discrete structures. • We will review both correct & fallacious inference rules, & several proof methods. 推論規則

  2. Proof Terminology • Theorem - A statement that has been proven to be true. • Axioms, postulates, hypotheses, premises - Assumptions (often unproven) defining the structures about which we are reasoning. • Rules of inference - Patterns of logically valid deductions from hypotheses to conclusions.

  3. More Proof Terminology • Lemma - A minor theorem used as a stepping-stone to proving a major theorem. • Corollary - A minor theorem proved as an easy consequence of a major theorem. • Conjecture - A statement whose truth value has not been proven. (A conjecture may be widely believed to be true, regardless.)

  4. Formal Proofs • A formal proof of a conclusion C, given premises p1, p2,…,pnconsists of a sequence of steps, each of which applies some inference to premises or previously-proven statements (as antecedents) to yield a new true statement (the consequent). • A proof demonstrates that if the premises are true, then the conclusion is true.

  5. Formal Proof Example • Premises:“It is not sunny and it is cold.”“We will swim only if it is sunny.”“If we do not swim, then we will canoe.”“If we canoe, then we will be home early.” • Given these premises, prove “We will be home early” using inference rules.

  6. Proof Example cont. • Let sunny=“It is sunny”; cold=“It is cold;” swim=“We will swim;” canoe=“We will canoe;” early=“We will be home early.” • Premises:(1) sunny  cold (2) swimsunny(3) swimcanoe (4) canoeearly 論證假設

  7. Proof Example cont. StepProved by1. sunny  cold Premise #1.2. sunny (pq)p “Simplification”3. swimsunny Premise #2.4. swim[q(pq)]p “Modus tollens”5. swimcanoe Premise #3.6. canoe[p(pq)]q “Modus ponens”7. canoeearly Premise #4.8. early[p(pq)]q “Modus ponens”

  8. Proof Methods For proving implications pq, we have: • Direct proof: Assume p is true, and prove q. Ex: “If n is an odd integer, then n2 is odd.” Pf: Assume that n = 2k + 1 for some integer k. Then …. • Indirect proof: Assume q, and prove p. Ex: “If 3n+2 is odd, then n is an odd integer.” Pf: Suppose that n is an even integer, n = 2k for some integer k. Then …. (直接證明) (間接證明;反證法)

  9. Proof Methods (cont.) • Vacuous proof: “F  q” is always true. Ex: “If 0 > 1, then n > n+1.” • Trivial proof: “pT” is always true. Ex: “If a and b are positive integers, then 0a = 1 = 0b.” • Proof by cases: Show p(a  b) and (aq) and (bq). Ex: “If n is an integer, then n(n+1) is even.” (空泛證明) (平庸證明) (分案證明)

  10. Proof by Contradiction 歸謬證法 • A method for proving p. • Assume p, and prove both q and q for some proposition q. • Thus p (q  q) • (q  q) is a trivial contradiction, equal to F • Thus pF, which is only true if p=F • Thus p is true. Ex: “There are infinite many primes.”

  11. Proving Existentials • A proof of a statement of the form xP(x) is called an existence proof. • If the proof demonstrates how to actually find or construct a specific element a such that P(a) is true, then it is a constructive proof. • Ex: “If gcd(a, m)=1, then the inverse of a modulo m exists.” Pf: s, tZ such that sa+tm=1. Then s is the inverse of a modulo m. • Otherwise, it is nonconstructive. (存在證明) (建構性的) (非建構性的)

  12. Limits on Proofs  Conjecture 臆測;假說 • Some very simple statements of number theory haven’t been proved or disproved! • E.g. Goldbach’s conjecture (1742): Every even integer n, n>2, is the sum of two primes. • n>2  primes p,q : n=(p+q)/2. (As of mid-2002, the conjecture has been checked for all positive even integer up to 4 following 14 zeros.) • “Every even positive integer n, n>2, is the sum of at most six primes.” (Ramaré, 1995)

  13. More Conjectures • The Twin Primes Conjecture: “There are infinitely many twin primes.” - Twin primes: 3 and 5; 5 and 7; 11 and 13 etc. - The would record for twin primes, mid-2002, consists of the numbers 318,032,361(2107,001)1. • One of the most famous conjectures: (Fermat’s last Theorem) The equation xn+ yn = znhas no nonzero integer solution whenever integer n 2. • This theorem was proved by Wiles in 90s.

More Related