International Linear Collider Program Management

1. International Linear Collider Program Management Committee of Visitors June 18, 2007 Paul Grannis ILC Program Manager DOE Office of High Energy Physics

2. ILC Global Organization FALC = Funding Agencies LC (R. Petronzio) ILCSC = International LC Steering Committee (S. Kurokawa) LCSGA = LC Steering Gp Americas (M. Tigner) GDE = Global Design Effort(B. Barish) WWS = Worldwide Study (Brau, Richard, Yamamoto) ART =Americas Regional Team (G. Dugan → M. Harrison) LCSG Europe ALCPG =Americas LC Physics Gp (J. Brau,M. Oreglia) LCSG Asia key Asia RT (M. Nozaki) oversight Europe phys/det regional interest Europe RT (B. Foster) accelerator Asia phys/det detector/ physics

3. DOE ILC Interactions ILCSC (S. Kurokawa) FALC (R. Petronzio) Discuss strategy DOE Accelerator R&D/design budget advice Advise on US specific issues review review advice Detector planningR&D budget advice WWS = Worldwide Study (Brau, Richard, Yamamoto) GDE = Global Design Effort(B. Barish) LCSGA(M. Tigner) ART (G. Dugan → M. Harrison) ALCPG (J. Brau, M. Oreglia) LCSG Europe Europe phys/det Asia RT (M. Nozaki) LCSG Asia Asia phys/det Europe RT (B. Foster)

4. HEP ILC Objectives • Accelerator: • Oversee and support US ILC R&D and design activities by ART in collaboration with international GDE * • Develop budget requests and priorities for US ILC R&D • Evaluate and award university ILC accelerator R&D grants * • Guide planning for a potential US site with LCSGA • Develop materials concerning ILC for Office of Science, OSTP etc. • Detector: • Support and oversee US ILC detector R&D by ALCPG* • Evaluate and award university/lab detector R&D grants * • International: • Participate in FALC on international ILC program discussion * * Joint with NSF; DOE lead

5. R&D Program through FY2006 Prior to FY2006, ILC R&D handled within Advanced Accelerator Development program. Through FY2004, ILC (NLC) budgets were capped at $19.6M; in FY2005 was $23.75M Late FY2005: GDE and ART formed & directors named. OHEP ILC Program Manager appointed. FY2006 budget $29.7M. Recommendation from ART director based on proposals andconsultations with Laboratories; iteration with labs and OHEP. Due to recent organization of ART/GDE and DOE, substantial reserve kept to address needs later in the year. FY2006

6. FY2007 Budget process FY2007 ART plan was based on proposals from Labs (total requested was over twice President’s budget of $54M for non-detector R&D). Extensive consultation by ART director with Laboratories and GDE R&D Board, and interaction with OHEP, led to recommendation at $60M, then at $45M (Senate mark). Special panel of LCSGA advised on ‘Regional Interest’ budgets, and on accelerator/detector splits. FY2007 Continuing resolution until Mar. 2007. Final ILC R&D appropriation was $42M. Detector R&D handled separately. Growing expenditures at FNAL for SC rf infrastructure (~$20M in FY2007) off the ILC budget First DOE/NSF review held in April 2006. Consultants called for integrated multi-year R&D plan, and asked for more structured oversight and planning.

7. Planning for FY2008 • For FY2008 and FY2009 ART management & planning was restructured; Appoint WBS level 2 managers for each major machine subsystem to direct that work package R&D. • Proposals from WBS managers to ART director for R&D plan and budgets. OHEP participation in planning meetings, evolution of recommendation. • Significant input from Labs, and GDE R&D Board on global R&D priorities. • FY2008 President’s budget opened new SCRF line ($23.455M) in addition to ILC R&D ($60M). Inclusion of program overheads at SLAC and FNAL required retune. • ART modified recommendation on basis of President’s budget; ongoing discussion with OHEP to address programmatic concerns. • May 2007 ART review panel endorsed the new management structure.

8. University grants A program of ILC grants to universities for accelerator R&D was initiated in 2002, aiming to stimulate engagement in ILC. A parallel program for detector R&D was also started. Joint oversight/review by DOE & NSF. Detector Accelerator FY2007 is the last year of grants for accelerator R&D. In future, ILC specific work will be included in the ILC line budget, as recommended by ART. More generic R&D that has application also to ILC will be included as part of the AARD program. The detector R&D program is operated through an umbrella grant to University of Oregon. First review June 19, 20. The detector grant program will continue, and is expected to grow.

9. Backup information

10. Accelerator grants in FY2006 (Many grants have Lab partners) Ohio State Rad hard 500 MHz digitizer UC Berkeley, Notre Dame RF beam pos’n monitors Cornell, SUNY Albany Synch. radiation imaging BPM UC Davis Radiation damage studies MIT Beam loss mitigation in klystrons Illinois, Cornell Injection/ejection kicker magnets Cornell, Illinois Fast kicker prototypes Colorado State Linac element girder movers New Mexico, NM State Effects of coherent synch. rad’n Cornell Simulation of linac, BDS optics Cornell, Minnesota Expt, simulation, design for damp rings

11. Accelerator grants in FY2006 Wisconsin Photocathodes for pol. electron source Wisconsin High purity Nb for cavities Northwestern Atom probe microscopy in Nb Old Dominion Plasma etching for Nb cavities Michigan St, Texas A&M Chemical polishing Nb studies William and Mary, Va Tech Electropolishing studies Cornell Undulator prototyping for e+ polarization Northern Illinois Longitudinal phase space monitor Cornell Design for CESR damping ring tests Pennsylvania Real time simulator for low level rf 21 current grants Average grant ≈ $50K

12. University-lab partnerships The laboratories team with university partners on a variety of high priority R&D projects for ILC (sometimes augmented by DOE/NSF grants, sometimes on University or Lab MOU funds): Fermilab Michigan St High pressure rinse facility, materials, cavity vendor development, TIG welding UICC damping ring fast kickers Cornell BCP and EP cavity processing, materials Pennsylvania Low level rf Northern Ill cooperative grad student research Wisconsin SCrf materials Northwestern SCrf materials Argonne UIUC Damping ring studies Northern Ill phase space manipulation in e- DR

13. University-lab partnerships SLAC So. California electron cloud simulations Texas A&M secondary emission yields, e-cloud UC Berkeley cavity BPM energy spectrometer Notre Dame cavity BPM energy spectrometer Oregon synchrotron stripe energy spectrometer (+ various universities in UK, Germany, Japan) JLab Wm & Mary Nb surface treatment, EP processing Boston Univ. Nb surface treatment Old Dominion plasma treatment of Nb surfaces NC State crystalline characterization of Nb Univ. Virginia surface impedance measurements of Nb

14. Detector grants in FY2006 Iowa State Cerenkov luminosity monitor Oregon Extraction line energy monitor Notre Dame BPM based energy monitor Iowa Polarimetry studies Tufts Compton polarimeter backgrounds Wayne State Incoherent and coherent beamstrahlung Yale Pixel vertex detector R&D UC Berkeley Monolithic pixel detector prototype U. Washington Vertex detector mechanical structures Hawaii CMOS pixel detector Lousiana Tech GEM-based tracking Cornell Micro pattern gas detector for TPC

15. Detector grants in FY2006 Michigan Tracker alignment and simulations UC Santa Cruz Long shaping time Si microstrip readout Colorado SiD barrel reconstruction studies Kansas State Calorimeter-based tracking for PFA Purdue Thin silicon sensors for tracking Cornell TPC signal digitization simulation Northern Illinois Scintillator based hadron calorimetry Colorado Scintillator forward calorimetry Iowa PFA studies Oregon SiW EM calorimeter test module U. Texas Arlington GEM based hadron calorimetry Northern Illinois PFA algorithms and simulations

16. Detector grants in FY2006 Kansas EM calorimeter concepts for PFA Argonne Prototype RPC hadron calorimeter Iowa State 4th concept design Princeton Calorimeter and muon ID U. Washington Scintillator/Cerenkov calorimetry Yale Electronics standards Wayne State Solid state photomultiplier development Wayne State Scintillator based muon detector Colorado State Geiger mode avalanche photodiodes 33 grants Average grant ≈ $35K

17. NSF/DOE position on University R&D activity “Both DOE and NSF recognize the high priority placed by HEPAP and the recent NRC EPP2010 report on conducting a vigorous R&D program that could lead to the ILC project.  Both agencies currently fund university grants for both detector and accelerator research with applicability to the ILC.  These programs have been modest but have grown over the past several years. “Both agencies respond to grants through the peer review process. They welcome proposals for which ILC detector or accelerator R&D is the whole or a component of the effort, as well as for generic research that may have some bearing on ILC issues. In addition, there is often some latitude within existing grant funds to consider new directions. The use of existing grant funds for ILC-related research depends upon the details of each proposal and grant holders are encouraged to speak with their program monitors on the appropriate extent of such activities.”